The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task

Kristin M. Finkbeiner, Kyle Wilson, Paul N. Russell, William S. Helton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Performance on the sustained attention to response task (SART) is often characterized by a speed–accuracy trade-off, and SART performance may be influenced by strategic factors (Head and Helton Conscious Cogn 22: 913–919, 2013). Previous research indicates a significant difference between reliable and unreliable warning cues on response times and errors (commission and omission), suggesting that SART tasks are influenced by strategic factors (Helton et al. Conscious Cogn 20: 1732–1737, 2011; Exp Brain Res 209: 401–407, 2011). With regards to warning stimuli, we chose to use cute images (exhibiting infantile features) during a SART, as previous literature indicates cute images cause participants to engage attention. If viewing cute things makes the viewer exert more attention than normal, then exposure to cute stimuli during the SART should improve performance if SART performance is a measure of perceptual coupling. Reliable warning cues were shown to reduce both response time and errors of commission, and increase errors of omission, relative to unreliable warning cues. Cuteness of the warning stimuli, however, had no significant effect on SART performance. These results suggest the importance of strategic factors in SART performance, not increased attention, and add to the growing literature which suggests the SART is not a good measure of sustained attention, vigilance or perceptual coupling.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1061-1068
Number of pages8
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume233
Issue number4
Early online date24 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cues
Task Performance and Analysis
Reaction Time
Head
Brain

Cite this

Finkbeiner, Kristin M. ; Wilson, Kyle ; Russell, Paul N. ; Helton, William S. / The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2015 ; Vol. 233, No. 4. pp. 1061-1068.
@article{580c108e67224959abbdde65b2fd17c5,
title = "The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task",
abstract = "Performance on the sustained attention to response task (SART) is often characterized by a speed–accuracy trade-off, and SART performance may be influenced by strategic factors (Head and Helton Conscious Cogn 22: 913–919, 2013). Previous research indicates a significant difference between reliable and unreliable warning cues on response times and errors (commission and omission), suggesting that SART tasks are influenced by strategic factors (Helton et al. Conscious Cogn 20: 1732–1737, 2011; Exp Brain Res 209: 401–407, 2011). With regards to warning stimuli, we chose to use cute images (exhibiting infantile features) during a SART, as previous literature indicates cute images cause participants to engage attention. If viewing cute things makes the viewer exert more attention than normal, then exposure to cute stimuli during the SART should improve performance if SART performance is a measure of perceptual coupling. Reliable warning cues were shown to reduce both response time and errors of commission, and increase errors of omission, relative to unreliable warning cues. Cuteness of the warning stimuli, however, had no significant effect on SART performance. These results suggest the importance of strategic factors in SART performance, not increased attention, and add to the growing literature which suggests the SART is not a good measure of sustained attention, vigilance or perceptual coupling.",
keywords = "SART, Warning cues, Predictive, Cute",
author = "Finkbeiner, {Kristin M.} and Kyle Wilson and Russell, {Paul N.} and Helton, {William S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-014-4179-3",
language = "English",
volume = "233",
pages = "1061--1068",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task. / Finkbeiner, Kristin M.; Wilson, Kyle; Russell, Paul N.; Helton, William S.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 233, No. 4, 04.2015, p. 1061-1068.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task

AU - Finkbeiner, Kristin M.

AU - Wilson, Kyle

AU - Russell, Paul N.

AU - Helton, William S.

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - Performance on the sustained attention to response task (SART) is often characterized by a speed–accuracy trade-off, and SART performance may be influenced by strategic factors (Head and Helton Conscious Cogn 22: 913–919, 2013). Previous research indicates a significant difference between reliable and unreliable warning cues on response times and errors (commission and omission), suggesting that SART tasks are influenced by strategic factors (Helton et al. Conscious Cogn 20: 1732–1737, 2011; Exp Brain Res 209: 401–407, 2011). With regards to warning stimuli, we chose to use cute images (exhibiting infantile features) during a SART, as previous literature indicates cute images cause participants to engage attention. If viewing cute things makes the viewer exert more attention than normal, then exposure to cute stimuli during the SART should improve performance if SART performance is a measure of perceptual coupling. Reliable warning cues were shown to reduce both response time and errors of commission, and increase errors of omission, relative to unreliable warning cues. Cuteness of the warning stimuli, however, had no significant effect on SART performance. These results suggest the importance of strategic factors in SART performance, not increased attention, and add to the growing literature which suggests the SART is not a good measure of sustained attention, vigilance or perceptual coupling.

AB - Performance on the sustained attention to response task (SART) is often characterized by a speed–accuracy trade-off, and SART performance may be influenced by strategic factors (Head and Helton Conscious Cogn 22: 913–919, 2013). Previous research indicates a significant difference between reliable and unreliable warning cues on response times and errors (commission and omission), suggesting that SART tasks are influenced by strategic factors (Helton et al. Conscious Cogn 20: 1732–1737, 2011; Exp Brain Res 209: 401–407, 2011). With regards to warning stimuli, we chose to use cute images (exhibiting infantile features) during a SART, as previous literature indicates cute images cause participants to engage attention. If viewing cute things makes the viewer exert more attention than normal, then exposure to cute stimuli during the SART should improve performance if SART performance is a measure of perceptual coupling. Reliable warning cues were shown to reduce both response time and errors of commission, and increase errors of omission, relative to unreliable warning cues. Cuteness of the warning stimuli, however, had no significant effect on SART performance. These results suggest the importance of strategic factors in SART performance, not increased attention, and add to the growing literature which suggests the SART is not a good measure of sustained attention, vigilance or perceptual coupling.

KW - SART

KW - Warning cues

KW - Predictive

KW - Cute

UR - https://link.springer.com/journal/221

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-014-4179-3

DO - 10.1007/s00221-014-4179-3

M3 - Article

VL - 233

SP - 1061

EP - 1068

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 4

ER -