The Prioress and the Second Nun

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Although there has been a mass of work on the Prioress and the nature of her femininity, scholars have paid little attention to the relationship between her gender and her position of authority as the head of a religious house Taking account of the Prioress’s position as an office-holder in an analysis of her representation suggests that Chaucer’s depiction of her was rather less ambiguously indulgent and more deliberately disparaging than has often been allowed. Although the Second Nun, who accompanies the Prioress, is not described in detail in the ‘General Prologue’, her tale does reveal something of her character and piety. Together the Prioress and the Second Nun suggest something of the negotiations between anti-feminist theory and the actualities of everyday life which women had to make in order to wield authority.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHistorians on Chaucer
Subtitle of host publicationThe 'General Prologue' to the Canterbury Tales
EditorsStephen H. Rigby
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages94-113
Number of pages20
ISBN (Print)9780199689545
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Authority
Nuns
Actuality
Prolog
Everyday Life
Religious Houses
Piety
Femininity
Feminist Theory

Cite this

Lewis, K. (2014). The Prioress and the Second Nun. In S. H. Rigby (Ed.), Historians on Chaucer: The 'General Prologue' to the Canterbury Tales (pp. 94-113). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689545.001.0001, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689545.003.0006
Lewis, Katherine. / The Prioress and the Second Nun. Historians on Chaucer: The 'General Prologue' to the Canterbury Tales. editor / Stephen H. Rigby. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2014. pp. 94-113
@inbook{8b94930d4663446bb50e6b8e634312b7,
title = "The Prioress and the Second Nun",
abstract = "Although there has been a mass of work on the Prioress and the nature of her femininity, scholars have paid little attention to the relationship between her gender and her position of authority as the head of a religious house Taking account of the Prioress’s position as an office-holder in an analysis of her representation suggests that Chaucer’s depiction of her was rather less ambiguously indulgent and more deliberately disparaging than has often been allowed. Although the Second Nun, who accompanies the Prioress, is not described in detail in the ‘General Prologue’, her tale does reveal something of her character and piety. Together the Prioress and the Second Nun suggest something of the negotiations between anti-feminist theory and the actualities of everyday life which women had to make in order to wield authority.",
keywords = "Chaucer's Prioress, Second Nun, female authority, nunneries, female saints, General Prologue",
author = "Katherine Lewis",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689545.001.0001",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780199689545",
pages = "94--113",
editor = "Rigby, {Stephen H.}",
booktitle = "Historians on Chaucer",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Lewis, K 2014, The Prioress and the Second Nun. in SH Rigby (ed.), Historians on Chaucer: The 'General Prologue' to the Canterbury Tales. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 94-113. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689545.001.0001, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689545.003.0006

The Prioress and the Second Nun. / Lewis, Katherine.

Historians on Chaucer: The 'General Prologue' to the Canterbury Tales. ed. / Stephen H. Rigby. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 94-113.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Prioress and the Second Nun

AU - Lewis, Katherine

PY - 2014/12/4

Y1 - 2014/12/4

N2 - Although there has been a mass of work on the Prioress and the nature of her femininity, scholars have paid little attention to the relationship between her gender and her position of authority as the head of a religious house Taking account of the Prioress’s position as an office-holder in an analysis of her representation suggests that Chaucer’s depiction of her was rather less ambiguously indulgent and more deliberately disparaging than has often been allowed. Although the Second Nun, who accompanies the Prioress, is not described in detail in the ‘General Prologue’, her tale does reveal something of her character and piety. Together the Prioress and the Second Nun suggest something of the negotiations between anti-feminist theory and the actualities of everyday life which women had to make in order to wield authority.

AB - Although there has been a mass of work on the Prioress and the nature of her femininity, scholars have paid little attention to the relationship between her gender and her position of authority as the head of a religious house Taking account of the Prioress’s position as an office-holder in an analysis of her representation suggests that Chaucer’s depiction of her was rather less ambiguously indulgent and more deliberately disparaging than has often been allowed. Although the Second Nun, who accompanies the Prioress, is not described in detail in the ‘General Prologue’, her tale does reveal something of her character and piety. Together the Prioress and the Second Nun suggest something of the negotiations between anti-feminist theory and the actualities of everyday life which women had to make in order to wield authority.

KW - Chaucer's Prioress

KW - Second Nun

KW - female authority

KW - nunneries

KW - female saints

KW - General Prologue

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689545.001.0001

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689545.001.0001

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780199689545

SP - 94

EP - 113

BT - Historians on Chaucer

A2 - Rigby, Stephen H.

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - Oxford

ER -

Lewis K. The Prioress and the Second Nun. In Rigby SH, editor, Historians on Chaucer: The 'General Prologue' to the Canterbury Tales. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. p. 94-113 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689545.001.0001, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689545.003.0006