The Development of ICD Adaptations and Modifications as Background to a Potential Saudi Arabia's National Version

Musaed Alharbi, Godfrey Isouard, Barry Tolchard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Modified national versions of the WHO’s International Statistical Classification of Diseases, current version ICD-10 with ICD-11 coming into effect in January 2022, have become the standard in many countries for diagnosis and procedure coding to facilitate the submission of medical billing and reimbursement by health insurers. The WHO ICD-10 exists purely as a coded classification of disease. It has no related classification of procedures and lacks the clinical level of diagnostic specificity necessary for the documentation of individual clinical cases and the associated prescribed therapies and interventions, particularly surgical cases. Historically, the US clinical modification of ICD-9, known as ICD-9-CM, established the trend. Australia adopted ICD-9-CM, later adapted it to Australian clinical specifications, and after the launch of the WHO ICD-10 produced the current Australian modification ICD-10-AM, used under license by many other countries. This paper examines a work in progress, rather than offering an academic critique, to illustrate the evolution of national clinical modification with particular reference to those of the United States, Australia and Thailand. The selection is based on the historical ICD-9-CM connection of the US and Australia, and the fact that Thailand is a more advanced developing nation like Saudi Arabia. The study parameters include the Saudi national healthcare system which has not previously employed a classification clinical coding, despite the wealthy developing healthcare system. Nations using their own modification face the burden of upgrading. Saudi Arabia plans to implement the national Australian modification, rather than creating a Saudi national modification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-167
Number of pages10
JournalGlobal journal of health science
Volume11
Issue number11
Early online date19 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Saudi Arabia
International Classification of Diseases
Thailand
Delivery of Health Care
Insurance Carriers
Licensure
Clinical Coding
Documentation
Developing Countries
Health

Cite this

@article{054a486879c44c3cb984b1533a47d673,
title = "The Development of ICD Adaptations and Modifications as Background to a Potential Saudi Arabia's National Version",
abstract = "Modified national versions of the WHO’s International Statistical Classification of Diseases, current version ICD-10 with ICD-11 coming into effect in January 2022, have become the standard in many countries for diagnosis and procedure coding to facilitate the submission of medical billing and reimbursement by health insurers. The WHO ICD-10 exists purely as a coded classification of disease. It has no related classification of procedures and lacks the clinical level of diagnostic specificity necessary for the documentation of individual clinical cases and the associated prescribed therapies and interventions, particularly surgical cases. Historically, the US clinical modification of ICD-9, known as ICD-9-CM, established the trend. Australia adopted ICD-9-CM, later adapted it to Australian clinical specifications, and after the launch of the WHO ICD-10 produced the current Australian modification ICD-10-AM, used under license by many other countries. This paper examines a work in progress, rather than offering an academic critique, to illustrate the evolution of national clinical modification with particular reference to those of the United States, Australia and Thailand. The selection is based on the historical ICD-9-CM connection of the US and Australia, and the fact that Thailand is a more advanced developing nation like Saudi Arabia. The study parameters include the Saudi national healthcare system which has not previously employed a classification clinical coding, despite the wealthy developing healthcare system. Nations using their own modification face the burden of upgrading. Saudi Arabia plans to implement the national Australian modification, rather than creating a Saudi national modification.",
keywords = "clinical coding, clinical modification, ICD-10, WHO, national modification",
author = "Musaed Alharbi and Godfrey Isouard and Barry Tolchard",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5539/gjhs.v11n11p158",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "158--167",
journal = "Global journal of health science",
issn = "1916-9736",
publisher = "Canadian Center of Science and Education",
number = "11",

}

The Development of ICD Adaptations and Modifications as Background to a Potential Saudi Arabia's National Version. / Alharbi, Musaed; Isouard, Godfrey; Tolchard, Barry.

In: Global journal of health science, Vol. 11, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. 158-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Development of ICD Adaptations and Modifications as Background to a Potential Saudi Arabia's National Version

AU - Alharbi, Musaed

AU - Isouard, Godfrey

AU - Tolchard, Barry

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Modified national versions of the WHO’s International Statistical Classification of Diseases, current version ICD-10 with ICD-11 coming into effect in January 2022, have become the standard in many countries for diagnosis and procedure coding to facilitate the submission of medical billing and reimbursement by health insurers. The WHO ICD-10 exists purely as a coded classification of disease. It has no related classification of procedures and lacks the clinical level of diagnostic specificity necessary for the documentation of individual clinical cases and the associated prescribed therapies and interventions, particularly surgical cases. Historically, the US clinical modification of ICD-9, known as ICD-9-CM, established the trend. Australia adopted ICD-9-CM, later adapted it to Australian clinical specifications, and after the launch of the WHO ICD-10 produced the current Australian modification ICD-10-AM, used under license by many other countries. This paper examines a work in progress, rather than offering an academic critique, to illustrate the evolution of national clinical modification with particular reference to those of the United States, Australia and Thailand. The selection is based on the historical ICD-9-CM connection of the US and Australia, and the fact that Thailand is a more advanced developing nation like Saudi Arabia. The study parameters include the Saudi national healthcare system which has not previously employed a classification clinical coding, despite the wealthy developing healthcare system. Nations using their own modification face the burden of upgrading. Saudi Arabia plans to implement the national Australian modification, rather than creating a Saudi national modification.

AB - Modified national versions of the WHO’s International Statistical Classification of Diseases, current version ICD-10 with ICD-11 coming into effect in January 2022, have become the standard in many countries for diagnosis and procedure coding to facilitate the submission of medical billing and reimbursement by health insurers. The WHO ICD-10 exists purely as a coded classification of disease. It has no related classification of procedures and lacks the clinical level of diagnostic specificity necessary for the documentation of individual clinical cases and the associated prescribed therapies and interventions, particularly surgical cases. Historically, the US clinical modification of ICD-9, known as ICD-9-CM, established the trend. Australia adopted ICD-9-CM, later adapted it to Australian clinical specifications, and after the launch of the WHO ICD-10 produced the current Australian modification ICD-10-AM, used under license by many other countries. This paper examines a work in progress, rather than offering an academic critique, to illustrate the evolution of national clinical modification with particular reference to those of the United States, Australia and Thailand. The selection is based on the historical ICD-9-CM connection of the US and Australia, and the fact that Thailand is a more advanced developing nation like Saudi Arabia. The study parameters include the Saudi national healthcare system which has not previously employed a classification clinical coding, despite the wealthy developing healthcare system. Nations using their own modification face the burden of upgrading. Saudi Arabia plans to implement the national Australian modification, rather than creating a Saudi national modification.

KW - clinical coding

KW - clinical modification

KW - ICD-10

KW - WHO

KW - national modification

U2 - 10.5539/gjhs.v11n11p158

DO - 10.5539/gjhs.v11n11p158

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 158

EP - 167

JO - Global journal of health science

JF - Global journal of health science

SN - 1916-9736

IS - 11

ER -