The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East–West debate

Dániel Z. Kádár, Helen Spencer-Oatey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Evaluation is an important aspect of (im)politeness, and this article explores it from an interdisciplinary perspective. It starts by considering the East–West debate in politeness theory and argues that both emic and etic approaches to research can contribute usefully to the deliberations. It then maintains that, if we are to understand the impact of culture on people’s (im)politeness evaluations, we need to unpack the concept more thoroughly. It proposes that useful insights can be obtained from Haidt’s (e.g. Haidt & Kesebir, 2010) work on moral foundations and Schwartz’s (e.g. Schwartz et al., 2012) work on basic values. The article ends by revisiting the East–West debate, discussing the potential impact of other factors such as beliefs and ideologies, and noting the ongoing uncertainties over levels and links between the various concepts explored. It urges pragmaticists and psychologists to engage more fully with each other to help address these challenges
LanguageEnglish
Pages73-106
Number of pages34
JournalEast Asian Pragmatics
Volume1
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

politeness
evaluation
value
deliberation
psychologist
Ideologies
uncertainty

Cite this

Kádár, Dániel Z. ; Spencer-Oatey, Helen. / The bases of (im)politeness evaluations : Culture, the moral order and the East–West debate. In: East Asian Pragmatics. 2016 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 73-106.
@article{e14461ff975f4d68945be0c43f1e2395,
title = "The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East–West debate",
abstract = "Evaluation is an important aspect of (im)politeness, and this article explores it from an interdisciplinary perspective. It starts by considering the East–West debate in politeness theory and argues that both emic and etic approaches to research can contribute usefully to the deliberations. It then maintains that, if we are to understand the impact of culture on people’s (im)politeness evaluations, we need to unpack the concept more thoroughly. It proposes that useful insights can be obtained from Haidt’s (e.g. Haidt & Kesebir, 2010) work on moral foundations and Schwartz’s (e.g. Schwartz et al., 2012) work on basic values. The article ends by revisiting the East–West debate, discussing the potential impact of other factors such as beliefs and ideologies, and noting the ongoing uncertainties over levels and links between the various concepts explored. It urges pragmaticists and psychologists to engage more fully with each other to help address these challenges",
keywords = "Linguistics, Politeness, Impolit",
author = "K{\'a}d{\'a}r, {D{\'a}niel Z.} and Helen Spencer-Oatey",
note = "No full text in Eprints HN 11/09/2017",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "73--106",
journal = "East Asian Pragmatics",
issn = "2055-7752",
publisher = "Equinox Publishing Ltd",
number = "1",

}

The bases of (im)politeness evaluations : Culture, the moral order and the East–West debate. / Kádár, Dániel Z.; Spencer-Oatey, Helen.

In: East Asian Pragmatics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2016, p. 73-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The bases of (im)politeness evaluations

T2 - East Asian Pragmatics

AU - Kádár, Dániel Z.

AU - Spencer-Oatey, Helen

N1 - No full text in Eprints HN 11/09/2017

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Evaluation is an important aspect of (im)politeness, and this article explores it from an interdisciplinary perspective. It starts by considering the East–West debate in politeness theory and argues that both emic and etic approaches to research can contribute usefully to the deliberations. It then maintains that, if we are to understand the impact of culture on people’s (im)politeness evaluations, we need to unpack the concept more thoroughly. It proposes that useful insights can be obtained from Haidt’s (e.g. Haidt & Kesebir, 2010) work on moral foundations and Schwartz’s (e.g. Schwartz et al., 2012) work on basic values. The article ends by revisiting the East–West debate, discussing the potential impact of other factors such as beliefs and ideologies, and noting the ongoing uncertainties over levels and links between the various concepts explored. It urges pragmaticists and psychologists to engage more fully with each other to help address these challenges

AB - Evaluation is an important aspect of (im)politeness, and this article explores it from an interdisciplinary perspective. It starts by considering the East–West debate in politeness theory and argues that both emic and etic approaches to research can contribute usefully to the deliberations. It then maintains that, if we are to understand the impact of culture on people’s (im)politeness evaluations, we need to unpack the concept more thoroughly. It proposes that useful insights can be obtained from Haidt’s (e.g. Haidt & Kesebir, 2010) work on moral foundations and Schwartz’s (e.g. Schwartz et al., 2012) work on basic values. The article ends by revisiting the East–West debate, discussing the potential impact of other factors such as beliefs and ideologies, and noting the ongoing uncertainties over levels and links between the various concepts explored. It urges pragmaticists and psychologists to engage more fully with each other to help address these challenges

KW - Linguistics

KW - Politeness

KW - Impolit

UR - https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/EAP/issue/view/2127

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 73

EP - 106

JO - East Asian Pragmatics

JF - East Asian Pragmatics

SN - 2055-7752

IS - 1

ER -