Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Effectiveness of Interventions for Drug-Using Offenders in the Courts, Secure Establishments and the Community: A systematic review

Amanda E. Perry, Zoe Darwin, Christine Godfrey, Cynthia McDougall, Judith Lunn, Julie Glanville, Simon Coulton

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Interventions for drug-using offenders are employed internationally to reduce subsequent drug use and criminal behavior. This paper provides information from a systematic review of 24 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted between 1980 and 2004. Thirteen of the 24 trials were included in a series of meta-analyses, and tentative conclusions are drawn on the basis of the evidence. Pretrial release with drugs testing and intensive supervision were shown to have limited success when compared to routine parole and probation, with effect sizes favoring routine parole and probation. Therapeutic community interventions showed promising results when compared to dispensation of treatment to individuals as usual, reducing risk of future offending behavior. A few studies evaluated the effectiveness of assertive case management and other community-based programs, but due to the paucity of information few inferences could be drawn from these studies. Little is known about the cost and cost effectiveness of such interventions, and the development of established protocols is required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)374-400
Number of pages27
JournalSubstance Use and Misuse
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2009
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Effectiveness of Interventions for Drug-Using Offenders in the Courts, Secure Establishments and the Community: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this