The relationship between inpatient mental health ward design and aggression

Michelle Rogerson, Alina Haines-Delmont, Rhiannah McCabe, Andrew Brown, Richard Whittington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the relationship between the physical design of mental health care facilities and the occurrence of aggressive behaviour. Methods: A cross-national survey including a large number of forensic and non-forensic inpatient wards (n = 101) across seven National Health Service (NHS) trusts was conducted. A detailed Ward Features Checklist was designed and completed for each ward. These ward features were then compared on two dimensions with records of aggressive incidents on the wards. Clinical ward staff on participating wards (n = 191) also completed an online survey including questions from the Work Safety Scale (WSS) to assess subjective perceptions of safety at work. Results: Physical aggression was associated with higher staffing and greater space availability (Ward Features Checklist Dimension 1: Incident Rate Ratio = 2.19); and increased comfort and facilities and external views of urban environments (Ward Features Checklist Dimension 2: Incident Rate Ratio = 1.24). Conclusion: The findings here are amongst the first to challenge ideas about the relationship between staff-patient ratios, certain space characteristics and aggressive incidents. The observed associations are, however, underpinned by complex organisational and relational factors which need to be further explored to fully understand the overall context. There are implications for service user and staff safety training initiatives and for future mental health ward design.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101670
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Environmental Psychology
Volume77
Early online date18 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The relationship between inpatient mental health ward design and aggression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this