The Groomers and the Question of Race

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed a number of prominent police‐led operations relating to child sexual exploitation (CSE) in England. Whilst much of the public discourse related to Operation Yewtree, Operation Fernbridge, and others has focused on the criminal nature of CSE, race has been absent from that discourse; conversely, the public debates relating to grooming cases by men of Pakistani heritage have been marked by the presence of race. By critically evaluating the above cases this article aims to put forward three related arguments. First, it aims to highlight and explain contrasting ways in which CSE is debated vis‐á‐vis the category of racialised politics. Second, it demonstrates how racialised discourse of CSE, initially considered to be a
feature of far‐right rhetoric, has taken centre ground. Finally, drawing upon analysis of various reports it aims to question the links between race and CSE to show how racialised discourse of CSE helps undermine its victims.  
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-65
Number of pages12
JournalIdentity papers: A journal of British and Irish studies
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Fingerprint

exploitation
discourse
rhetoric
politics

Cite this

@article{3835f42ad01441068d2d5172f187fb80,
title = "The Groomers and the Question of Race",
abstract = "The last decade has witnessed a number of prominent police‐led operations relating to child sexual exploitation (CSE) in England. Whilst much of the public discourse related to Operation Yewtree, Operation Fernbridge, and others has focused on the criminal nature of CSE, race has been absent from that discourse; conversely, the public debates relating to grooming cases by men of Pakistani heritage have been marked by the presence of race. By critically evaluating the above cases this article aims to put forward three related arguments. First, it aims to highlight and explain contrasting ways in which CSE is debated vis‐{\'a}‐vis the category of racialised politics. Second, it demonstrates how racialised discourse of CSE, initially considered to be afeature of far‐right rhetoric, has taken centre ground. Finally, drawing upon analysis of various reports it aims to question the links between race and CSE to show how racialised discourse of CSE helps undermine its victims.  ",
keywords = "Grooming, Racial politics, Child sexual exploitation, Policy",
author = "Shamim Miah",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.5920/idp.2015.1154",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "54--65",
journal = "Identity papers: A journal of British and Irish studies",
issn = "2058-6205",
publisher = "University of Huddersfield Press",
number = "1",

}

The Groomers and the Question of Race. / Miah, Shamim.

In: Identity papers: A journal of British and Irish studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 04.2015, p. 54-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Groomers and the Question of Race

AU - Miah, Shamim

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - The last decade has witnessed a number of prominent police‐led operations relating to child sexual exploitation (CSE) in England. Whilst much of the public discourse related to Operation Yewtree, Operation Fernbridge, and others has focused on the criminal nature of CSE, race has been absent from that discourse; conversely, the public debates relating to grooming cases by men of Pakistani heritage have been marked by the presence of race. By critically evaluating the above cases this article aims to put forward three related arguments. First, it aims to highlight and explain contrasting ways in which CSE is debated vis‐á‐vis the category of racialised politics. Second, it demonstrates how racialised discourse of CSE, initially considered to be afeature of far‐right rhetoric, has taken centre ground. Finally, drawing upon analysis of various reports it aims to question the links between race and CSE to show how racialised discourse of CSE helps undermine its victims.  

AB - The last decade has witnessed a number of prominent police‐led operations relating to child sexual exploitation (CSE) in England. Whilst much of the public discourse related to Operation Yewtree, Operation Fernbridge, and others has focused on the criminal nature of CSE, race has been absent from that discourse; conversely, the public debates relating to grooming cases by men of Pakistani heritage have been marked by the presence of race. By critically evaluating the above cases this article aims to put forward three related arguments. First, it aims to highlight and explain contrasting ways in which CSE is debated vis‐á‐vis the category of racialised politics. Second, it demonstrates how racialised discourse of CSE, initially considered to be afeature of far‐right rhetoric, has taken centre ground. Finally, drawing upon analysis of various reports it aims to question the links between race and CSE to show how racialised discourse of CSE helps undermine its victims.  

KW - Grooming

KW - Racial politics

KW - Child sexual exploitation

KW - Policy

UR - http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/journal/abis/

U2 - 10.5920/idp.2015.1154

DO - 10.5920/idp.2015.1154

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 54

EP - 65

JO - Identity papers: A journal of British and Irish studies

JF - Identity papers: A journal of British and Irish studies

SN - 2058-6205

IS - 1

ER -