The 1989 Research Selectivity Exercise: A Statistical Analysis of Differences in Research Rating between Universities at the Cost Centre Level

Jill Johnes, Jim Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reviews the outcomes of the 1988/9 UFC research selectivity exercise and uses these as a basis for recommendations to those undertaking the 1992/3 exercise. Attention is drawn to disparities between subjects which may result in inefficient allocations at institutional level. Of eight factors incorporated into a statistical model only size of cost centre is consistently associated with research selectively score. The only other variable that influences an individual cost centre's score in the majority of subject areas is that institution's score in other subjects ‐ thus suggesting a ‘halo’ effect. Surprisingly, research expenditure per member of staff is not strongly associated with reseach selectively rating.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-87
Number of pages21
JournalHigher Education Quarterly
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The 1989 Research Selectivity Exercise: A Statistical Analysis of Differences in Research Rating between Universities at the Cost Centre Level'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this