The experiences of sexually assaulted people attending Saint Mary's Sexual Assault Referral Centre for a forensic medical examination

Rabiya Majeed-Ariss, Tammi Walker, P. Lee, Dr Catherine White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study explores the experiences of people who have attended Saint Mary's Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC) for a forensic medical examination (FME). Within the United Kingdom, SARCs support complainants following a sexual assault, delivering specialised care and gathering medico-legal evidence for court proceedings. To date, there has been limited research evaluating SARCs responses towards complainants. 863 Feedback and Evaluation forms, from a three-year period, completed by clients who had accessed Saint Mary's SARC's forensic medical examination service were evaluated. Descriptive statistical analysis found a large majority of clients were ‘very satisfied’ with the crisis worker, forensic physician and police. Content analysis of the free text responses found more nuanced experiences, which impacted clients overall experience within the SARC. These comments were split into two themes, ‘Compliments’ and ‘Suggestions for improvement’. There were 404 comments focusing on compliments of the service and the staff. Compliments included messages of thanks, with praise for professionalism of the staff and importance of the service. Clients noted in particular that the FME service was delivered in challenging circumstances i.e. the immediate aftermath of a sexual assault. There were 34 comments which made suggestions for improvements. These suggestions focused on pragmatic and logistic issues.
LanguageEnglish
Pages33-37
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume66
Early online date5 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

medical examination
assault
Referral and Consultation
Police
experience
staff
Physicians
Research
statistical analysis
content analysis
pragmatics
police
logistics
physician
worker
evaluation
evidence
United Kingdom
Professionalism

Cite this

@article{8d8dac010a1b4deda65ef77ac512a1a4,
title = "The experiences of sexually assaulted people attending Saint Mary's Sexual Assault Referral Centre for a forensic medical examination",
abstract = "This study explores the experiences of people who have attended Saint Mary's Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC) for a forensic medical examination (FME). Within the United Kingdom, SARCs support complainants following a sexual assault, delivering specialised care and gathering medico-legal evidence for court proceedings. To date, there has been limited research evaluating SARCs responses towards complainants. 863 Feedback and Evaluation forms, from a three-year period, completed by clients who had accessed Saint Mary's SARC's forensic medical examination service were evaluated. Descriptive statistical analysis found a large majority of clients were ‘very satisfied’ with the crisis worker, forensic physician and police. Content analysis of the free text responses found more nuanced experiences, which impacted clients overall experience within the SARC. These comments were split into two themes, ‘Compliments’ and ‘Suggestions for improvement’. There were 404 comments focusing on compliments of the service and the staff. Compliments included messages of thanks, with praise for professionalism of the staff and importance of the service. Clients noted in particular that the FME service was delivered in challenging circumstances i.e. the immediate aftermath of a sexual assault. There were 34 comments which made suggestions for improvements. These suggestions focused on pragmatic and logistic issues.",
author = "{Rabiya Majeed-Ariss} and Tammi Walker and P. Lee and {Dr Catherine White}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jflm.2019.06.001",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "33--37",
journal = "Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine",
issn = "1752-928X",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

The experiences of sexually assaulted people attending Saint Mary's Sexual Assault Referral Centre for a forensic medical examination. / Rabiya Majeed-Ariss; Walker, Tammi; Lee, P.; Dr Catherine White.

In: Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Vol. 66, 01.08.2019, p. 33-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The experiences of sexually assaulted people attending Saint Mary's Sexual Assault Referral Centre for a forensic medical examination

AU - Rabiya Majeed-Ariss

AU - Walker, Tammi

AU - Lee, P.

AU - Dr Catherine White

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - This study explores the experiences of people who have attended Saint Mary's Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC) for a forensic medical examination (FME). Within the United Kingdom, SARCs support complainants following a sexual assault, delivering specialised care and gathering medico-legal evidence for court proceedings. To date, there has been limited research evaluating SARCs responses towards complainants. 863 Feedback and Evaluation forms, from a three-year period, completed by clients who had accessed Saint Mary's SARC's forensic medical examination service were evaluated. Descriptive statistical analysis found a large majority of clients were ‘very satisfied’ with the crisis worker, forensic physician and police. Content analysis of the free text responses found more nuanced experiences, which impacted clients overall experience within the SARC. These comments were split into two themes, ‘Compliments’ and ‘Suggestions for improvement’. There were 404 comments focusing on compliments of the service and the staff. Compliments included messages of thanks, with praise for professionalism of the staff and importance of the service. Clients noted in particular that the FME service was delivered in challenging circumstances i.e. the immediate aftermath of a sexual assault. There were 34 comments which made suggestions for improvements. These suggestions focused on pragmatic and logistic issues.

AB - This study explores the experiences of people who have attended Saint Mary's Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC) for a forensic medical examination (FME). Within the United Kingdom, SARCs support complainants following a sexual assault, delivering specialised care and gathering medico-legal evidence for court proceedings. To date, there has been limited research evaluating SARCs responses towards complainants. 863 Feedback and Evaluation forms, from a three-year period, completed by clients who had accessed Saint Mary's SARC's forensic medical examination service were evaluated. Descriptive statistical analysis found a large majority of clients were ‘very satisfied’ with the crisis worker, forensic physician and police. Content analysis of the free text responses found more nuanced experiences, which impacted clients overall experience within the SARC. These comments were split into two themes, ‘Compliments’ and ‘Suggestions for improvement’. There were 404 comments focusing on compliments of the service and the staff. Compliments included messages of thanks, with praise for professionalism of the staff and importance of the service. Clients noted in particular that the FME service was delivered in challenging circumstances i.e. the immediate aftermath of a sexual assault. There were 34 comments which made suggestions for improvements. These suggestions focused on pragmatic and logistic issues.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.06.001

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 33

EP - 37

JO - Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine

T2 - Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine

JF - Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine

SN - 1752-928X

ER -