Team Role Preference and Cognitive Styles: A Convergent Validity Study

Aitor Aritzeta, Barbara Senior, Stephen Swailes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While exploring the relationships between the strength of an individual's team roles and his or her cognitive styles, this study examines the convergent validity of the Team Role Self-Perception Inventory (TRSPI) with Kirton's Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI). Data were obtained from two samples of 109 managers and 114 students. Results from students were compared to those obtained by Fisher, Macrosson, and Wong (1998) to explore differences arising from the use of Cattell, Eber, and Tatsuoka's (1970) 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) and the TRSPI. Data from managers were used to examine convergence between team role preferences and cognitive styles. The TRSPI showed convergent validity with Kirton's cognitive styles. KAI subscale correlations were more coherent than those obtained by Fisher et al. probably due to misinterpretation of innovative and adaptive subscale scores. Cognitive style differences were found in the two samples. Future research and practical implications for team-building interventions and team performance are discussed.

LanguageEnglish
Pages404-436
Number of pages33
JournalSmall Group Research
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Self Concept
Students
Personality

Cite this

Aritzeta, Aitor ; Senior, Barbara ; Swailes, Stephen. / Team Role Preference and Cognitive Styles : A Convergent Validity Study. In: Small Group Research. 2005 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 404-436.
@article{bca4a3037b624239b433e1d7db768ca0,
title = "Team Role Preference and Cognitive Styles: A Convergent Validity Study",
abstract = "While exploring the relationships between the strength of an individual's team roles and his or her cognitive styles, this study examines the convergent validity of the Team Role Self-Perception Inventory (TRSPI) with Kirton's Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI). Data were obtained from two samples of 109 managers and 114 students. Results from students were compared to those obtained by Fisher, Macrosson, and Wong (1998) to explore differences arising from the use of Cattell, Eber, and Tatsuoka's (1970) 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) and the TRSPI. Data from managers were used to examine convergence between team role preferences and cognitive styles. The TRSPI showed convergent validity with Kirton's cognitive styles. KAI subscale correlations were more coherent than those obtained by Fisher et al. probably due to misinterpretation of innovative and adaptive subscale scores. Cognitive style differences were found in the two samples. Future research and practical implications for team-building interventions and team performance are discussed.",
keywords = "Adaption, Cognitive styles, Convergent validity, Innovation, Team performance, Team roles",
author = "Aitor Aritzeta and Barbara Senior and Stephen Swailes",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1046496404273742",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "404--436",
journal = "Small Group Research",
issn = "1046-4964",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Team Role Preference and Cognitive Styles : A Convergent Validity Study. / Aritzeta, Aitor; Senior, Barbara; Swailes, Stephen.

In: Small Group Research, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.08.2005, p. 404-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Team Role Preference and Cognitive Styles

T2 - Small Group Research

AU - Aritzeta, Aitor

AU - Senior, Barbara

AU - Swailes, Stephen

PY - 2005/8/1

Y1 - 2005/8/1

N2 - While exploring the relationships between the strength of an individual's team roles and his or her cognitive styles, this study examines the convergent validity of the Team Role Self-Perception Inventory (TRSPI) with Kirton's Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI). Data were obtained from two samples of 109 managers and 114 students. Results from students were compared to those obtained by Fisher, Macrosson, and Wong (1998) to explore differences arising from the use of Cattell, Eber, and Tatsuoka's (1970) 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) and the TRSPI. Data from managers were used to examine convergence between team role preferences and cognitive styles. The TRSPI showed convergent validity with Kirton's cognitive styles. KAI subscale correlations were more coherent than those obtained by Fisher et al. probably due to misinterpretation of innovative and adaptive subscale scores. Cognitive style differences were found in the two samples. Future research and practical implications for team-building interventions and team performance are discussed.

AB - While exploring the relationships between the strength of an individual's team roles and his or her cognitive styles, this study examines the convergent validity of the Team Role Self-Perception Inventory (TRSPI) with Kirton's Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI). Data were obtained from two samples of 109 managers and 114 students. Results from students were compared to those obtained by Fisher, Macrosson, and Wong (1998) to explore differences arising from the use of Cattell, Eber, and Tatsuoka's (1970) 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) and the TRSPI. Data from managers were used to examine convergence between team role preferences and cognitive styles. The TRSPI showed convergent validity with Kirton's cognitive styles. KAI subscale correlations were more coherent than those obtained by Fisher et al. probably due to misinterpretation of innovative and adaptive subscale scores. Cognitive style differences were found in the two samples. Future research and practical implications for team-building interventions and team performance are discussed.

KW - Adaption

KW - Cognitive styles

KW - Convergent validity

KW - Innovation

KW - Team performance

KW - Team roles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22944472987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1046496404273742

DO - 10.1177/1046496404273742

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 404

EP - 436

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

SN - 1046-4964

IS - 4

ER -