For the last twenty years ‘victimology’, the study of crime victims and victimisation has developed markedly. Like its ‘parent’ discipline of criminology, however, very little work has been done in this field around the notion of environmental victimisation. Like criminology itself, victimology has been almost exclusively anthropocentric in its outlook and indeed even more recent discussions of environmental victims – prompted by the development of green criminology – have failed to consider in any depth the victimisation of nonhuman animals. In this paper, we examine the shortfall in provision for and discussions of nonhuman animal victims with reference to Christie’s notion of the ‘ideal victim’ and Boutellier’s concept of the ‘victimalization of morality’. We argue that as victimology has increasingly embraced concepts of victimisation based on ‘social harms’ rather than strict legalistic categorises, its rejection of nonhuman victims from the ambit of study is no longer conceptually or philosophically justified.
|Number of pages||20|
|Journal||Contemporary Justice Review|
|Publication status||Published - 20 Jul 2017|
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'The case for a victimology of nonhuman animal harms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences - Senior Lecturer in Criminology and Policing
- School of Human and Health Sciences
- Applied Criminology and Policing Centre - Member
- Centre for Climate Resilient Societies
- Secure Societies Institute
Veganising Criminology: Crime, harm and victimisation from a vegan perspective
1 Media contribution