The factor structure and composite reliability of the Profile of Emotional Distress

Philip Hyland, Mark Shevlin, Gary Adamson, Daniel Boduszek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study provides the first assessment of the latent structure of the Profile of Emotional Distress (PED). The PED is a self-report measure of emotional distress (ED) associated strongly with its links to Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT). To date, the PED has been weakly conceptualized using both unitary and binary models of ED. In this study, the dimensionality of the PED was examined within an alternative models’ framework using confirmatory factor analysis and bifactor modelling techniques. A total of 313 law enforcement, military, and related emergency-service personnel completed the PED. Results indicated that a bifactor model conceptualization was the best fit of the data. The bifactor model included a single general factor (ED) and four grouping factors (Concern, Anxiety, Sadness, Depression). Model parameter estimates indicated that the ED factor accounts for the majority of covariance among the observable indicators. Low factor loadings were observed on each of the grouping factors, thus subscale construction is not recommended. Composite reliability results demonstrated that the ED factor possesses excellent internal reliability. The PED was found to be a reliable and valid measure of emotional distress.
LanguageEnglish
Article numbere15
JournalThe Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Law Enforcement
Behavior Therapy
Reproducibility of Results
Self Report
Statistical Factor Analysis
Emergencies
Anxiety
Depression

Cite this

@article{53863641505b432eba033c3bce21a9b7,
title = "The factor structure and composite reliability of the Profile of Emotional Distress",
abstract = "This study provides the first assessment of the latent structure of the Profile of Emotional Distress (PED). The PED is a self-report measure of emotional distress (ED) associated strongly with its links to Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT). To date, the PED has been weakly conceptualized using both unitary and binary models of ED. In this study, the dimensionality of the PED was examined within an alternative models’ framework using confirmatory factor analysis and bifactor modelling techniques. A total of 313 law enforcement, military, and related emergency-service personnel completed the PED. Results indicated that a bifactor model conceptualization was the best fit of the data. The bifactor model included a single general factor (ED) and four grouping factors (Concern, Anxiety, Sadness, Depression). Model parameter estimates indicated that the ED factor accounts for the majority of covariance among the observable indicators. Low factor loadings were observed on each of the grouping factors, thus subscale construction is not recommended. Composite reliability results demonstrated that the ED factor possesses excellent internal reliability. The PED was found to be a reliable and valid measure of emotional distress.",
keywords = "bifactor model, binary model of emotions, confirmatory factor analysis, Profile of Emotional Distress (PED), REBT",
author = "Philip Hyland and Mark Shevlin and Gary Adamson and Daniel Boduszek",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1017/S1754470X13000214",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Cognitive Behaviour Therapist",
issn = "1754-470X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

The factor structure and composite reliability of the Profile of Emotional Distress. / Hyland, Philip; Shevlin, Mark; Adamson, Gary; Boduszek, Daniel.

In: The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, Vol. 6, e15, 27.11.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The factor structure and composite reliability of the Profile of Emotional Distress

AU - Hyland, Philip

AU - Shevlin, Mark

AU - Adamson, Gary

AU - Boduszek, Daniel

PY - 2013/11/27

Y1 - 2013/11/27

N2 - This study provides the first assessment of the latent structure of the Profile of Emotional Distress (PED). The PED is a self-report measure of emotional distress (ED) associated strongly with its links to Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT). To date, the PED has been weakly conceptualized using both unitary and binary models of ED. In this study, the dimensionality of the PED was examined within an alternative models’ framework using confirmatory factor analysis and bifactor modelling techniques. A total of 313 law enforcement, military, and related emergency-service personnel completed the PED. Results indicated that a bifactor model conceptualization was the best fit of the data. The bifactor model included a single general factor (ED) and four grouping factors (Concern, Anxiety, Sadness, Depression). Model parameter estimates indicated that the ED factor accounts for the majority of covariance among the observable indicators. Low factor loadings were observed on each of the grouping factors, thus subscale construction is not recommended. Composite reliability results demonstrated that the ED factor possesses excellent internal reliability. The PED was found to be a reliable and valid measure of emotional distress.

AB - This study provides the first assessment of the latent structure of the Profile of Emotional Distress (PED). The PED is a self-report measure of emotional distress (ED) associated strongly with its links to Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT). To date, the PED has been weakly conceptualized using both unitary and binary models of ED. In this study, the dimensionality of the PED was examined within an alternative models’ framework using confirmatory factor analysis and bifactor modelling techniques. A total of 313 law enforcement, military, and related emergency-service personnel completed the PED. Results indicated that a bifactor model conceptualization was the best fit of the data. The bifactor model included a single general factor (ED) and four grouping factors (Concern, Anxiety, Sadness, Depression). Model parameter estimates indicated that the ED factor accounts for the majority of covariance among the observable indicators. Low factor loadings were observed on each of the grouping factors, thus subscale construction is not recommended. Composite reliability results demonstrated that the ED factor possesses excellent internal reliability. The PED was found to be a reliable and valid measure of emotional distress.

KW - bifactor model

KW - binary model of emotions

KW - confirmatory factor analysis

KW - Profile of Emotional Distress (PED)

KW - REBT

U2 - 10.1017/S1754470X13000214

DO - 10.1017/S1754470X13000214

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Cognitive Behaviour Therapist

T2 - Cognitive Behaviour Therapist

JF - Cognitive Behaviour Therapist

SN - 1754-470X

M1 - e15

ER -