The political potential of numbers

data visualisation in the abortion debate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Data visualisation has been argued to have the power to ‘change the world’, implicitly for the better, but when it comes to abortion, both sides make moral claims to ‘good’. Visualisation conventions of clean lines and shapes simplify data, lending them a rhetoric of neutrality, as if the data is the whole story. It is imperative, therefore, to examine how data visualisations are used to shape women’s lives. This article draws on the findings of the Persuasive Data project . Google Image Scraper was used to locate abortion-related visualisations circulating online. The images, their web locations, and data use were social semiotically analysed to understand their visual rhetoric and political use. Anti-abortion groups are more likely to use data visualisation than pro-choice groups, thereby simplifying the issue and mobilising the rhetoric of neutrality. I argue that data visualisations are being used as a hindrance to women’s access to abortion, and that the critique of such visualisations needs to come from feminists. This article extends discussions of how data is often reified as objective, by showing how the rhetoric of objectivity within data visualisation conventions is harnessed to do work in the world that is potentially very damaging to women’s rights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-96
Number of pages14
JournalWomen, Gender & Research
Volume26
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sep 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

abortion
visualization
rhetoric
neutrality
women's rights
objectivity
lending
search engine
Group

Cite this

@article{12ab4574c187401b944414b9bdb81482,
title = "The political potential of numbers: data visualisation in the abortion debate",
abstract = "Data visualisation has been argued to have the power to ‘change the world’, implicitly for the better, but when it comes to abortion, both sides make moral claims to ‘good’. Visualisation conventions of clean lines and shapes simplify data, lending them a rhetoric of neutrality, as if the data is the whole story. It is imperative, therefore, to examine how data visualisations are used to shape women’s lives. This article draws on the findings of the Persuasive Data project . Google Image Scraper was used to locate abortion-related visualisations circulating online. The images, their web locations, and data use were social semiotically analysed to understand their visual rhetoric and political use. Anti-abortion groups are more likely to use data visualisation than pro-choice groups, thereby simplifying the issue and mobilising the rhetoric of neutrality. I argue that data visualisations are being used as a hindrance to women’s access to abortion, and that the critique of such visualisations needs to come from feminists. This article extends discussions of how data is often reified as objective, by showing how the rhetoric of objectivity within data visualisation conventions is harnessed to do work in the world that is potentially very damaging to women’s rights.",
keywords = "abortion, data activism, data visualisation, feminism, pro-choice",
author = "Hill, {Rosemary Lucy}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "83--96",
journal = "Women, Gender & Research",
issn = "0907-6182",
publisher = "K{\o}benhavns Universitet, Sociologisk Institut, Koordinationen for K{\o}nsforskning",
number = "1",

}

The political potential of numbers : data visualisation in the abortion debate. / Hill, Rosemary Lucy.

In: Women, Gender & Research , Vol. 26, No. 1, 05.09.2017, p. 83-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The political potential of numbers

T2 - data visualisation in the abortion debate

AU - Hill, Rosemary Lucy

PY - 2017/9/5

Y1 - 2017/9/5

N2 - Data visualisation has been argued to have the power to ‘change the world’, implicitly for the better, but when it comes to abortion, both sides make moral claims to ‘good’. Visualisation conventions of clean lines and shapes simplify data, lending them a rhetoric of neutrality, as if the data is the whole story. It is imperative, therefore, to examine how data visualisations are used to shape women’s lives. This article draws on the findings of the Persuasive Data project . Google Image Scraper was used to locate abortion-related visualisations circulating online. The images, their web locations, and data use were social semiotically analysed to understand their visual rhetoric and political use. Anti-abortion groups are more likely to use data visualisation than pro-choice groups, thereby simplifying the issue and mobilising the rhetoric of neutrality. I argue that data visualisations are being used as a hindrance to women’s access to abortion, and that the critique of such visualisations needs to come from feminists. This article extends discussions of how data is often reified as objective, by showing how the rhetoric of objectivity within data visualisation conventions is harnessed to do work in the world that is potentially very damaging to women’s rights.

AB - Data visualisation has been argued to have the power to ‘change the world’, implicitly for the better, but when it comes to abortion, both sides make moral claims to ‘good’. Visualisation conventions of clean lines and shapes simplify data, lending them a rhetoric of neutrality, as if the data is the whole story. It is imperative, therefore, to examine how data visualisations are used to shape women’s lives. This article draws on the findings of the Persuasive Data project . Google Image Scraper was used to locate abortion-related visualisations circulating online. The images, their web locations, and data use were social semiotically analysed to understand their visual rhetoric and political use. Anti-abortion groups are more likely to use data visualisation than pro-choice groups, thereby simplifying the issue and mobilising the rhetoric of neutrality. I argue that data visualisations are being used as a hindrance to women’s access to abortion, and that the critique of such visualisations needs to come from feminists. This article extends discussions of how data is often reified as objective, by showing how the rhetoric of objectivity within data visualisation conventions is harnessed to do work in the world that is potentially very damaging to women’s rights.

KW - abortion

KW - data activism

KW - data visualisation

KW - feminism

KW - pro-choice

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 83

EP - 96

JO - Women, Gender & Research

JF - Women, Gender & Research

SN - 0907-6182

IS - 1

ER -