The ethics and politics of private automobile use

Julia Meaton, David Motrice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite growing awareness of its various problems, private automobile use is still seen as an inviolable individual freedom. We consider the ethical arguments for and against private automobile use with particular reference to John Stuart Mill's theory of freedom. There is much evidence to show that private automobile use is an other-regarding harmful activity that is, therefore, on Mill's terms, liable to public control. Although it cannot be an entirely self-regarding activity, we consider private automobile use in this category and argue that even on Mill's terms it can properly be subjected to extensive control. We also challenge Mill's theory and argue that private automobile use lacks adequate moral justification. We then consider the policy implications of this ethical argument and review some of the policy options available. We conclude that although an immediate total ban on private automobile use is justifiable, it is inadvisable at this time and that more limited, but effective control should be implemented in preparation for a total ban.

LanguageEnglish
Pages39-54
Number of pages16
JournalEnvironmental Ethics
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1996

Fingerprint

ethics
automobile
politics
mill
Automobile

Cite this

Meaton, Julia ; Motrice, David. / The ethics and politics of private automobile use. In: Environmental Ethics. 1996 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 39-54.
@article{6de70b76242e4c6a8591906a8c2edcd2,
title = "The ethics and politics of private automobile use",
abstract = "Despite growing awareness of its various problems, private automobile use is still seen as an inviolable individual freedom. We consider the ethical arguments for and against private automobile use with particular reference to John Stuart Mill's theory of freedom. There is much evidence to show that private automobile use is an other-regarding harmful activity that is, therefore, on Mill's terms, liable to public control. Although it cannot be an entirely self-regarding activity, we consider private automobile use in this category and argue that even on Mill's terms it can properly be subjected to extensive control. We also challenge Mill's theory and argue that private automobile use lacks adequate moral justification. We then consider the policy implications of this ethical argument and review some of the policy options available. We conclude that although an immediate total ban on private automobile use is justifiable, it is inadvisable at this time and that more limited, but effective control should be implemented in preparation for a total ban.",
author = "Julia Meaton and David Motrice",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5840/enviroethics199618140",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "39--54",
journal = "Environmental Ethics",
issn = "0163-4275",
publisher = "Environmental Philosophy Inc",
number = "1",

}

The ethics and politics of private automobile use. / Meaton, Julia; Motrice, David.

In: Environmental Ethics, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 39-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ethics and politics of private automobile use

AU - Meaton, Julia

AU - Motrice, David

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Despite growing awareness of its various problems, private automobile use is still seen as an inviolable individual freedom. We consider the ethical arguments for and against private automobile use with particular reference to John Stuart Mill's theory of freedom. There is much evidence to show that private automobile use is an other-regarding harmful activity that is, therefore, on Mill's terms, liable to public control. Although it cannot be an entirely self-regarding activity, we consider private automobile use in this category and argue that even on Mill's terms it can properly be subjected to extensive control. We also challenge Mill's theory and argue that private automobile use lacks adequate moral justification. We then consider the policy implications of this ethical argument and review some of the policy options available. We conclude that although an immediate total ban on private automobile use is justifiable, it is inadvisable at this time and that more limited, but effective control should be implemented in preparation for a total ban.

AB - Despite growing awareness of its various problems, private automobile use is still seen as an inviolable individual freedom. We consider the ethical arguments for and against private automobile use with particular reference to John Stuart Mill's theory of freedom. There is much evidence to show that private automobile use is an other-regarding harmful activity that is, therefore, on Mill's terms, liable to public control. Although it cannot be an entirely self-regarding activity, we consider private automobile use in this category and argue that even on Mill's terms it can properly be subjected to extensive control. We also challenge Mill's theory and argue that private automobile use lacks adequate moral justification. We then consider the policy implications of this ethical argument and review some of the policy options available. We conclude that although an immediate total ban on private automobile use is justifiable, it is inadvisable at this time and that more limited, but effective control should be implemented in preparation for a total ban.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0005901827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5840/enviroethics199618140

DO - 10.5840/enviroethics199618140

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 39

EP - 54

JO - Environmental Ethics

T2 - Environmental Ethics

JF - Environmental Ethics

SN - 0163-4275

IS - 1

ER -