The institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA) in Jordanian international firms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of the institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA) within publicly traded international firms in Jordan. The aim is to contribute to the development of IPRA theory by identifying indicators of institutionalisation; by describing and explaining their determinants; and by investigating their relative importance. The paper also represents one of the first studies of political risk assessment of firms in a Middle East context. The study focuses on firm-specific characteristics and extends previous research by investigating firms' size and degree of internationalisation. A survey strategy was adopted and self-administered questionnaires were distributed to the entire target population of Jordanian international firms. 44 usable responses were obtained (54.9%). Non-parametric statistics were used to test the research hypotheses. The main findings are that the level of institutionalisation of political risk assessment (PRA) within firms is significantly and positively correlated with a firm's total assets, international revenue and number of operating countries. Of the three significant determinants of institutionalisation, the number of operating countries is found to be the most important. The more countries in which a firm operates, the more likely it is to face significant risks, and so to institutionalise political risk assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)688-702
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Business Review
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Political risk
Institutionalization
Risk assessment
Jordan
Revenue
Firm-specific characteristics
Firm size
Middle East
Assets
Questionnaire
Degree of internationalization
Relative importance
Nonparametric statistics

Cite this

@article{8ca10b7106f84437b6d2aa2d58efb2d3,
title = "The institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA) in Jordanian international firms",
abstract = "This paper investigates the determinants of the institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA) within publicly traded international firms in Jordan. The aim is to contribute to the development of IPRA theory by identifying indicators of institutionalisation; by describing and explaining their determinants; and by investigating their relative importance. The paper also represents one of the first studies of political risk assessment of firms in a Middle East context. The study focuses on firm-specific characteristics and extends previous research by investigating firms' size and degree of internationalisation. A survey strategy was adopted and self-administered questionnaires were distributed to the entire target population of Jordanian international firms. 44 usable responses were obtained (54.9{\%}). Non-parametric statistics were used to test the research hypotheses. The main findings are that the level of institutionalisation of political risk assessment (PRA) within firms is significantly and positively correlated with a firm's total assets, international revenue and number of operating countries. Of the three significant determinants of institutionalisation, the number of operating countries is found to be the most important. The more countries in which a firm operates, the more likely it is to face significant risks, and so to institutionalise political risk assessment.",
keywords = "Assessment, Developing countries, Institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA), Jordan, Political risk",
author = "{Al Khattab}, Adel and Anchor, {John R.} and Davies, {Eleanor M M}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.09.007",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "688--702",
journal = "International Business Review",
issn = "0969-5931",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "6",

}

The institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA) in Jordanian international firms. / Al Khattab, Adel; Anchor, John R.; Davies, Eleanor M M.

In: International Business Review, Vol. 17, No. 6, 01.12.2008, p. 688-702.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA) in Jordanian international firms

AU - Al Khattab, Adel

AU - Anchor, John R.

AU - Davies, Eleanor M M

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - This paper investigates the determinants of the institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA) within publicly traded international firms in Jordan. The aim is to contribute to the development of IPRA theory by identifying indicators of institutionalisation; by describing and explaining their determinants; and by investigating their relative importance. The paper also represents one of the first studies of political risk assessment of firms in a Middle East context. The study focuses on firm-specific characteristics and extends previous research by investigating firms' size and degree of internationalisation. A survey strategy was adopted and self-administered questionnaires were distributed to the entire target population of Jordanian international firms. 44 usable responses were obtained (54.9%). Non-parametric statistics were used to test the research hypotheses. The main findings are that the level of institutionalisation of political risk assessment (PRA) within firms is significantly and positively correlated with a firm's total assets, international revenue and number of operating countries. Of the three significant determinants of institutionalisation, the number of operating countries is found to be the most important. The more countries in which a firm operates, the more likely it is to face significant risks, and so to institutionalise political risk assessment.

AB - This paper investigates the determinants of the institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA) within publicly traded international firms in Jordan. The aim is to contribute to the development of IPRA theory by identifying indicators of institutionalisation; by describing and explaining their determinants; and by investigating their relative importance. The paper also represents one of the first studies of political risk assessment of firms in a Middle East context. The study focuses on firm-specific characteristics and extends previous research by investigating firms' size and degree of internationalisation. A survey strategy was adopted and self-administered questionnaires were distributed to the entire target population of Jordanian international firms. 44 usable responses were obtained (54.9%). Non-parametric statistics were used to test the research hypotheses. The main findings are that the level of institutionalisation of political risk assessment (PRA) within firms is significantly and positively correlated with a firm's total assets, international revenue and number of operating countries. Of the three significant determinants of institutionalisation, the number of operating countries is found to be the most important. The more countries in which a firm operates, the more likely it is to face significant risks, and so to institutionalise political risk assessment.

KW - Assessment

KW - Developing countries

KW - Institutionalisation of political risk assessment (IPRA)

KW - Jordan

KW - Political risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56949099301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.09.007

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 688

EP - 702

JO - International Business Review

JF - International Business Review

SN - 0969-5931

IS - 6

ER -