“The Action to the Word, the Word to the Action”: Reading Hamlet with Cavell and Derrida

David Rudrum, April Lodge, R.M. Christofides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


he writings of Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida share many points of intersection. One of these is their mutual interest in Shakespeare’s Hamlet; another is their (very different) assessments of J.L. Austin’s philosophy, and his concept of performativity. In this paper, we demonstrate that Cavell’s and Derrida’s respective essays on Hamlet offer a surprising insight into their views on Austin’s notion of performativity. Since Hamlet abounds with oaths and promises, testimonies and bearing witness, what is surprising is not that these philosophers should have identified this theme but rather how they respond to it. We show that Derrida’s writings on Hamlet repeatedly draw and depend on the idea of performativity, amounting to a rapprochement with Austin’s concept; and we also show that Cavell questions the effectiveness of performatives in the play, in ways that sometimes resemble Derrida’s invocation of spectrality in the play. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-191
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2016


Dive into the research topics of '“The Action to the Word, the Word to the Action”: Reading Hamlet with Cavell and Derrida'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this