The Role of Abduction in Production of New Ideas in Design

Lauri Koskela, Sami Paavola, Ehud Kroll

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The pragmatist philosopher Peirce insisted that besides deduction and induction there is a third main form of inference, abduction, which is the only type of inference capable of producing new ideas. Also he defined abduction as a stage of the methodological process in science, where hypotheses are formed to explain anomalies. Basing on these seminal ideas, scholars have proposed modified, widened or alternative definitions of abduction and devised taxonomies of abductive inferences. Influenced by Peirce’s seminal writings and subsequent treatments on abduction in philosophy of science, design scholars have in the last 40 years endeavoured to shed light on design by means of the concept of abduction. The first treatment was provided by March in 1976. He viewed that abduction, which he called “productive reasoning”, is the key mode of reasoning in design. He also presented a three-step cyclic design process, similar to Peirce’s methodological process in science. Among the many other later treatments of design abduction, Roozenburg’s definition of explanatory and innovative abduction is noteworthy. However, an evaluation of the related literature suggests that research into abduction in design is still in an undeveloped stage. This research shows gaps in coverage, lack of depth and diverging outcomes. By focusing on the differences between science and design as well as on empirical knowledge of different phenomena comprising design, new conceptions of abduction in design are derived. Given the differences of context, abduction in design shows characteristics not yet found or identified in science. For example, abduction can occur in connection to practically all inference types in design; it is a property of an inference besides an inference itself. A number of the most important abductive inference types as they occur in design are identified and discussed in more detail.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvancements in the Philosophy of Design
EditorsPieter Vermaas, Stéphane Vial
PublisherSpringer, Cham
Pages153-183
Number of pages31
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9783319733029
ISBN (Print)9783319733012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Mar 2018

Publication series

NameDesign Research Foundations
PublisherSpringer
ISSN (Print)2366-4622

Fingerprint

Abduction
Inference
Abductive Inference
Deduction
Philosopher
Pragmatist
Evaluation
Taxonomy
Anomaly
Conception
Philosophy of Science
Induction

Cite this

Koskela, L., Paavola, S., & Kroll, E. (2018). The Role of Abduction in Production of New Ideas in Design. In P. Vermaas, & S. Vial (Eds.), Advancements in the Philosophy of Design (1 ed., pp. 153-183). (Design Research Foundations). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_8
Koskela, Lauri ; Paavola, Sami ; Kroll, Ehud. / The Role of Abduction in Production of New Ideas in Design. Advancements in the Philosophy of Design. editor / Pieter Vermaas ; Stéphane Vial. 1. ed. Springer, Cham, 2018. pp. 153-183 (Design Research Foundations).
@inbook{792aeb8e76164103afb69201a663d603,
title = "The Role of Abduction in Production of New Ideas in Design",
abstract = "The pragmatist philosopher Peirce insisted that besides deduction and induction there is a third main form of inference, abduction, which is the only type of inference capable of producing new ideas. Also he defined abduction as a stage of the methodological process in science, where hypotheses are formed to explain anomalies. Basing on these seminal ideas, scholars have proposed modified, widened or alternative definitions of abduction and devised taxonomies of abductive inferences. Influenced by Peirce’s seminal writings and subsequent treatments on abduction in philosophy of science, design scholars have in the last 40 years endeavoured to shed light on design by means of the concept of abduction. The first treatment was provided by March in 1976. He viewed that abduction, which he called “productive reasoning”, is the key mode of reasoning in design. He also presented a three-step cyclic design process, similar to Peirce’s methodological process in science. Among the many other later treatments of design abduction, Roozenburg’s definition of explanatory and innovative abduction is noteworthy. However, an evaluation of the related literature suggests that research into abduction in design is still in an undeveloped stage. This research shows gaps in coverage, lack of depth and diverging outcomes. By focusing on the differences between science and design as well as on empirical knowledge of different phenomena comprising design, new conceptions of abduction in design are derived. Given the differences of context, abduction in design shows characteristics not yet found or identified in science. For example, abduction can occur in connection to practically all inference types in design; it is a property of an inference besides an inference itself. A number of the most important abductive inference types as they occur in design are identified and discussed in more detail.",
keywords = "Types of abduction , Design, Design Reasoning",
author = "Lauri Koskela and Sami Paavola and Ehud Kroll",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319733012",
series = "Design Research Foundations",
publisher = "Springer, Cham",
pages = "153--183",
editor = "Pieter Vermaas and St{\'e}phane Vial",
booktitle = "Advancements in the Philosophy of Design",
edition = "1",

}

Koskela, L, Paavola, S & Kroll, E 2018, The Role of Abduction in Production of New Ideas in Design. in P Vermaas & S Vial (eds), Advancements in the Philosophy of Design. 1 edn, Design Research Foundations, Springer, Cham, pp. 153-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_8

The Role of Abduction in Production of New Ideas in Design. / Koskela, Lauri; Paavola, Sami; Kroll, Ehud.

Advancements in the Philosophy of Design. ed. / Pieter Vermaas; Stéphane Vial. 1. ed. Springer, Cham, 2018. p. 153-183 (Design Research Foundations).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Role of Abduction in Production of New Ideas in Design

AU - Koskela, Lauri

AU - Paavola, Sami

AU - Kroll, Ehud

PY - 2018/3/3

Y1 - 2018/3/3

N2 - The pragmatist philosopher Peirce insisted that besides deduction and induction there is a third main form of inference, abduction, which is the only type of inference capable of producing new ideas. Also he defined abduction as a stage of the methodological process in science, where hypotheses are formed to explain anomalies. Basing on these seminal ideas, scholars have proposed modified, widened or alternative definitions of abduction and devised taxonomies of abductive inferences. Influenced by Peirce’s seminal writings and subsequent treatments on abduction in philosophy of science, design scholars have in the last 40 years endeavoured to shed light on design by means of the concept of abduction. The first treatment was provided by March in 1976. He viewed that abduction, which he called “productive reasoning”, is the key mode of reasoning in design. He also presented a three-step cyclic design process, similar to Peirce’s methodological process in science. Among the many other later treatments of design abduction, Roozenburg’s definition of explanatory and innovative abduction is noteworthy. However, an evaluation of the related literature suggests that research into abduction in design is still in an undeveloped stage. This research shows gaps in coverage, lack of depth and diverging outcomes. By focusing on the differences between science and design as well as on empirical knowledge of different phenomena comprising design, new conceptions of abduction in design are derived. Given the differences of context, abduction in design shows characteristics not yet found or identified in science. For example, abduction can occur in connection to practically all inference types in design; it is a property of an inference besides an inference itself. A number of the most important abductive inference types as they occur in design are identified and discussed in more detail.

AB - The pragmatist philosopher Peirce insisted that besides deduction and induction there is a third main form of inference, abduction, which is the only type of inference capable of producing new ideas. Also he defined abduction as a stage of the methodological process in science, where hypotheses are formed to explain anomalies. Basing on these seminal ideas, scholars have proposed modified, widened or alternative definitions of abduction and devised taxonomies of abductive inferences. Influenced by Peirce’s seminal writings and subsequent treatments on abduction in philosophy of science, design scholars have in the last 40 years endeavoured to shed light on design by means of the concept of abduction. The first treatment was provided by March in 1976. He viewed that abduction, which he called “productive reasoning”, is the key mode of reasoning in design. He also presented a three-step cyclic design process, similar to Peirce’s methodological process in science. Among the many other later treatments of design abduction, Roozenburg’s definition of explanatory and innovative abduction is noteworthy. However, an evaluation of the related literature suggests that research into abduction in design is still in an undeveloped stage. This research shows gaps in coverage, lack of depth and diverging outcomes. By focusing on the differences between science and design as well as on empirical knowledge of different phenomena comprising design, new conceptions of abduction in design are derived. Given the differences of context, abduction in design shows characteristics not yet found or identified in science. For example, abduction can occur in connection to practically all inference types in design; it is a property of an inference besides an inference itself. A number of the most important abductive inference types as they occur in design are identified and discussed in more detail.

KW - Types of abduction

KW - Design

KW - Design Reasoning

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_8

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_8

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319733012

T3 - Design Research Foundations

SP - 153

EP - 183

BT - Advancements in the Philosophy of Design

A2 - Vermaas, Pieter

A2 - Vial, Stéphane

PB - Springer, Cham

ER -

Koskela L, Paavola S, Kroll E. The Role of Abduction in Production of New Ideas in Design. In Vermaas P, Vial S, editors, Advancements in the Philosophy of Design. 1 ed. Springer, Cham. 2018. p. 153-183. (Design Research Foundations). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_8