The Basis and Structure of Attitudes: A Critical Evaluation of Experimental, Discursive, and Social Constructionist Psychological Perspectives

Themba Dlamini, Dominic Willmott, Saskia Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This piece will examine the concept of attitudes from three alternative perspectives, exploring which has greater utility for the interpretation and assessment of such governing constructs. Experimental psychologists study attitudes cognitively, arguing for the existence of such an entity. Discursive psychologists argue against the study of 'attitudes', proposing instead those attitudes should be considered as social constructions which occur through language. Notably, social constructionists claim that categories and concepts that people use to understand psychological phenomena and the world around them are historically, culturally, and contextually specific. The many differing viewpoints and explanations put forward from these perspectives are considered here along with assessing how reliable theory and research conducted to date is deemed to be.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-6
Number of pages6
JournalPsychology and Behavioral Science: An International Journal
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

psychologist
evaluation
study attitude
social construction
interpretation
language

Cite this

@article{514117ea8fe445f2a1431d6d01590e7e,
title = "The Basis and Structure of Attitudes: A Critical Evaluation of Experimental, Discursive, and Social Constructionist Psychological Perspectives",
abstract = "This piece will examine the concept of attitudes from three alternative perspectives, exploring which has greater utility for the interpretation and assessment of such governing constructs. Experimental psychologists study attitudes cognitively, arguing for the existence of such an entity. Discursive psychologists argue against the study of 'attitudes', proposing instead those attitudes should be considered as social constructions which occur through language. Notably, social constructionists claim that categories and concepts that people use to understand psychological phenomena and the world around them are historically, culturally, and contextually specific. The many differing viewpoints and explanations put forward from these perspectives are considered here along with assessing how reliable theory and research conducted to date is deemed to be.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Social Cognition, Social Constructions, Discursive Psychology",
author = "Themba Dlamini and Dominic Willmott and Saskia Ryan",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "29",
doi = "10.19080/PBSIJ.2017.06.555680",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Psychology and Behavioral Science: An International Journal",
issn = "2474-7688",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Basis and Structure of Attitudes

T2 - Psychology and Behavioral Science: An International Journal

AU - Dlamini, Themba

AU - Willmott, Dominic

AU - Ryan, Saskia

PY - 2017/8/29

Y1 - 2017/8/29

N2 - This piece will examine the concept of attitudes from three alternative perspectives, exploring which has greater utility for the interpretation and assessment of such governing constructs. Experimental psychologists study attitudes cognitively, arguing for the existence of such an entity. Discursive psychologists argue against the study of 'attitudes', proposing instead those attitudes should be considered as social constructions which occur through language. Notably, social constructionists claim that categories and concepts that people use to understand psychological phenomena and the world around them are historically, culturally, and contextually specific. The many differing viewpoints and explanations put forward from these perspectives are considered here along with assessing how reliable theory and research conducted to date is deemed to be.

AB - This piece will examine the concept of attitudes from three alternative perspectives, exploring which has greater utility for the interpretation and assessment of such governing constructs. Experimental psychologists study attitudes cognitively, arguing for the existence of such an entity. Discursive psychologists argue against the study of 'attitudes', proposing instead those attitudes should be considered as social constructions which occur through language. Notably, social constructionists claim that categories and concepts that people use to understand psychological phenomena and the world around them are historically, culturally, and contextually specific. The many differing viewpoints and explanations put forward from these perspectives are considered here along with assessing how reliable theory and research conducted to date is deemed to be.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Social Cognition

KW - Social Constructions

KW - Discursive Psychology

U2 - 10.19080/PBSIJ.2017.06.555680

DO - 10.19080/PBSIJ.2017.06.555680

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Psychology and Behavioral Science: An International Journal

JF - Psychology and Behavioral Science: An International Journal

SN - 2474-7688

IS - 1

ER -