Sustainability vs. Safety

Confusion, Conflict and Contradiction in Designing out Crime

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter highlights the confusing and contradictory policy and guidance within the field of designing out crime within the built environment and challenges policy makers to address an issue which, as yet, has remained unresolved. Whilst it is accepted that conflicting research will always exist, the current debate surrounding the criminogenic features of permeable design has diverted practitioners' attention from the immediate task of reducing crime. Having highlighted the current conflict within the UK planning system, the chapter concludes with a detailed analysis of the specific environmental factors which increase a property's vulnerability to victimisation. This is presented as a simple, usable risk assessment mechanism to be used by crime reduction practitioners as a means of identifying which properties will become vulnerable to crime if built (therefore allowing them to challenge planning applications) or in the case of properties already developed, allowing resources to be directed towards properties at most risk.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationImagination for Crime Prevention
Subtitle of host publicationEssays in Honour of Ken Pease
EditorsGraham Farrell, Kate J. Bowers, Shane D. Johnson, Mike Townsley
PublisherLynne Rienner Publishers
ISBN (Print)9781881798705, 9781881798712
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Publication series

NameCrime Prevention Studies
PublisherLynne Rienner Publishers
Volume21

Fingerprint

sustainability
offense
planning
victimization
risk assessment
environmental factors
vulnerability
resources

Cite this

Armitage, R. (2007). Sustainability vs. Safety: Confusion, Conflict and Contradiction in Designing out Crime. In G. Farrell, K. J. Bowers, S. D. Johnson, & M. Townsley (Eds.), Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease (Crime Prevention Studies; Vol. 21). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Armitage, Rachel. / Sustainability vs. Safety : Confusion, Conflict and Contradiction in Designing out Crime. Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease. editor / Graham Farrell ; Kate J. Bowers ; Shane D. Johnson ; Mike Townsley. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007. (Crime Prevention Studies).
@inbook{b1ef78f197b541ebb6ed89d5044a761f,
title = "Sustainability vs. Safety: Confusion, Conflict and Contradiction in Designing out Crime",
abstract = "This chapter highlights the confusing and contradictory policy and guidance within the field of designing out crime within the built environment and challenges policy makers to address an issue which, as yet, has remained unresolved. Whilst it is accepted that conflicting research will always exist, the current debate surrounding the criminogenic features of permeable design has diverted practitioners' attention from the immediate task of reducing crime. Having highlighted the current conflict within the UK planning system, the chapter concludes with a detailed analysis of the specific environmental factors which increase a property's vulnerability to victimisation. This is presented as a simple, usable risk assessment mechanism to be used by crime reduction practitioners as a means of identifying which properties will become vulnerable to crime if built (therefore allowing them to challenge planning applications) or in the case of properties already developed, allowing resources to be directed towards properties at most risk.",
keywords = "Crime, Design, Risk assessment, Security, Sustainability",
author = "Rachel Armitage",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781881798705",
series = "Crime Prevention Studies",
publisher = "Lynne Rienner Publishers",
editor = "Graham Farrell and Bowers, {Kate J.} and Johnson, {Shane D.} and Mike Townsley",
booktitle = "Imagination for Crime Prevention",
address = "United States",

}

Armitage, R 2007, Sustainability vs. Safety: Confusion, Conflict and Contradiction in Designing out Crime. in G Farrell, KJ Bowers, SD Johnson & M Townsley (eds), Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease. Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 21, Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Sustainability vs. Safety : Confusion, Conflict and Contradiction in Designing out Crime. / Armitage, Rachel.

Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease. ed. / Graham Farrell; Kate J. Bowers; Shane D. Johnson; Mike Townsley. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007. (Crime Prevention Studies; Vol. 21).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sustainability vs. Safety

T2 - Confusion, Conflict and Contradiction in Designing out Crime

AU - Armitage, Rachel

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This chapter highlights the confusing and contradictory policy and guidance within the field of designing out crime within the built environment and challenges policy makers to address an issue which, as yet, has remained unresolved. Whilst it is accepted that conflicting research will always exist, the current debate surrounding the criminogenic features of permeable design has diverted practitioners' attention from the immediate task of reducing crime. Having highlighted the current conflict within the UK planning system, the chapter concludes with a detailed analysis of the specific environmental factors which increase a property's vulnerability to victimisation. This is presented as a simple, usable risk assessment mechanism to be used by crime reduction practitioners as a means of identifying which properties will become vulnerable to crime if built (therefore allowing them to challenge planning applications) or in the case of properties already developed, allowing resources to be directed towards properties at most risk.

AB - This chapter highlights the confusing and contradictory policy and guidance within the field of designing out crime within the built environment and challenges policy makers to address an issue which, as yet, has remained unresolved. Whilst it is accepted that conflicting research will always exist, the current debate surrounding the criminogenic features of permeable design has diverted practitioners' attention from the immediate task of reducing crime. Having highlighted the current conflict within the UK planning system, the chapter concludes with a detailed analysis of the specific environmental factors which increase a property's vulnerability to victimisation. This is presented as a simple, usable risk assessment mechanism to be used by crime reduction practitioners as a means of identifying which properties will become vulnerable to crime if built (therefore allowing them to challenge planning applications) or in the case of properties already developed, allowing resources to be directed towards properties at most risk.

KW - Crime

KW - Design

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Security

KW - Sustainability

UR - https://www.rienner.com/title/Imagination_for_Crime_Prevention_Essays_in_Honour_of_Ken_Pease

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781881798705

SN - 9781881798712

T3 - Crime Prevention Studies

BT - Imagination for Crime Prevention

A2 - Farrell, Graham

A2 - Bowers, Kate J.

A2 - Johnson, Shane D.

A2 - Townsley, Mike

PB - Lynne Rienner Publishers

ER -

Armitage R. Sustainability vs. Safety: Confusion, Conflict and Contradiction in Designing out Crime. In Farrell G, Bowers KJ, Johnson SD, Townsley M, editors, Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease. Lynne Rienner Publishers. 2007. (Crime Prevention Studies).