The assessment of railway track conicity and the question of limit radius

Y. Bezin, A. Alonso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper discusses the calculation of the equivalent conicity for railway wheel and rail profile, particularly the assumption that the radius of a curve can be neglected during the calculation. A simple Matlab program shows that the curve radius term can have an influence on the calculated equivalent conicity, and highlights the importance of defining a limit radius at which equivalent conicity cannot be used as a reliable measure of stability. The work is also supported by vehicle dynamics simulation and a methodology is proposed to show the relationship between dynamics oscillation forces and quasi-static curving forces as a function of curve radius, cant deficiency and vehicle speed. The current limit of 2500m based on EN14363 definition of very large radius curve is proved to be a sensible limit, however results from low speed freight traffic show that dynamic oscillation can also be an issue in tighter radius curve.

LanguageEnglish
Article number55
JournalCivil-Comp Proceedings
Volume98
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rails
Wheels
Computer simulation

Cite this

@article{9d1159f034594e24940fe6c77f9f12f5,
title = "The assessment of railway track conicity and the question of limit radius",
abstract = "This paper discusses the calculation of the equivalent conicity for railway wheel and rail profile, particularly the assumption that the radius of a curve can be neglected during the calculation. A simple Matlab program shows that the curve radius term can have an influence on the calculated equivalent conicity, and highlights the importance of defining a limit radius at which equivalent conicity cannot be used as a reliable measure of stability. The work is also supported by vehicle dynamics simulation and a methodology is proposed to show the relationship between dynamics oscillation forces and quasi-static curving forces as a function of curve radius, cant deficiency and vehicle speed. The current limit of 2500m based on EN14363 definition of very large radius curve is proved to be a sensible limit, however results from low speed freight traffic show that dynamic oscillation can also be an issue in tighter radius curve.",
keywords = "Equivalent conicity, Hunting, Radial steering index, Stability, Track forces, Vehicle dynamics",
author = "Y. Bezin and A. Alonso",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.4203/ccp.98.55",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
journal = "Civil-Comp Proceedings",
issn = "1759-3433",
publisher = "Civil-Comp Press",

}

The assessment of railway track conicity and the question of limit radius. / Bezin, Y.; Alonso, A.

In: Civil-Comp Proceedings, Vol. 98, 55, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The assessment of railway track conicity and the question of limit radius

AU - Bezin, Y.

AU - Alonso, A.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper discusses the calculation of the equivalent conicity for railway wheel and rail profile, particularly the assumption that the radius of a curve can be neglected during the calculation. A simple Matlab program shows that the curve radius term can have an influence on the calculated equivalent conicity, and highlights the importance of defining a limit radius at which equivalent conicity cannot be used as a reliable measure of stability. The work is also supported by vehicle dynamics simulation and a methodology is proposed to show the relationship between dynamics oscillation forces and quasi-static curving forces as a function of curve radius, cant deficiency and vehicle speed. The current limit of 2500m based on EN14363 definition of very large radius curve is proved to be a sensible limit, however results from low speed freight traffic show that dynamic oscillation can also be an issue in tighter radius curve.

AB - This paper discusses the calculation of the equivalent conicity for railway wheel and rail profile, particularly the assumption that the radius of a curve can be neglected during the calculation. A simple Matlab program shows that the curve radius term can have an influence on the calculated equivalent conicity, and highlights the importance of defining a limit radius at which equivalent conicity cannot be used as a reliable measure of stability. The work is also supported by vehicle dynamics simulation and a methodology is proposed to show the relationship between dynamics oscillation forces and quasi-static curving forces as a function of curve radius, cant deficiency and vehicle speed. The current limit of 2500m based on EN14363 definition of very large radius curve is proved to be a sensible limit, however results from low speed freight traffic show that dynamic oscillation can also be an issue in tighter radius curve.

KW - Equivalent conicity

KW - Hunting

KW - Radial steering index

KW - Stability

KW - Track forces

KW - Vehicle dynamics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068463354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4203/ccp.98.55

DO - 10.4203/ccp.98.55

M3 - Article

VL - 98

JO - Civil-Comp Proceedings

T2 - Civil-Comp Proceedings

JF - Civil-Comp Proceedings

SN - 1759-3433

M1 - 55

ER -