The Feminist Potential of Sociological Institutionalism

Fiona Mackay, Surya Monro, Georgina Waylen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On the face of it, there is considerable potential for productive dialogue between sociological institutionalism (SI) and institutionally oriented feminist political science (FPS). Both approaches employ broad conceptions of the political and its interconnection with the social: Each is concerned with the interaction between actors and institutions, broadly defined; the interplay between formal rules and informal practices, norms, and “ways of doing things”; and the consequent effects of these dynamics. Each approach takes a “value-critical” stance, sharing an understanding that seemingly neutral institutional processes and practices are, in fact, embedded in norms and cognitive frames, and in wider cultural contexts. In this short essay, we argue that SI provides one fruitful source for tools and paradigms beyond conventional political science (Lovenduski 1998; Mackay 2004), tools that may potentially enhance feminist analyses of key questions such as the following: How are institutions and institutional processes gendered? By what processes and mechanisms are institutions (re)produced and, in turn, reflect and reproduce social systems, including gender relations? How do institutions constrain actors and interests? And what is the gendered potential for, and what are the limits of, institutional innovation, reform, and change in pursuit of gender justice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-262
Number of pages10
JournalPolitics and Gender
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

institutionalism
political science
gender relations
interconnection
social system
Innovation
justice
dialogue
paradigm
innovation
reform
gender
interaction
Values

Cite this

Mackay, Fiona ; Monro, Surya ; Waylen, Georgina. / The Feminist Potential of Sociological Institutionalism. In: Politics and Gender. 2009 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 253-262.
@article{a76ff31a83794a37a555e31f634b581a,
title = "The Feminist Potential of Sociological Institutionalism",
abstract = "On the face of it, there is considerable potential for productive dialogue between sociological institutionalism (SI) and institutionally oriented feminist political science (FPS). Both approaches employ broad conceptions of the political and its interconnection with the social: Each is concerned with the interaction between actors and institutions, broadly defined; the interplay between formal rules and informal practices, norms, and “ways of doing things”; and the consequent effects of these dynamics. Each approach takes a “value-critical” stance, sharing an understanding that seemingly neutral institutional processes and practices are, in fact, embedded in norms and cognitive frames, and in wider cultural contexts. In this short essay, we argue that SI provides one fruitful source for tools and paradigms beyond conventional political science (Lovenduski 1998; Mackay 2004), tools that may potentially enhance feminist analyses of key questions such as the following: How are institutions and institutional processes gendered? By what processes and mechanisms are institutions (re)produced and, in turn, reflect and reproduce social systems, including gender relations? How do institutions constrain actors and interests? And what is the gendered potential for, and what are the limits of, institutional innovation, reform, and change in pursuit of gender justice.",
author = "Fiona Mackay and Surya Monro and Georgina Waylen",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1017/S1743923X09000208",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "253--262",
journal = "Politics & Gender",
issn = "1743-923X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

The Feminist Potential of Sociological Institutionalism. / Mackay, Fiona; Monro, Surya; Waylen, Georgina.

In: Politics and Gender, Vol. 5, No. 2, 06.2009, p. 253-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Feminist Potential of Sociological Institutionalism

AU - Mackay, Fiona

AU - Monro, Surya

AU - Waylen, Georgina

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - On the face of it, there is considerable potential for productive dialogue between sociological institutionalism (SI) and institutionally oriented feminist political science (FPS). Both approaches employ broad conceptions of the political and its interconnection with the social: Each is concerned with the interaction between actors and institutions, broadly defined; the interplay between formal rules and informal practices, norms, and “ways of doing things”; and the consequent effects of these dynamics. Each approach takes a “value-critical” stance, sharing an understanding that seemingly neutral institutional processes and practices are, in fact, embedded in norms and cognitive frames, and in wider cultural contexts. In this short essay, we argue that SI provides one fruitful source for tools and paradigms beyond conventional political science (Lovenduski 1998; Mackay 2004), tools that may potentially enhance feminist analyses of key questions such as the following: How are institutions and institutional processes gendered? By what processes and mechanisms are institutions (re)produced and, in turn, reflect and reproduce social systems, including gender relations? How do institutions constrain actors and interests? And what is the gendered potential for, and what are the limits of, institutional innovation, reform, and change in pursuit of gender justice.

AB - On the face of it, there is considerable potential for productive dialogue between sociological institutionalism (SI) and institutionally oriented feminist political science (FPS). Both approaches employ broad conceptions of the political and its interconnection with the social: Each is concerned with the interaction between actors and institutions, broadly defined; the interplay between formal rules and informal practices, norms, and “ways of doing things”; and the consequent effects of these dynamics. Each approach takes a “value-critical” stance, sharing an understanding that seemingly neutral institutional processes and practices are, in fact, embedded in norms and cognitive frames, and in wider cultural contexts. In this short essay, we argue that SI provides one fruitful source for tools and paradigms beyond conventional political science (Lovenduski 1998; Mackay 2004), tools that may potentially enhance feminist analyses of key questions such as the following: How are institutions and institutional processes gendered? By what processes and mechanisms are institutions (re)produced and, in turn, reflect and reproduce social systems, including gender relations? How do institutions constrain actors and interests? And what is the gendered potential for, and what are the limits of, institutional innovation, reform, and change in pursuit of gender justice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950773439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1743923X09000208

DO - 10.1017/S1743923X09000208

M3 - Review article

VL - 5

SP - 253

EP - 262

JO - Politics & Gender

JF - Politics & Gender

SN - 1743-923X

IS - 2

ER -