The right to inclusive education: Why is there so much opposition to its implementation?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) proclaims the right to inclusive education, and much attention is being given to the goal of inclusive education in debates on human rights, there are doubts as to whether this right has led to a new direction in policy-making. The under-researched question is: why is there so much opposition to the implementation of the right to inclusive education? This paper examines the question by distinguishing between both the concept and practice of inclusive education. Using a specific interdisciplinary approach in order to critically analyse a legal norm, the paper looks into the very meaning of inclusive education by utilising some central conclusions from disability studies to appraise the ideal of inclusive education, and seeks to resolve related challenges by drawing upon political philosophy to investigate pragmatic solutions to the obstacles to inclusive education. This paper claims that it is thereby possible to incorporate the element of actual achievability into such an ideal.

LanguageEnglish
Pages396-415
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Law in Context
Volume14
Issue number3
Early online date13 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

opposition
education
aim of education
goal of education
disability studies
legal norm
political philosophy
pragmatics
human rights
disability
human being

Cite this

@article{f58a3bf2265345f1b221011fe948d295,
title = "The right to inclusive education: Why is there so much opposition to its implementation?",
abstract = "Although the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) proclaims the right to inclusive education, and much attention is being given to the goal of inclusive education in debates on human rights, there are doubts as to whether this right has led to a new direction in policy-making. The under-researched question is: why is there so much opposition to the implementation of the right to inclusive education? This paper examines the question by distinguishing between both the concept and practice of inclusive education. Using a specific interdisciplinary approach in order to critically analyse a legal norm, the paper looks into the very meaning of inclusive education by utilising some central conclusions from disability studies to appraise the ideal of inclusive education, and seeks to resolve related challenges by drawing upon political philosophy to investigate pragmatic solutions to the obstacles to inclusive education. This paper claims that it is thereby possible to incorporate the element of actual achievability into such an ideal.",
author = "{De Beco}, Gauthier",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1744552317000532",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "396--415",
journal = "International Journal of Law in Context",
issn = "1744-5523",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

The right to inclusive education : Why is there so much opposition to its implementation? / De Beco, Gauthier.

In: International Journal of Law in Context, Vol. 14, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 396-415.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The right to inclusive education

T2 - International Journal of Law in Context

AU - De Beco, Gauthier

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Although the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) proclaims the right to inclusive education, and much attention is being given to the goal of inclusive education in debates on human rights, there are doubts as to whether this right has led to a new direction in policy-making. The under-researched question is: why is there so much opposition to the implementation of the right to inclusive education? This paper examines the question by distinguishing between both the concept and practice of inclusive education. Using a specific interdisciplinary approach in order to critically analyse a legal norm, the paper looks into the very meaning of inclusive education by utilising some central conclusions from disability studies to appraise the ideal of inclusive education, and seeks to resolve related challenges by drawing upon political philosophy to investigate pragmatic solutions to the obstacles to inclusive education. This paper claims that it is thereby possible to incorporate the element of actual achievability into such an ideal.

AB - Although the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) proclaims the right to inclusive education, and much attention is being given to the goal of inclusive education in debates on human rights, there are doubts as to whether this right has led to a new direction in policy-making. The under-researched question is: why is there so much opposition to the implementation of the right to inclusive education? This paper examines the question by distinguishing between both the concept and practice of inclusive education. Using a specific interdisciplinary approach in order to critically analyse a legal norm, the paper looks into the very meaning of inclusive education by utilising some central conclusions from disability studies to appraise the ideal of inclusive education, and seeks to resolve related challenges by drawing upon political philosophy to investigate pragmatic solutions to the obstacles to inclusive education. This paper claims that it is thereby possible to incorporate the element of actual achievability into such an ideal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042230360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1744552317000532

DO - 10.1017/S1744552317000532

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 396

EP - 415

JO - International Journal of Law in Context

JF - International Journal of Law in Context

SN - 1744-5523

IS - 3

ER -