The Missing Link in Training to Detect Deception and its Implications for Justice

Saskia Ryan, Nicole Sherretts, Dominic Willmott, Dara Mojtahedi, Benjamin Baughman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of response bias and target gender on detecting deception. Design/methodology/approach: Participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions: a stereotype condition (bogus training group), a tell-signs condition (empirically tested cues), and a control condition. Participants were required to decide whether eight targets were lying or telling the truth, based upon the information they had been given. Accuracy was measured via a correct or incorrect response to the stimuli. The data were then analyzed using a 2× 2 × 3 mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether any main or interactional effects were present. Findings: Results revealed training condition had no significant effect on accuracy, nor was there a within-subject effect of gender. However, there was a significant main effect of accuracy in detecting truth or lies, and a significant interaction between target gender and detecting truth or lies. Research limitations/implications: Future research should seek a larger sample of participants with a more extensive training aspect developed into the study, as the brief training offered here may not be fully reflective of the extent and intensity of training which could be offered to professionals. Originality/value: Within the criminal justice system, the need for increased accuracy in detecting deception is of critical importance; not only to detect whether a guilty individual is being deceitful, but also whether someone is making a false confession, both to improve community safety by detaining the correct perpetrator for the crime but also to maintain public trust in the justice system. The present research provides a fresh insight into the importance of training effects in detecting deception.

LanguageEnglish
Pages33-46
Number of pages14
JournalSafer Communities
Volume17
Issue number1
Early online date1 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Deception
justice
Crime
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Sexism
Criminal Law
Research
Cues
gender
Analysis of Variance
Safety
analysis of variance
stereotype
stimulus
offense
methodology
trend
interaction
community

Cite this

Ryan, Saskia ; Sherretts, Nicole ; Willmott, Dominic ; Mojtahedi, Dara ; Baughman, Benjamin. / The Missing Link in Training to Detect Deception and its Implications for Justice. In: Safer Communities. 2018 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 33-46.
@article{70d663c8fe7f4ca59f02425affb4c9cc,
title = "The Missing Link in Training to Detect Deception and its Implications for Justice",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of response bias and target gender on detecting deception. Design/methodology/approach: Participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions: a stereotype condition (bogus training group), a tell-signs condition (empirically tested cues), and a control condition. Participants were required to decide whether eight targets were lying or telling the truth, based upon the information they had been given. Accuracy was measured via a correct or incorrect response to the stimuli. The data were then analyzed using a 2× 2 × 3 mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether any main or interactional effects were present. Findings: Results revealed training condition had no significant effect on accuracy, nor was there a within-subject effect of gender. However, there was a significant main effect of accuracy in detecting truth or lies, and a significant interaction between target gender and detecting truth or lies. Research limitations/implications: Future research should seek a larger sample of participants with a more extensive training aspect developed into the study, as the brief training offered here may not be fully reflective of the extent and intensity of training which could be offered to professionals. Originality/value: Within the criminal justice system, the need for increased accuracy in detecting deception is of critical importance; not only to detect whether a guilty individual is being deceitful, but also whether someone is making a false confession, both to improve community safety by detaining the correct perpetrator for the crime but also to maintain public trust in the justice system. The present research provides a fresh insight into the importance of training effects in detecting deception.",
keywords = "Detecting deception, Police training, Individual differences, Nonverbal behavior, Jury, Non-verbal behaviour, Deception, Interviewing",
author = "Saskia Ryan and Nicole Sherretts and Dominic Willmott and Dara Mojtahedi and Benjamin Baughman",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/SC-07-2017-0027",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "33--46",
journal = "Safer Communities",
issn = "1757-8043",
publisher = "Pier Professional Ltd",
number = "1",

}

The Missing Link in Training to Detect Deception and its Implications for Justice. / Ryan, Saskia; Sherretts, Nicole; Willmott, Dominic; Mojtahedi, Dara; Baughman, Benjamin.

In: Safer Communities, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 33-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Missing Link in Training to Detect Deception and its Implications for Justice

AU - Ryan, Saskia

AU - Sherretts, Nicole

AU - Willmott, Dominic

AU - Mojtahedi, Dara

AU - Baughman, Benjamin

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of response bias and target gender on detecting deception. Design/methodology/approach: Participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions: a stereotype condition (bogus training group), a tell-signs condition (empirically tested cues), and a control condition. Participants were required to decide whether eight targets were lying or telling the truth, based upon the information they had been given. Accuracy was measured via a correct or incorrect response to the stimuli. The data were then analyzed using a 2× 2 × 3 mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether any main or interactional effects were present. Findings: Results revealed training condition had no significant effect on accuracy, nor was there a within-subject effect of gender. However, there was a significant main effect of accuracy in detecting truth or lies, and a significant interaction between target gender and detecting truth or lies. Research limitations/implications: Future research should seek a larger sample of participants with a more extensive training aspect developed into the study, as the brief training offered here may not be fully reflective of the extent and intensity of training which could be offered to professionals. Originality/value: Within the criminal justice system, the need for increased accuracy in detecting deception is of critical importance; not only to detect whether a guilty individual is being deceitful, but also whether someone is making a false confession, both to improve community safety by detaining the correct perpetrator for the crime but also to maintain public trust in the justice system. The present research provides a fresh insight into the importance of training effects in detecting deception.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of response bias and target gender on detecting deception. Design/methodology/approach: Participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions: a stereotype condition (bogus training group), a tell-signs condition (empirically tested cues), and a control condition. Participants were required to decide whether eight targets were lying or telling the truth, based upon the information they had been given. Accuracy was measured via a correct or incorrect response to the stimuli. The data were then analyzed using a 2× 2 × 3 mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether any main or interactional effects were present. Findings: Results revealed training condition had no significant effect on accuracy, nor was there a within-subject effect of gender. However, there was a significant main effect of accuracy in detecting truth or lies, and a significant interaction between target gender and detecting truth or lies. Research limitations/implications: Future research should seek a larger sample of participants with a more extensive training aspect developed into the study, as the brief training offered here may not be fully reflective of the extent and intensity of training which could be offered to professionals. Originality/value: Within the criminal justice system, the need for increased accuracy in detecting deception is of critical importance; not only to detect whether a guilty individual is being deceitful, but also whether someone is making a false confession, both to improve community safety by detaining the correct perpetrator for the crime but also to maintain public trust in the justice system. The present research provides a fresh insight into the importance of training effects in detecting deception.

KW - Detecting deception

KW - Police training

KW - Individual differences

KW - Nonverbal behavior

KW - Jury

KW - Non-verbal behaviour

KW - Deception

KW - Interviewing

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/sc

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038243549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/SC-07-2017-0027

DO - 10.1108/SC-07-2017-0027

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 33

EP - 46

JO - Safer Communities

T2 - Safer Communities

JF - Safer Communities

SN - 1757-8043

IS - 1

ER -