The Retrospective Detective: Cognitive Bias and the Cold case Investigation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Much of the available research on police decision-making in criminal investigations tends to focus on the detrimental effects of cognitive bias in live/current homicide investigations, and not on how it might have a negative influence on investigative decision-making in cold case homicides. This arguably indicates the existence of a common assumption that, live or cold, criminal investigations require the same decision-making and so are vulnerable to the same bias and in the same ways. This chapter suggests that the very term ‘cold case’ is likely to have a different psychological bias effect on investigators of cold cases and to pose potentially a far stronger negative influence on the decisions that are made in cold as opposed to live cases. The idea that cold cases necessitate a different ‘investigative mindset’ to live cases is posited here, along with the suggestion that investigator confidence is likely to be undermined by an inherent framing effect which comes into play when people are told that they are to investigate a cold case, that does not with live cases. Also discussed are the implications of having to make decisions based on the result of numerous previous decisions made by prior police investigators, might have on cold-case investigators. This may in turn serve to increase the likelihood of confirmation bias when investigators review cold cases as they make decisions within a far more pessimistic frame than they do for live cases. The chapter ends with a tentative research agenda for increasing our understanding of decision-making processes in cold case homicide investigations.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationDecision Making in Police Enquiries and Critical Incidents
Subtitle of host publicationWhat Really Works?
EditorsMark Roycroft, Jason Roach
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan UK
Chapter8
Pages129-149
Number of pages21
Volume1
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781349958474
ISBN (Print)9781349958467, 1349958468
Publication statusPublished - 4 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Homicide
Decision Making
Police
Research
Psychology

Cite this

Roach, J. (2019). The Retrospective Detective: Cognitive Bias and the Cold case Investigation. In M. Roycroft, & J. Roach (Eds.), Decision Making in Police Enquiries and Critical Incidents: What Really Works? (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 129-149). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Roach, Jason. / The Retrospective Detective : Cognitive Bias and the Cold case Investigation. Decision Making in Police Enquiries and Critical Incidents: What Really Works?. editor / Mark Roycroft ; Jason Roach. Vol. 1 1. ed. London : Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2019. pp. 129-149
@inbook{fd1c8baa472b4af69193deea50c1ea6c,
title = "The Retrospective Detective: Cognitive Bias and the Cold case Investigation",
abstract = "Much of the available research on police decision-making in criminal investigations tends to focus on the detrimental effects of cognitive bias in live/current homicide investigations, and not on how it might have a negative influence on investigative decision-making in cold case homicides. This arguably indicates the existence of a common assumption that, live or cold, criminal investigations require the same decision-making and so are vulnerable to the same bias and in the same ways. This chapter suggests that the very term ‘cold case’ is likely to have a different psychological bias effect on investigators of cold cases and to pose potentially a far stronger negative influence on the decisions that are made in cold as opposed to live cases. The idea that cold cases necessitate a different ‘investigative mindset’ to live cases is posited here, along with the suggestion that investigator confidence is likely to be undermined by an inherent framing effect which comes into play when people are told that they are to investigate a cold case, that does not with live cases. Also discussed are the implications of having to make decisions based on the result of numerous previous decisions made by prior police investigators, might have on cold-case investigators. This may in turn serve to increase the likelihood of confirmation bias when investigators review cold cases as they make decisions within a far more pessimistic frame than they do for live cases. The chapter ends with a tentative research agenda for increasing our understanding of decision-making processes in cold case homicide investigations.",
keywords = "Omincompetent detective, Investigative decision-making, Cognitive bias and the homicide investigator, cold case homicide investigations",
author = "Jason Roach",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "4",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781349958467",
volume = "1",
pages = "129--149",
editor = "Mark Roycroft and Jason Roach",
booktitle = "Decision Making in Police Enquiries and Critical Incidents",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan UK",
edition = "1",

}

Roach, J 2019, The Retrospective Detective: Cognitive Bias and the Cold case Investigation. in M Roycroft & J Roach (eds), Decision Making in Police Enquiries and Critical Incidents: What Really Works?. 1 edn, vol. 1, Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 129-149.

The Retrospective Detective : Cognitive Bias and the Cold case Investigation. / Roach, Jason.

Decision Making in Police Enquiries and Critical Incidents: What Really Works?. ed. / Mark Roycroft; Jason Roach. Vol. 1 1. ed. London : Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2019. p. 129-149.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Retrospective Detective

T2 - Cognitive Bias and the Cold case Investigation

AU - Roach, Jason

PY - 2019/2/4

Y1 - 2019/2/4

N2 - Much of the available research on police decision-making in criminal investigations tends to focus on the detrimental effects of cognitive bias in live/current homicide investigations, and not on how it might have a negative influence on investigative decision-making in cold case homicides. This arguably indicates the existence of a common assumption that, live or cold, criminal investigations require the same decision-making and so are vulnerable to the same bias and in the same ways. This chapter suggests that the very term ‘cold case’ is likely to have a different psychological bias effect on investigators of cold cases and to pose potentially a far stronger negative influence on the decisions that are made in cold as opposed to live cases. The idea that cold cases necessitate a different ‘investigative mindset’ to live cases is posited here, along with the suggestion that investigator confidence is likely to be undermined by an inherent framing effect which comes into play when people are told that they are to investigate a cold case, that does not with live cases. Also discussed are the implications of having to make decisions based on the result of numerous previous decisions made by prior police investigators, might have on cold-case investigators. This may in turn serve to increase the likelihood of confirmation bias when investigators review cold cases as they make decisions within a far more pessimistic frame than they do for live cases. The chapter ends with a tentative research agenda for increasing our understanding of decision-making processes in cold case homicide investigations.

AB - Much of the available research on police decision-making in criminal investigations tends to focus on the detrimental effects of cognitive bias in live/current homicide investigations, and not on how it might have a negative influence on investigative decision-making in cold case homicides. This arguably indicates the existence of a common assumption that, live or cold, criminal investigations require the same decision-making and so are vulnerable to the same bias and in the same ways. This chapter suggests that the very term ‘cold case’ is likely to have a different psychological bias effect on investigators of cold cases and to pose potentially a far stronger negative influence on the decisions that are made in cold as opposed to live cases. The idea that cold cases necessitate a different ‘investigative mindset’ to live cases is posited here, along with the suggestion that investigator confidence is likely to be undermined by an inherent framing effect which comes into play when people are told that they are to investigate a cold case, that does not with live cases. Also discussed are the implications of having to make decisions based on the result of numerous previous decisions made by prior police investigators, might have on cold-case investigators. This may in turn serve to increase the likelihood of confirmation bias when investigators review cold cases as they make decisions within a far more pessimistic frame than they do for live cases. The chapter ends with a tentative research agenda for increasing our understanding of decision-making processes in cold case homicide investigations.

KW - Omincompetent detective

KW - Investigative decision-making

KW - Cognitive bias and the homicide investigator

KW - cold case homicide investigations

UR - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-349-95847-4_8

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781349958467

SN - 1349958468

VL - 1

SP - 129

EP - 149

BT - Decision Making in Police Enquiries and Critical Incidents

A2 - Roycroft, Mark

A2 - Roach, Jason

PB - Palgrave Macmillan UK

CY - London

ER -

Roach J. The Retrospective Detective: Cognitive Bias and the Cold case Investigation. In Roycroft M, Roach J, editors, Decision Making in Police Enquiries and Critical Incidents: What Really Works?. 1 ed. Vol. 1. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 2019. p. 129-149