The dependent consumer: reflections on accounts of the risks of non-prescription medicines

Paul Bissell, Paul R Ward, Peter R Noyce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although academic writing about risk as a conceptual and theoretical category has burgeoned in recent years, debates about the characteristics of the risk society have tended to by-pass more mundane but ubiquitous dimensions of health and health-related behaviour. In this article, we argue that focusing on lay people’s understanding of the risks of a relatively commonplace example of modern medical technology (the use of non-prescription medicines for the self-medication of minor ailments) provides an insight and a challenge to what theorists of the risk society have described as the existential contours of life in late modernity.

In the context of an empirical study detailing consumer responses to a naturally occurring risk, we explore some of the arguments proposed by Ulrich Beck and amplified by Anthony Giddens concerning the characteristics of the risk society. We provide evidence both for and against the propositions described by these authors and posit a more nuanced understanding of the risks of scientific medicine which acknowledges both lay expertise over medicines usage coupled with dependence on medicine and medical technology as forms of healing.
LanguageEnglish
Pages5-30
Number of pages26
JournalHealth
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

risk society
medicine
medical technology
self-medication
health
modernity
Medicine
expertise
Technology
Self Medication
Health
evidence

Cite this

Bissell, Paul ; Ward, Paul R ; Noyce, Peter R. / The dependent consumer : reflections on accounts of the risks of non-prescription medicines. In: Health. 2001 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 5-30.
@article{d70471d232964ce79d1ed6911ff282dc,
title = "The dependent consumer: reflections on accounts of the risks of non-prescription medicines",
abstract = "Although academic writing about risk as a conceptual and theoretical category has burgeoned in recent years, debates about the characteristics of the risk society have tended to by-pass more mundane but ubiquitous dimensions of health and health-related behaviour. In this article, we argue that focusing on lay people’s understanding of the risks of a relatively commonplace example of modern medical technology (the use of non-prescription medicines for the self-medication of minor ailments) provides an insight and a challenge to what theorists of the risk society have described as the existential contours of life in late modernity.In the context of an empirical study detailing consumer responses to a naturally occurring risk, we explore some of the arguments proposed by Ulrich Beck and amplified by Anthony Giddens concerning the characteristics of the risk society. We provide evidence both for and against the propositions described by these authors and posit a more nuanced understanding of the risks of scientific medicine which acknowledges both lay expertise over medicines usage coupled with dependence on medicine and medical technology as forms of healing.",
keywords = "community pharmacy, dependence, lay expertise, non-prescription medicines, risk",
author = "Paul Bissell and Ward, {Paul R} and Noyce, {Peter R}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/136345930100500101",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "5--30",
journal = "Health (United Kingdom)",
issn = "1363-4593",
publisher = "Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England",
number = "1",

}

The dependent consumer : reflections on accounts of the risks of non-prescription medicines. / Bissell, Paul; Ward, Paul R; Noyce, Peter R.

In: Health, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 5-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dependent consumer

T2 - Health (United Kingdom)

AU - Bissell, Paul

AU - Ward, Paul R

AU - Noyce, Peter R

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Although academic writing about risk as a conceptual and theoretical category has burgeoned in recent years, debates about the characteristics of the risk society have tended to by-pass more mundane but ubiquitous dimensions of health and health-related behaviour. In this article, we argue that focusing on lay people’s understanding of the risks of a relatively commonplace example of modern medical technology (the use of non-prescription medicines for the self-medication of minor ailments) provides an insight and a challenge to what theorists of the risk society have described as the existential contours of life in late modernity.In the context of an empirical study detailing consumer responses to a naturally occurring risk, we explore some of the arguments proposed by Ulrich Beck and amplified by Anthony Giddens concerning the characteristics of the risk society. We provide evidence both for and against the propositions described by these authors and posit a more nuanced understanding of the risks of scientific medicine which acknowledges both lay expertise over medicines usage coupled with dependence on medicine and medical technology as forms of healing.

AB - Although academic writing about risk as a conceptual and theoretical category has burgeoned in recent years, debates about the characteristics of the risk society have tended to by-pass more mundane but ubiquitous dimensions of health and health-related behaviour. In this article, we argue that focusing on lay people’s understanding of the risks of a relatively commonplace example of modern medical technology (the use of non-prescription medicines for the self-medication of minor ailments) provides an insight and a challenge to what theorists of the risk society have described as the existential contours of life in late modernity.In the context of an empirical study detailing consumer responses to a naturally occurring risk, we explore some of the arguments proposed by Ulrich Beck and amplified by Anthony Giddens concerning the characteristics of the risk society. We provide evidence both for and against the propositions described by these authors and posit a more nuanced understanding of the risks of scientific medicine which acknowledges both lay expertise over medicines usage coupled with dependence on medicine and medical technology as forms of healing.

KW - community pharmacy

KW - dependence

KW - lay expertise

KW - non-prescription medicines

KW - risk

U2 - 10.1177/136345930100500101

DO - 10.1177/136345930100500101

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 5

EP - 30

JO - Health (United Kingdom)

JF - Health (United Kingdom)

SN - 1363-4593

IS - 1

ER -