The Importance of Comparison in Clients' Experiences of an Assessment Group for Group Psychotherapy: A Qualitative Study

Rachael Noble, Patricia Hall, Mike Lucock, Colm Crowley, Tony Ashton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Using a grounded theory approach, this study explored the experiences of eight clients who attended a group assessment group (GAG) within a UK adult psychotherapy service. The aim of the GAG was to give clients a one off experience of group therapy to enable them to make a more informed decision about the suitability of analytic group therapy. The qualitative analysis revealed comparison to be a key theme for 7 of the 8 clients. Comparison with others was experienced in terms of similarity and dissimilarity of problems and issues and of the behaviour of the group members. These experiences related to issues such as deserving to be there and stigma and this influenced their decisions to opt for group work. Comparisons were also made between the GAG and subsequent group therapy. The issue of social comparison is discussed with reference to previous theory and research and the implications of the study for group therapy and group assessment groups are explored.
LanguageEnglish
Pages161-176
Number of pages16
JournalMental Health and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

group therapy
experience
Group
group work
psychotherapy
grounded theory
group membership

Cite this

@article{46a54c10578b452b8e47a305548a2771,
title = "The Importance of Comparison in Clients' Experiences of an Assessment Group for Group Psychotherapy: A Qualitative Study",
abstract = "Using a grounded theory approach, this study explored the experiences of eight clients who attended a group assessment group (GAG) within a UK adult psychotherapy service. The aim of the GAG was to give clients a one off experience of group therapy to enable them to make a more informed decision about the suitability of analytic group therapy. The qualitative analysis revealed comparison to be a key theme for 7 of the 8 clients. Comparison with others was experienced in terms of similarity and dissimilarity of problems and issues and of the behaviour of the group members. These experiences related to issues such as deserving to be there and stigma and this influenced their decisions to opt for group work. Comparisons were also made between the GAG and subsequent group therapy. The issue of social comparison is discussed with reference to previous theory and research and the implications of the study for group therapy and group assessment groups are explored.",
author = "Rachael Noble and Patricia Hall and Mike Lucock and Colm Crowley and Tony Ashton",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.5920/mhldrp.2006.32161",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "161--176",
journal = "Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice",
issn = "2054-1546",
publisher = "University of Huddersfield Press",
number = "2",

}

The Importance of Comparison in Clients' Experiences of an Assessment Group for Group Psychotherapy : A Qualitative Study. / Noble, Rachael; Hall, Patricia; Lucock, Mike; Crowley, Colm; Ashton, Tony.

In: Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2006, p. 161-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Importance of Comparison in Clients' Experiences of an Assessment Group for Group Psychotherapy

T2 - Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice

AU - Noble, Rachael

AU - Hall, Patricia

AU - Lucock, Mike

AU - Crowley, Colm

AU - Ashton, Tony

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Using a grounded theory approach, this study explored the experiences of eight clients who attended a group assessment group (GAG) within a UK adult psychotherapy service. The aim of the GAG was to give clients a one off experience of group therapy to enable them to make a more informed decision about the suitability of analytic group therapy. The qualitative analysis revealed comparison to be a key theme for 7 of the 8 clients. Comparison with others was experienced in terms of similarity and dissimilarity of problems and issues and of the behaviour of the group members. These experiences related to issues such as deserving to be there and stigma and this influenced their decisions to opt for group work. Comparisons were also made between the GAG and subsequent group therapy. The issue of social comparison is discussed with reference to previous theory and research and the implications of the study for group therapy and group assessment groups are explored.

AB - Using a grounded theory approach, this study explored the experiences of eight clients who attended a group assessment group (GAG) within a UK adult psychotherapy service. The aim of the GAG was to give clients a one off experience of group therapy to enable them to make a more informed decision about the suitability of analytic group therapy. The qualitative analysis revealed comparison to be a key theme for 7 of the 8 clients. Comparison with others was experienced in terms of similarity and dissimilarity of problems and issues and of the behaviour of the group members. These experiences related to issues such as deserving to be there and stigma and this influenced their decisions to opt for group work. Comparisons were also made between the GAG and subsequent group therapy. The issue of social comparison is discussed with reference to previous theory and research and the implications of the study for group therapy and group assessment groups are explored.

UR - http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/journal/mhldrp/

U2 - 10.5920/mhldrp.2006.32161

DO - 10.5920/mhldrp.2006.32161

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 161

EP - 176

JO - Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice

JF - Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice

SN - 2054-1546

IS - 2

ER -