Testing the potential of auto/biographical life history

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: In this paper I describe a methodological experiment designed to test the potential of an auto/biographical (Stanley, 1992) life history narrative. Could it serve a purpose for which it was not originally intended? Specifically, I consider the extent to which a life history articulates with the literature on migration, even though it was not written for this purpose.
Design/methodology/approach: I consider this issue via a series of four narrative vignettes representing the story of this experiment.
Findings: I found that the life history does more than articulate with the migration literature on conceptual distinction. It also animates, supplements and interrogates theories therein about the utility and futility of making distinctions. In this respect the experiment has been a success.
Limitations: This paper has not explicitly engaged with the ethics and politics of employing life history in ways for which it was not intended.
Originality/value: This paper is making a methodological contribution to the area of qualitative research and suggests that multiple analyses might perhaps make life history more attractive to funders.
LanguageEnglish
Pages362-373
JournalQualitative Research Journal
Volume16
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 14 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

experiment
migration
narrative
supplement
qualitative research
moral philosophy
politics
methodology
Values
literature

Cite this

@article{baa2e802b79e4a09ac69f73315a5e9f5,
title = "Testing the potential of auto/biographical life history",
abstract = "Purpose: In this paper I describe a methodological experiment designed to test the potential of an auto/biographical (Stanley, 1992) life history narrative. Could it serve a purpose for which it was not originally intended? Specifically, I consider the extent to which a life history articulates with the literature on migration, even though it was not written for this purpose.Design/methodology/approach: I consider this issue via a series of four narrative vignettes representing the story of this experiment. Findings: I found that the life history does more than articulate with the migration literature on conceptual distinction. It also animates, supplements and interrogates theories therein about the utility and futility of making distinctions. In this respect the experiment has been a success. Limitations: This paper has not explicitly engaged with the ethics and politics of employing life history in ways for which it was not intended.Originality/value: This paper is making a methodological contribution to the area of qualitative research and suggests that multiple analyses might perhaps make life history more attractive to funders.",
keywords = "methodology, qualitative research, life history, migration literature, secondary analysis of data",
author = "Yvonne Downs",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "14",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "362--373",
journal = "Qualitative Research Journal",
issn = "1443-9883",
publisher = "RMIT Publishing",
number = "4",

}

Testing the potential of auto/biographical life history. / Downs, Yvonne.

In: Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. 16, No. 4, 14.11.2016, p. 362-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the potential of auto/biographical life history

AU - Downs, Yvonne

PY - 2016/11/14

Y1 - 2016/11/14

N2 - Purpose: In this paper I describe a methodological experiment designed to test the potential of an auto/biographical (Stanley, 1992) life history narrative. Could it serve a purpose for which it was not originally intended? Specifically, I consider the extent to which a life history articulates with the literature on migration, even though it was not written for this purpose.Design/methodology/approach: I consider this issue via a series of four narrative vignettes representing the story of this experiment. Findings: I found that the life history does more than articulate with the migration literature on conceptual distinction. It also animates, supplements and interrogates theories therein about the utility and futility of making distinctions. In this respect the experiment has been a success. Limitations: This paper has not explicitly engaged with the ethics and politics of employing life history in ways for which it was not intended.Originality/value: This paper is making a methodological contribution to the area of qualitative research and suggests that multiple analyses might perhaps make life history more attractive to funders.

AB - Purpose: In this paper I describe a methodological experiment designed to test the potential of an auto/biographical (Stanley, 1992) life history narrative. Could it serve a purpose for which it was not originally intended? Specifically, I consider the extent to which a life history articulates with the literature on migration, even though it was not written for this purpose.Design/methodology/approach: I consider this issue via a series of four narrative vignettes representing the story of this experiment. Findings: I found that the life history does more than articulate with the migration literature on conceptual distinction. It also animates, supplements and interrogates theories therein about the utility and futility of making distinctions. In this respect the experiment has been a success. Limitations: This paper has not explicitly engaged with the ethics and politics of employing life history in ways for which it was not intended.Originality/value: This paper is making a methodological contribution to the area of qualitative research and suggests that multiple analyses might perhaps make life history more attractive to funders.

KW - methodology

KW - qualitative research

KW - life history

KW - migration literature

KW - secondary analysis of data

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 362

EP - 373

JO - Qualitative Research Journal

T2 - Qualitative Research Journal

JF - Qualitative Research Journal

SN - 1443-9883

IS - 4

ER -