The Limitations of using "ra" to describe surface roughness

Martin N. Goodhand, Karl Walton, Liam Blunt, Hang W. Lung, Robert J. Miller, Reg Marsden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current criteria used to determine whether rough surfaces affect skin friction typically rely on a single amplitude parameter to characterize the roughness. The most commonly used criteria relate the centerline averaged roughness, Ra, to an equivalent sandgrain roughness size, ks. This paper shows that such criteria are oversimplified and that Ra/ks is dependent on the roughness topography, namely, the roughness slope defined as the roughness amplitude normalized by the distance between roughness peaks, Ra/λ. To demonstrate the relationship, wake traverses were undertaken downstream of an aerofoil with various polished surfaces. The admissible roughness Reynolds number (q1u1Ra/l1) at which the drag rose above the smooth blade case was determined. The results were used to demonstrate a 400% variation in Ra/ks over the roughness topographies tested. The relationship found held for all cases tested, except those where the roughness first initiated premature transition at the leading edge. In these cases, where the roughness was more typical of eroded aerofoils, the drag was found to rise earlier.

LanguageEnglish
Article number101003
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Turbomachinery
Volume138
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Surface roughness
Airfoils
Topography
Drag
Skin friction
Reynolds number

Cite this

Goodhand, Martin N. ; Walton, Karl ; Blunt, Liam ; Lung, Hang W. ; Miller, Robert J. ; Marsden, Reg. / The Limitations of using "ra" to describe surface roughness. In: Journal of Turbomachinery. 2016 ; Vol. 138, No. 10.
@article{b2623fdcaf4549a7a33fae9f0ca191b1,
title = "The Limitations of using {"}ra{"} to describe surface roughness",
abstract = "Current criteria used to determine whether rough surfaces affect skin friction typically rely on a single amplitude parameter to characterize the roughness. The most commonly used criteria relate the centerline averaged roughness, Ra, to an equivalent sandgrain roughness size, ks. This paper shows that such criteria are oversimplified and that Ra/ks is dependent on the roughness topography, namely, the roughness slope defined as the roughness amplitude normalized by the distance between roughness peaks, Ra/λ. To demonstrate the relationship, wake traverses were undertaken downstream of an aerofoil with various polished surfaces. The admissible roughness Reynolds number (q1u1Ra/l1) at which the drag rose above the smooth blade case was determined. The results were used to demonstrate a 400{\%} variation in Ra/ks over the roughness topographies tested. The relationship found held for all cases tested, except those where the roughness first initiated premature transition at the leading edge. In these cases, where the roughness was more typical of eroded aerofoils, the drag was found to rise earlier.",
author = "Goodhand, {Martin N.} and Karl Walton and Liam Blunt and Lung, {Hang W.} and Miller, {Robert J.} and Reg Marsden",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1115/1.4032280",
language = "English",
volume = "138",
journal = "Journal of Turbomachinery",
issn = "0889-504X",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)",
number = "10",

}

The Limitations of using "ra" to describe surface roughness. / Goodhand, Martin N.; Walton, Karl; Blunt, Liam; Lung, Hang W.; Miller, Robert J.; Marsden, Reg.

In: Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 138, No. 10, 101003, 26.04.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Limitations of using "ra" to describe surface roughness

AU - Goodhand, Martin N.

AU - Walton, Karl

AU - Blunt, Liam

AU - Lung, Hang W.

AU - Miller, Robert J.

AU - Marsden, Reg

PY - 2016/4/26

Y1 - 2016/4/26

N2 - Current criteria used to determine whether rough surfaces affect skin friction typically rely on a single amplitude parameter to characterize the roughness. The most commonly used criteria relate the centerline averaged roughness, Ra, to an equivalent sandgrain roughness size, ks. This paper shows that such criteria are oversimplified and that Ra/ks is dependent on the roughness topography, namely, the roughness slope defined as the roughness amplitude normalized by the distance between roughness peaks, Ra/λ. To demonstrate the relationship, wake traverses were undertaken downstream of an aerofoil with various polished surfaces. The admissible roughness Reynolds number (q1u1Ra/l1) at which the drag rose above the smooth blade case was determined. The results were used to demonstrate a 400% variation in Ra/ks over the roughness topographies tested. The relationship found held for all cases tested, except those where the roughness first initiated premature transition at the leading edge. In these cases, where the roughness was more typical of eroded aerofoils, the drag was found to rise earlier.

AB - Current criteria used to determine whether rough surfaces affect skin friction typically rely on a single amplitude parameter to characterize the roughness. The most commonly used criteria relate the centerline averaged roughness, Ra, to an equivalent sandgrain roughness size, ks. This paper shows that such criteria are oversimplified and that Ra/ks is dependent on the roughness topography, namely, the roughness slope defined as the roughness amplitude normalized by the distance between roughness peaks, Ra/λ. To demonstrate the relationship, wake traverses were undertaken downstream of an aerofoil with various polished surfaces. The admissible roughness Reynolds number (q1u1Ra/l1) at which the drag rose above the smooth blade case was determined. The results were used to demonstrate a 400% variation in Ra/ks over the roughness topographies tested. The relationship found held for all cases tested, except those where the roughness first initiated premature transition at the leading edge. In these cases, where the roughness was more typical of eroded aerofoils, the drag was found to rise earlier.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973514526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.4032280

DO - 10.1115/1.4032280

M3 - Article

VL - 138

JO - Journal of Turbomachinery

T2 - Journal of Turbomachinery

JF - Journal of Turbomachinery

SN - 0889-504X

IS - 10

M1 - 101003

ER -