The Efficacy of Ideographic Models for Geographical Offender Profiling

David Canter, Laura Hammond, Donna Youngs, Piotr Juszczak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Current 'geographical offender profiling' methods that predict an offender's base location from information about where he commits his crimes have been limited by being based on aggregate distributions across a number of offenders, restricting their responsiveness to variations between individuals as well as the possibility of axially distorted distributions. The efficacy of five ideographic models (derived only from individual crime series) was therefore tested. Methods: A dataset of 63 burglary series from the UK was analysed using five different ideographic models to make predictions of the likely location of an offenders home/base: (1) a Gaussian-based density analysis (kernel density estimation); (2) a regression-based analysis; (3) an application of the 'Circle Hypothesis'; (4) a mixed Gaussian method; and (5) a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) analysis. These tests were carried out by incorporating the models into a new version of the widely utilised Dragnet geographical profiling system DragNetP. The efficacy of the models was determined using both distance and area measures. Results: Results were compared between the different models and with previously reported findings employing nomothetic algorithms, Bayesian approaches and human judges. Overall the ideographic models performed better than alternate strategies and human judges. Each model was optimal for some crime series, no one model producing the best results for all series. Conclusions: Although restricted to one limited sample the current study does show that these offenders vary considerably in the spatial distribution of offence location choice. This points to important differences between offenders in the morphology of their crime location choice. Mathematical models therefore need to take this into account. Such models, which do not draw on any aggregate distributions, will improve geographically based investigative decision support systems.

LanguageEnglish
Pages423-446
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Quantitative Criminology
Volume29
Issue number3
Early online date30 Sep 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2013

Fingerprint

offender
Crime
offense
Spatial Analysis
Bayes Theorem
Theoretical Models
Regression Analysis
regression

Cite this

Canter, David ; Hammond, Laura ; Youngs, Donna ; Juszczak, Piotr. / The Efficacy of Ideographic Models for Geographical Offender Profiling. In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 2013 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 423-446.
@article{a726aa9c99514f4cbbf2c7ba832abb1e,
title = "The Efficacy of Ideographic Models for Geographical Offender Profiling",
abstract = "Objectives: Current 'geographical offender profiling' methods that predict an offender's base location from information about where he commits his crimes have been limited by being based on aggregate distributions across a number of offenders, restricting their responsiveness to variations between individuals as well as the possibility of axially distorted distributions. The efficacy of five ideographic models (derived only from individual crime series) was therefore tested. Methods: A dataset of 63 burglary series from the UK was analysed using five different ideographic models to make predictions of the likely location of an offenders home/base: (1) a Gaussian-based density analysis (kernel density estimation); (2) a regression-based analysis; (3) an application of the 'Circle Hypothesis'; (4) a mixed Gaussian method; and (5) a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) analysis. These tests were carried out by incorporating the models into a new version of the widely utilised Dragnet geographical profiling system DragNetP. The efficacy of the models was determined using both distance and area measures. Results: Results were compared between the different models and with previously reported findings employing nomothetic algorithms, Bayesian approaches and human judges. Overall the ideographic models performed better than alternate strategies and human judges. Each model was optimal for some crime series, no one model producing the best results for all series. Conclusions: Although restricted to one limited sample the current study does show that these offenders vary considerably in the spatial distribution of offence location choice. This points to important differences between offenders in the morphology of their crime location choice. Mathematical models therefore need to take this into account. Such models, which do not draw on any aggregate distributions, will improve geographically based investigative decision support systems.",
keywords = "Burglary, Criminal spatial behaviour, Dragnet, Geographical profiling, Ideographic models",
author = "David Canter and Laura Hammond and Donna Youngs and Piotr Juszczak",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10940-012-9186-6",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "423--446",
journal = "Journal of Quantitative Criminology",
issn = "0748-4518",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

The Efficacy of Ideographic Models for Geographical Offender Profiling. / Canter, David; Hammond, Laura; Youngs, Donna; Juszczak, Piotr.

In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 423-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Efficacy of Ideographic Models for Geographical Offender Profiling

AU - Canter, David

AU - Hammond, Laura

AU - Youngs, Donna

AU - Juszczak, Piotr

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Objectives: Current 'geographical offender profiling' methods that predict an offender's base location from information about where he commits his crimes have been limited by being based on aggregate distributions across a number of offenders, restricting their responsiveness to variations between individuals as well as the possibility of axially distorted distributions. The efficacy of five ideographic models (derived only from individual crime series) was therefore tested. Methods: A dataset of 63 burglary series from the UK was analysed using five different ideographic models to make predictions of the likely location of an offenders home/base: (1) a Gaussian-based density analysis (kernel density estimation); (2) a regression-based analysis; (3) an application of the 'Circle Hypothesis'; (4) a mixed Gaussian method; and (5) a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) analysis. These tests were carried out by incorporating the models into a new version of the widely utilised Dragnet geographical profiling system DragNetP. The efficacy of the models was determined using both distance and area measures. Results: Results were compared between the different models and with previously reported findings employing nomothetic algorithms, Bayesian approaches and human judges. Overall the ideographic models performed better than alternate strategies and human judges. Each model was optimal for some crime series, no one model producing the best results for all series. Conclusions: Although restricted to one limited sample the current study does show that these offenders vary considerably in the spatial distribution of offence location choice. This points to important differences between offenders in the morphology of their crime location choice. Mathematical models therefore need to take this into account. Such models, which do not draw on any aggregate distributions, will improve geographically based investigative decision support systems.

AB - Objectives: Current 'geographical offender profiling' methods that predict an offender's base location from information about where he commits his crimes have been limited by being based on aggregate distributions across a number of offenders, restricting their responsiveness to variations between individuals as well as the possibility of axially distorted distributions. The efficacy of five ideographic models (derived only from individual crime series) was therefore tested. Methods: A dataset of 63 burglary series from the UK was analysed using five different ideographic models to make predictions of the likely location of an offenders home/base: (1) a Gaussian-based density analysis (kernel density estimation); (2) a regression-based analysis; (3) an application of the 'Circle Hypothesis'; (4) a mixed Gaussian method; and (5) a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) analysis. These tests were carried out by incorporating the models into a new version of the widely utilised Dragnet geographical profiling system DragNetP. The efficacy of the models was determined using both distance and area measures. Results: Results were compared between the different models and with previously reported findings employing nomothetic algorithms, Bayesian approaches and human judges. Overall the ideographic models performed better than alternate strategies and human judges. Each model was optimal for some crime series, no one model producing the best results for all series. Conclusions: Although restricted to one limited sample the current study does show that these offenders vary considerably in the spatial distribution of offence location choice. This points to important differences between offenders in the morphology of their crime location choice. Mathematical models therefore need to take this into account. Such models, which do not draw on any aggregate distributions, will improve geographically based investigative decision support systems.

KW - Burglary

KW - Criminal spatial behaviour

KW - Dragnet

KW - Geographical profiling

KW - Ideographic models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882838947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10940-012-9186-6

DO - 10.1007/s10940-012-9186-6

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 423

EP - 446

JO - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

T2 - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

JF - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

SN - 0748-4518

IS - 3

ER -