Subordination as a potential marker of complexity in serious and popular fiction

A corpus stylistic approach to the testing of literary critical claims

Rocio Montoro, Dan McIntyre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this paper, we use a corpus stylistic methodology to investigate whether serious (i.e., ‘literary’) fiction is syntactically more complex than popular (i.e., ‘genre’) fiction. This is on the basis of literary critical claims that the structural complexity of serious fiction is one of the features that distinguishes it from popular literature (which, by contrast, is seen as easier to read). We compare the serious and popular fiction sections of the Lancaster Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation corpus (see Semino and Short, 2004) against various samples of the British National Corpus available in Wmatrix (Rayson, 2009), focussing particularly (though not exclusively) on the identification of subordinating conjunctions. We find that, on this measure, there is no basis for claiming that serious fiction is any more complex syntactically than popular fiction. We then investigate the issue in relation to a specific genre of popular fiction, Chick Lit. Here we find that while syntactic simplicity exists, this is at a phrasal rather than a clausal level. We argue that by using a corpus stylistic approach we are able to qualify accurately certain literary critical claims about syntactic complexity as a distinguishing feature of serious and popular fiction, and to propose a refined hypothesis which might be used in further studies of the syntactic structures used in these two text types.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-299
Number of pages25
JournalCorpora
Volume14
Issue number3
Early online date1 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

popular fiction
genre
Corpus Stylistics
Subordination
Popular Fiction
Testing
methodology
Syntax

Cite this

@article{f239bd4596084358a3a600c602847a98,
title = "Subordination as a potential marker of complexity in serious and popular fiction: A corpus stylistic approach to the testing of literary critical claims",
abstract = "In this paper, we use a corpus stylistic methodology to investigate whether serious (i.e., ‘literary’) fiction is syntactically more complex than popular (i.e., ‘genre’) fiction. This is on the basis of literary critical claims that the structural complexity of serious fiction is one of the features that distinguishes it from popular literature (which, by contrast, is seen as easier to read). We compare the serious and popular fiction sections of the Lancaster Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation corpus (see Semino and Short, 2004) against various samples of the British National Corpus available in Wmatrix (Rayson, 2009), focussing particularly (though not exclusively) on the identification of subordinating conjunctions. We find that, on this measure, there is no basis for claiming that serious fiction is any more complex syntactically than popular fiction. We then investigate the issue in relation to a specific genre of popular fiction, Chick Lit. Here we find that while syntactic simplicity exists, this is at a phrasal rather than a clausal level. We argue that by using a corpus stylistic approach we are able to qualify accurately certain literary critical claims about syntactic complexity as a distinguishing feature of serious and popular fiction, and to propose a refined hypothesis which might be used in further studies of the syntactic structures used in these two text types.",
keywords = "corpus stylistics, Chick Lit, serious and popular fiction, subordinating conjunctions",
author = "Rocio Montoro and Dan McIntyre",
note = "This article has been accepted for publication by Edinburgh University Press in the journal Corpora.",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3366/cor.2019.0175",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "275--299",
journal = "Corpora",
issn = "1749-5032",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subordination as a potential marker of complexity in serious and popular fiction

T2 - A corpus stylistic approach to the testing of literary critical claims

AU - Montoro, Rocio

AU - McIntyre, Dan

N1 - This article has been accepted for publication by Edinburgh University Press in the journal Corpora.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - In this paper, we use a corpus stylistic methodology to investigate whether serious (i.e., ‘literary’) fiction is syntactically more complex than popular (i.e., ‘genre’) fiction. This is on the basis of literary critical claims that the structural complexity of serious fiction is one of the features that distinguishes it from popular literature (which, by contrast, is seen as easier to read). We compare the serious and popular fiction sections of the Lancaster Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation corpus (see Semino and Short, 2004) against various samples of the British National Corpus available in Wmatrix (Rayson, 2009), focussing particularly (though not exclusively) on the identification of subordinating conjunctions. We find that, on this measure, there is no basis for claiming that serious fiction is any more complex syntactically than popular fiction. We then investigate the issue in relation to a specific genre of popular fiction, Chick Lit. Here we find that while syntactic simplicity exists, this is at a phrasal rather than a clausal level. We argue that by using a corpus stylistic approach we are able to qualify accurately certain literary critical claims about syntactic complexity as a distinguishing feature of serious and popular fiction, and to propose a refined hypothesis which might be used in further studies of the syntactic structures used in these two text types.

AB - In this paper, we use a corpus stylistic methodology to investigate whether serious (i.e., ‘literary’) fiction is syntactically more complex than popular (i.e., ‘genre’) fiction. This is on the basis of literary critical claims that the structural complexity of serious fiction is one of the features that distinguishes it from popular literature (which, by contrast, is seen as easier to read). We compare the serious and popular fiction sections of the Lancaster Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation corpus (see Semino and Short, 2004) against various samples of the British National Corpus available in Wmatrix (Rayson, 2009), focussing particularly (though not exclusively) on the identification of subordinating conjunctions. We find that, on this measure, there is no basis for claiming that serious fiction is any more complex syntactically than popular fiction. We then investigate the issue in relation to a specific genre of popular fiction, Chick Lit. Here we find that while syntactic simplicity exists, this is at a phrasal rather than a clausal level. We argue that by using a corpus stylistic approach we are able to qualify accurately certain literary critical claims about syntactic complexity as a distinguishing feature of serious and popular fiction, and to propose a refined hypothesis which might be used in further studies of the syntactic structures used in these two text types.

KW - corpus stylistics

KW - Chick Lit

KW - serious and popular fiction

KW - subordinating conjunctions

U2 - 10.3366/cor.2019.0175

DO - 10.3366/cor.2019.0175

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 275

EP - 299

JO - Corpora

JF - Corpora

SN - 1749-5032

IS - 3

ER -