Abstract
Attempts to apply conventional rule-based expert systems to legal problem-solving raise seemingly insurmountable obstacles. The authors analyse the key challenges of developing a legal expert system by reference to a case study of issues arising in their prototype system, the JAES project. This paper explores the advantages of exploiting three alternative approaches- namely: case-based reasoning, blackboard architecture, and service-oriented architecture for the next generation of legal expert systems. The authors advocate the use of hybrid architecture to address the complexity and dynamic nature of the legal domain. The paper evaluates the extent to which these enhancements can meet the special complexities of the legal domain.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVII |
Subtitle of host publication | Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XVIII Proceedings of AI-2010, The Thirtieth SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence |
Editors | Max Bramer, Miltos Petridis, Adrian Hopgood |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Pages | 439-452 |
Number of pages | 14 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780857291301 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780857291295 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 30th SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence - Cambridge, United Kingdom Duration: 14 Dec 2010 → 16 Dec 2010 Conference number: 30 |
Conference
Conference | 30th SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | AI 2010 |
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Cambridge |
Period | 14/12/10 → 16/12/10 |