“The Action to the Word, the Word to the Action”: Reading Hamlet with Cavell and Derrida

David Rudrum, April Lodge, R.m. Christofides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

he writings of Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida share many points of intersection. One of these is their mutual interest in Shakespeare’s Hamlet; another is their (very different) assessments of J.L. Austin’s philosophy, and his concept of performativity. In this paper, we demonstrate that Cavell’s and Derrida’s respective essays on Hamlet offer a surprising insight into their views on Austin’s notion of performativity. Since Hamlet abounds with oaths and promises, testimonies and bearing witness, what is surprising is not that these philosophers should have identified this theme but rather how they respond to it. We show that Derrida’s writings on Hamlet repeatedly draw and depend on the idea of performativity, amounting to a rapprochement with Austin’s concept; and we also show that Cavell questions the effectiveness of performatives in the play, in ways that sometimes resemble Derrida’s invocation of spectrality in the play. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
LanguageEnglish
Pages177-191
JournalAngelaki
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

oath
testimony
witness
Group
Hamlet
Jacques Derrida
Performativity
philosophy
Rapprochement
Philosophy
Oaths
William Shakespeare
Testimony
Spectrality
Witness
J. L. Austin
Philosopher
Stanley Cavell

Cite this

Rudrum, David ; Lodge, April ; Christofides, R.m. / “The Action to the Word, the Word to the Action” : Reading Hamlet with Cavell and Derrida. In: Angelaki. 2016 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 177-191.
@article{60d8b44145c843b3a5369fa9c4d235fd,
title = "“The Action to the Word, the Word to the Action”: Reading Hamlet with Cavell and Derrida",
abstract = "he writings of Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida share many points of intersection. One of these is their mutual interest in Shakespeare’s Hamlet; another is their (very different) assessments of J.L. Austin’s philosophy, and his concept of performativity. In this paper, we demonstrate that Cavell’s and Derrida’s respective essays on Hamlet offer a surprising insight into their views on Austin’s notion of performativity. Since Hamlet abounds with oaths and promises, testimonies and bearing witness, what is surprising is not that these philosophers should have identified this theme but rather how they respond to it. We show that Derrida’s writings on Hamlet repeatedly draw and depend on the idea of performativity, amounting to a rapprochement with Austin’s concept; and we also show that Cavell questions the effectiveness of performatives in the play, in ways that sometimes resemble Derrida’s invocation of spectrality in the play. {\circledC} 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
author = "David Rudrum and April Lodge and R.m. Christofides",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/0969725X.2016.1182736",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "177--191",
journal = "Angelaki - Journal of the Theoretical Humanities",
issn = "0969-725X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

“The Action to the Word, the Word to the Action” : Reading Hamlet with Cavell and Derrida. / Rudrum, David; Lodge, April; Christofides, R.m.

In: Angelaki, Vol. 21, No. 2, 02.04.2016, p. 177-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - “The Action to the Word, the Word to the Action”

T2 - Angelaki - Journal of the Theoretical Humanities

AU - Rudrum, David

AU - Lodge, April

AU - Christofides, R.m.

PY - 2016/4/2

Y1 - 2016/4/2

N2 - he writings of Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida share many points of intersection. One of these is their mutual interest in Shakespeare’s Hamlet; another is their (very different) assessments of J.L. Austin’s philosophy, and his concept of performativity. In this paper, we demonstrate that Cavell’s and Derrida’s respective essays on Hamlet offer a surprising insight into their views on Austin’s notion of performativity. Since Hamlet abounds with oaths and promises, testimonies and bearing witness, what is surprising is not that these philosophers should have identified this theme but rather how they respond to it. We show that Derrida’s writings on Hamlet repeatedly draw and depend on the idea of performativity, amounting to a rapprochement with Austin’s concept; and we also show that Cavell questions the effectiveness of performatives in the play, in ways that sometimes resemble Derrida’s invocation of spectrality in the play. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

AB - he writings of Stanley Cavell and Jacques Derrida share many points of intersection. One of these is their mutual interest in Shakespeare’s Hamlet; another is their (very different) assessments of J.L. Austin’s philosophy, and his concept of performativity. In this paper, we demonstrate that Cavell’s and Derrida’s respective essays on Hamlet offer a surprising insight into their views on Austin’s notion of performativity. Since Hamlet abounds with oaths and promises, testimonies and bearing witness, what is surprising is not that these philosophers should have identified this theme but rather how they respond to it. We show that Derrida’s writings on Hamlet repeatedly draw and depend on the idea of performativity, amounting to a rapprochement with Austin’s concept; and we also show that Cavell questions the effectiveness of performatives in the play, in ways that sometimes resemble Derrida’s invocation of spectrality in the play. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

U2 - 10.1080/0969725X.2016.1182736

DO - 10.1080/0969725X.2016.1182736

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 177

EP - 191

JO - Angelaki - Journal of the Theoretical Humanities

JF - Angelaki - Journal of the Theoretical Humanities

SN - 0969-725X

IS - 2

ER -