Team role preference and conflict management styles

Aitor Aritzeta, Sabino Ayestaran, Stephen Swailes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the context of the widespread and extensive use of team work in organizations this study analyses the relationship between individual team role preference and styles of managing interpersonal conflict. Data were collected from 26 work teams containing 169 individuals at two times four months apart. Results show that team role preference is related to Dominating, Integrating, Avoiding, Compromising and Obliging conflict management styles. Moreover, two different effects were observed over time. Firstly, at Time 2 an increase in the role clarity (reduction of role ambiguity) of team members was observed. Secondly, time pressure and team learning processes moderated the relationship between team roles and conflict managing style. Results have theoretical as well as practical implications for team building programmes in search of integrative solutions to conflict.

LanguageEnglish
Pages157-182
Number of pages26
JournalInternational Journal of Conflict Management
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

management style
conflict management
Conflict management styles
learning process

Cite this

Aritzeta, Aitor ; Ayestaran, Sabino ; Swailes, Stephen. / Team role preference and conflict management styles. In: International Journal of Conflict Management. 2005 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 157-182.
@article{1665758705b4431a97f7a05087574b91,
title = "Team role preference and conflict management styles",
abstract = "In the context of the widespread and extensive use of team work in organizations this study analyses the relationship between individual team role preference and styles of managing interpersonal conflict. Data were collected from 26 work teams containing 169 individuals at two times four months apart. Results show that team role preference is related to Dominating, Integrating, Avoiding, Compromising and Obliging conflict management styles. Moreover, two different effects were observed over time. Firstly, at Time 2 an increase in the role clarity (reduction of role ambiguity) of team members was observed. Secondly, time pressure and team learning processes moderated the relationship between team roles and conflict managing style. Results have theoretical as well as practical implications for team building programmes in search of integrative solutions to conflict.",
keywords = "Conflict managing styles, Role clarity, Team learning, Team roles",
author = "Aitor Aritzeta and Sabino Ayestaran and Stephen Swailes",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1108/eb022927",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "157--182",
journal = "International Journal of Conflict Management",
issn = "1044-4068",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Team role preference and conflict management styles. / Aritzeta, Aitor; Ayestaran, Sabino; Swailes, Stephen.

In: International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2005, p. 157-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Team role preference and conflict management styles

AU - Aritzeta, Aitor

AU - Ayestaran, Sabino

AU - Swailes, Stephen

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In the context of the widespread and extensive use of team work in organizations this study analyses the relationship between individual team role preference and styles of managing interpersonal conflict. Data were collected from 26 work teams containing 169 individuals at two times four months apart. Results show that team role preference is related to Dominating, Integrating, Avoiding, Compromising and Obliging conflict management styles. Moreover, two different effects were observed over time. Firstly, at Time 2 an increase in the role clarity (reduction of role ambiguity) of team members was observed. Secondly, time pressure and team learning processes moderated the relationship between team roles and conflict managing style. Results have theoretical as well as practical implications for team building programmes in search of integrative solutions to conflict.

AB - In the context of the widespread and extensive use of team work in organizations this study analyses the relationship between individual team role preference and styles of managing interpersonal conflict. Data were collected from 26 work teams containing 169 individuals at two times four months apart. Results show that team role preference is related to Dominating, Integrating, Avoiding, Compromising and Obliging conflict management styles. Moreover, two different effects were observed over time. Firstly, at Time 2 an increase in the role clarity (reduction of role ambiguity) of team members was observed. Secondly, time pressure and team learning processes moderated the relationship between team roles and conflict managing style. Results have theoretical as well as practical implications for team building programmes in search of integrative solutions to conflict.

KW - Conflict managing styles

KW - Role clarity

KW - Team learning

KW - Team roles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846062651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/eb022927

DO - 10.1108/eb022927

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 157

EP - 182

JO - International Journal of Conflict Management

T2 - International Journal of Conflict Management

JF - International Journal of Conflict Management

SN - 1044-4068

IS - 2

ER -