The perioperative Team Brief: A patient safety initiative or another tick-box exercise?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist has been the subject of many professional discussions following its introduction in 2008. Since the addition of the Team Brief and Debrief in 2010 and the acceptance of the Five Steps to Safer Surgery as the gold standard, compliance has steadily improved (as audited by Care Quality Commission Inspections). This review of the literature therefore examined the perioperative Team Brief and identified gaps in knowledge. Evidence appears to suggest that whilst compliance is good in quantitative terms, there may be inconsistencies within the quality of Team Briefs from organisation to organisation and surgeon to surgeon. Concluding further research is required to establish what an effective Team Brief looks, sounds and feels like to all involved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)408-412
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of perioperative practice
Volume29
Issue number12
Early online date28 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Ticks
Patient Safety
Compliance
Organizations
Exercise
Quality of Health Care
Checklist
Safety
Research
Surgeons

Cite this

@article{b69ddc55671d46aa8a66a5556c130254,
title = "The perioperative Team Brief: A patient safety initiative or another tick-box exercise?",
abstract = "The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist has been the subject of many professional discussions following its introduction in 2008. Since the addition of the Team Brief and Debrief in 2010 and the acceptance of the Five Steps to Safer Surgery as the gold standard, compliance has steadily improved (as audited by Care Quality Commission Inspections). This review of the literature therefore examined the perioperative Team Brief and identified gaps in knowledge. Evidence appears to suggest that whilst compliance is good in quantitative terms, there may be inconsistencies within the quality of Team Briefs from organisation to organisation and surgeon to surgeon. Concluding further research is required to establish what an effective Team Brief looks, sounds and feels like to all involved.",
keywords = "Non-technical skills, Perioperative, Safe Surgery, Team Brief, WHO checklist",
author = "Bernard Pennington and Joanne Garside",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1750458919845828",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "408--412",
journal = "Journal of perioperative practice",
issn = "1750-4589",
publisher = "Association for Perioperative Practice",
number = "12",

}

The perioperative Team Brief : A patient safety initiative or another tick-box exercise? / Pennington, Bernard; Garside, Joanne.

In: Journal of perioperative practice, Vol. 29, No. 12, 01.12.2019, p. 408-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The perioperative Team Brief

T2 - A patient safety initiative or another tick-box exercise?

AU - Pennington, Bernard

AU - Garside, Joanne

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist has been the subject of many professional discussions following its introduction in 2008. Since the addition of the Team Brief and Debrief in 2010 and the acceptance of the Five Steps to Safer Surgery as the gold standard, compliance has steadily improved (as audited by Care Quality Commission Inspections). This review of the literature therefore examined the perioperative Team Brief and identified gaps in knowledge. Evidence appears to suggest that whilst compliance is good in quantitative terms, there may be inconsistencies within the quality of Team Briefs from organisation to organisation and surgeon to surgeon. Concluding further research is required to establish what an effective Team Brief looks, sounds and feels like to all involved.

AB - The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist has been the subject of many professional discussions following its introduction in 2008. Since the addition of the Team Brief and Debrief in 2010 and the acceptance of the Five Steps to Safer Surgery as the gold standard, compliance has steadily improved (as audited by Care Quality Commission Inspections). This review of the literature therefore examined the perioperative Team Brief and identified gaps in knowledge. Evidence appears to suggest that whilst compliance is good in quantitative terms, there may be inconsistencies within the quality of Team Briefs from organisation to organisation and surgeon to surgeon. Concluding further research is required to establish what an effective Team Brief looks, sounds and feels like to all involved.

KW - Non-technical skills

KW - Perioperative

KW - Safe Surgery

KW - Team Brief

KW - WHO checklist

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066868228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1750458919845828

DO - 10.1177/1750458919845828

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85066868228

VL - 29

SP - 408

EP - 412

JO - Journal of perioperative practice

JF - Journal of perioperative practice

SN - 1750-4589

IS - 12

ER -