The case for a victimology of nonhuman animal harms

Melanie Flynn, Matthew D. Hall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For the last twenty years ‘victimology’, the study of crime victims and victimisation has developed markedly. Like its ‘parent’ discipline of criminology, however, very little work has been done in this field around the notion of environmental victimisation. Like criminology itself, victimology has been almost exclusively anthropocentric in its outlook and indeed even more recent discussions of environmental victims – prompted by the development of green criminology – have failed to consider in any depth the victimisation of nonhuman animals. In this paper, we examine the shortfall in provision for and discussions of nonhuman animal victims with reference to Christie’s notion of the ‘ideal victim’ and Boutellier’s concept of the ‘victimalization of morality’. We argue that as victimology has increasingly embraced concepts of victimisation based on ‘social harms’ rather than strict legalistic categorises, its rejection of nonhuman victims from the ambit of study is no longer conceptually or philosophically justified.
LanguageEnglish
Pages299-318
Number of pages20
JournalContemporary Justice Review
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

criminology
animal
victimization
morality
parents
offense

Cite this

Flynn, Melanie ; Hall, Matthew D. / The case for a victimology of nonhuman animal harms. In: Contemporary Justice Review. 2017 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 299-318.
@article{4ae52c0fee0f404d8e804656e50b4735,
title = "The case for a victimology of nonhuman animal harms",
abstract = "For the last twenty years ‘victimology’, the study of crime victims and victimisation has developed markedly. Like its ‘parent’ discipline of criminology, however, very little work has been done in this field around the notion of environmental victimisation. Like criminology itself, victimology has been almost exclusively anthropocentric in its outlook and indeed even more recent discussions of environmental victims – prompted by the development of green criminology – have failed to consider in any depth the victimisation of nonhuman animals. In this paper, we examine the shortfall in provision for and discussions of nonhuman animal victims with reference to Christie’s notion of the ‘ideal victim’ and Boutellier’s concept of the ‘victimalization of morality’. We argue that as victimology has increasingly embraced concepts of victimisation based on ‘social harms’ rather than strict legalistic categorises, its rejection of nonhuman victims from the ambit of study is no longer conceptually or philosophically justified.",
keywords = "Victimology, victims, green criminology, animal law, animal studies, speciesism",
author = "Melanie Flynn and Hall, {Matthew D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/10282580.2017.1348898",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "299--318",
journal = "Contemporary Justice Review",
issn = "1028-2580",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

The case for a victimology of nonhuman animal harms. / Flynn, Melanie; Hall, Matthew D.

In: Contemporary Justice Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, 20.07.2017, p. 299-318.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The case for a victimology of nonhuman animal harms

AU - Flynn, Melanie

AU - Hall, Matthew D.

PY - 2017/7/20

Y1 - 2017/7/20

N2 - For the last twenty years ‘victimology’, the study of crime victims and victimisation has developed markedly. Like its ‘parent’ discipline of criminology, however, very little work has been done in this field around the notion of environmental victimisation. Like criminology itself, victimology has been almost exclusively anthropocentric in its outlook and indeed even more recent discussions of environmental victims – prompted by the development of green criminology – have failed to consider in any depth the victimisation of nonhuman animals. In this paper, we examine the shortfall in provision for and discussions of nonhuman animal victims with reference to Christie’s notion of the ‘ideal victim’ and Boutellier’s concept of the ‘victimalization of morality’. We argue that as victimology has increasingly embraced concepts of victimisation based on ‘social harms’ rather than strict legalistic categorises, its rejection of nonhuman victims from the ambit of study is no longer conceptually or philosophically justified.

AB - For the last twenty years ‘victimology’, the study of crime victims and victimisation has developed markedly. Like its ‘parent’ discipline of criminology, however, very little work has been done in this field around the notion of environmental victimisation. Like criminology itself, victimology has been almost exclusively anthropocentric in its outlook and indeed even more recent discussions of environmental victims – prompted by the development of green criminology – have failed to consider in any depth the victimisation of nonhuman animals. In this paper, we examine the shortfall in provision for and discussions of nonhuman animal victims with reference to Christie’s notion of the ‘ideal victim’ and Boutellier’s concept of the ‘victimalization of morality’. We argue that as victimology has increasingly embraced concepts of victimisation based on ‘social harms’ rather than strict legalistic categorises, its rejection of nonhuman victims from the ambit of study is no longer conceptually or philosophically justified.

KW - Victimology

KW - victims

KW - green criminology

KW - animal law

KW - animal studies

KW - speciesism

U2 - 10.1080/10282580.2017.1348898

DO - 10.1080/10282580.2017.1348898

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 299

EP - 318

JO - Contemporary Justice Review

T2 - Contemporary Justice Review

JF - Contemporary Justice Review

SN - 1028-2580

IS - 3

ER -