The Dangers of Co-witness Familiarity

Investigating the Effects of Co-witness Relationships on Blame Conformity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of pre-existing relationships between co-witnesses on statement similarity, after a post-event discussion. Although research studies have attempted to observe the effect of a pre-existing relationship on eyewitness pairs, few have investigated these effects on larger groups of co-witnesses. Four hundred and twenty participants took part in an eyewitness simulation experiment. Participants were placed into groups of five, and viewed video footage of a bar fight. After witnessing the event, participants discussed the event with group members before giving individual statements privately. The study employed a one-way between subjects design with three conditions: (1) participants discussed the event with familiar co-witnesses, (2) participants discussed the event with unfamiliar co-witnesses and (3) participants were not permitted to discuss the event with their co-witnesses (control). It was found that post-event discussion between co-witnesses increased the level of similarity in blame attribution within the eyewitness groups; however, this difference was only significant in groups where eyewitnesses shared a pre-existing relationship. In addition, the level of uncertainty was reduced when eyewitnesses took part in post-event discussions. It is suggested that this might be attributed to an increased level of informational influence between familiar co-witnesses. However, there was no evidence suggesting that post-event discussions led to an increase in false eyewitness statements.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)316-326
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Police and Criminal Psychology
Volume33
Issue number4
Early online date22 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

conformity
witness
Uncertainty
event
Research
Group
Recognition (Psychology)
group membership
attribution
video
uncertainty
simulation
experiment

Cite this

@article{2e15f92dfa614ce1abbb6d1812442f86,
title = "The Dangers of Co-witness Familiarity: Investigating the Effects of Co-witness Relationships on Blame Conformity",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of pre-existing relationships between co-witnesses on statement similarity, after a post-event discussion. Although research studies have attempted to observe the effect of a pre-existing relationship on eyewitness pairs, few have investigated these effects on larger groups of co-witnesses. Four hundred and twenty participants took part in an eyewitness simulation experiment. Participants were placed into groups of five, and viewed video footage of a bar fight. After witnessing the event, participants discussed the event with group members before giving individual statements privately. The study employed a one-way between subjects design with three conditions: (1) participants discussed the event with familiar co-witnesses, (2) participants discussed the event with unfamiliar co-witnesses and (3) participants were not permitted to discuss the event with their co-witnesses (control). It was found that post-event discussion between co-witnesses increased the level of similarity in blame attribution within the eyewitness groups; however, this difference was only significant in groups where eyewitnesses shared a pre-existing relationship. In addition, the level of uncertainty was reduced when eyewitnesses took part in post-event discussions. It is suggested that this might be attributed to an increased level of informational influence between familiar co-witnesses. However, there was no evidence suggesting that post-event discussions led to an increase in false eyewitness statements.",
keywords = "Blame attribution, Conformity, Eyewitness, Eyewitness relationships, Statement similarity",
author = "Dara Mojtahedi and Maria Ioannou and Laura Hammond",
note = "This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9254-4",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11896-018-9254-4",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "316--326",
journal = "Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology",
issn = "0882-0783",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Dangers of Co-witness Familiarity

T2 - Investigating the Effects of Co-witness Relationships on Blame Conformity

AU - Mojtahedi, Dara

AU - Ioannou, Maria

AU - Hammond, Laura

N1 - This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9254-4

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of pre-existing relationships between co-witnesses on statement similarity, after a post-event discussion. Although research studies have attempted to observe the effect of a pre-existing relationship on eyewitness pairs, few have investigated these effects on larger groups of co-witnesses. Four hundred and twenty participants took part in an eyewitness simulation experiment. Participants were placed into groups of five, and viewed video footage of a bar fight. After witnessing the event, participants discussed the event with group members before giving individual statements privately. The study employed a one-way between subjects design with three conditions: (1) participants discussed the event with familiar co-witnesses, (2) participants discussed the event with unfamiliar co-witnesses and (3) participants were not permitted to discuss the event with their co-witnesses (control). It was found that post-event discussion between co-witnesses increased the level of similarity in blame attribution within the eyewitness groups; however, this difference was only significant in groups where eyewitnesses shared a pre-existing relationship. In addition, the level of uncertainty was reduced when eyewitnesses took part in post-event discussions. It is suggested that this might be attributed to an increased level of informational influence between familiar co-witnesses. However, there was no evidence suggesting that post-event discussions led to an increase in false eyewitness statements.

AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of pre-existing relationships between co-witnesses on statement similarity, after a post-event discussion. Although research studies have attempted to observe the effect of a pre-existing relationship on eyewitness pairs, few have investigated these effects on larger groups of co-witnesses. Four hundred and twenty participants took part in an eyewitness simulation experiment. Participants were placed into groups of five, and viewed video footage of a bar fight. After witnessing the event, participants discussed the event with group members before giving individual statements privately. The study employed a one-way between subjects design with three conditions: (1) participants discussed the event with familiar co-witnesses, (2) participants discussed the event with unfamiliar co-witnesses and (3) participants were not permitted to discuss the event with their co-witnesses (control). It was found that post-event discussion between co-witnesses increased the level of similarity in blame attribution within the eyewitness groups; however, this difference was only significant in groups where eyewitnesses shared a pre-existing relationship. In addition, the level of uncertainty was reduced when eyewitnesses took part in post-event discussions. It is suggested that this might be attributed to an increased level of informational influence between familiar co-witnesses. However, there was no evidence suggesting that post-event discussions led to an increase in false eyewitness statements.

KW - Blame attribution

KW - Conformity

KW - Eyewitness

KW - Eyewitness relationships

KW - Statement similarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055949358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11896-018-9254-4

DO - 10.1007/s11896-018-9254-4

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 316

EP - 326

JO - Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

JF - Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

SN - 0882-0783

IS - 4

ER -