The role of ideology in evaluations of (in)appropriate behaviour in student-teacher relationships in China

Daniel Kadar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper I examine Chinese perceptions of (in)appropriateness and offence from a cross-cultural pragmatic point of view, by exploring (in)appropriate evaluations in the context of a major social offence, and the influence of Confucian ideology on people’s evaluative tendencies. By doing so, I aim to contribute to pragmatic understandings of Confucianism as an ideology that underpins evaluative attitudes in Chinese culture. On the theoretical level, I argue that one needs to carefully examine dimensions of ideologies that underlie evaluative tendencies, and also the ways in which ideologies are invoked, rather than making sweeping claims. I believe that is possible to adopt ‘ideology’ as an analytic notion in interpersonal pragmatics and (im)politeness research, but only if the influence of ideology on interpersonal interaction and evaluative tendencies is captured with the aid of qualitative and quantitative evidence, that is, only as far as one avoids using a certain ideology as an umbrella term to analyse culturally-situated data.
LanguageEnglish
Pages33-56
Number of pages24
JournalPragmatics
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

student teacher
ideology
China
evaluation
pragmatics
Ideologies
offense
Confucianism
politeness
Student-teacher Relationships
Ideology
Evaluation
interaction
evidence

Cite this

@article{f1bd7d103c624a618ee54e3717636735,
title = "The role of ideology in evaluations of (in)appropriate behaviour in student-teacher relationships in China",
abstract = "In this paper I examine Chinese perceptions of (in)appropriateness and offence from a cross-cultural pragmatic point of view, by exploring (in)appropriate evaluations in the context of a major social offence, and the influence of Confucian ideology on people’s evaluative tendencies. By doing so, I aim to contribute to pragmatic understandings of Confucianism as an ideology that underpins evaluative attitudes in Chinese culture. On the theoretical level, I argue that one needs to carefully examine dimensions of ideologies that underlie evaluative tendencies, and also the ways in which ideologies are invoked, rather than making sweeping claims. I believe that is possible to adopt ‘ideology’ as an analytic notion in interpersonal pragmatics and (im)politeness research, but only if the influence of ideology on interpersonal interaction and evaluative tendencies is captured with the aid of qualitative and quantitative evidence, that is, only as far as one avoids using a certain ideology as an umbrella term to analyse culturally-situated data.",
keywords = "Linguistics, Ideology, Offence, Confucuanism, Evaluation, Inappropriateness",
author = "Daniel Kadar",
note = "Accepted date taken from Eprints as none available on publisher's website. Not OA compliant; no full text available on Eprints. Full text of article currently available on publisher's website as sample article. SH 12/9/17.",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1075/prag.27.1.02kad",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "33--56",
journal = "Pragmatics",
issn = "1018-2101",
publisher = "International Pragmatics Association",
number = "1",

}

The role of ideology in evaluations of (in)appropriate behaviour in student-teacher relationships in China. / Kadar, Daniel.

In: Pragmatics, Vol. 27, No. 1, 06.02.2017, p. 33-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of ideology in evaluations of (in)appropriate behaviour in student-teacher relationships in China

AU - Kadar, Daniel

N1 - Accepted date taken from Eprints as none available on publisher's website. Not OA compliant; no full text available on Eprints. Full text of article currently available on publisher's website as sample article. SH 12/9/17.

PY - 2017/2/6

Y1 - 2017/2/6

N2 - In this paper I examine Chinese perceptions of (in)appropriateness and offence from a cross-cultural pragmatic point of view, by exploring (in)appropriate evaluations in the context of a major social offence, and the influence of Confucian ideology on people’s evaluative tendencies. By doing so, I aim to contribute to pragmatic understandings of Confucianism as an ideology that underpins evaluative attitudes in Chinese culture. On the theoretical level, I argue that one needs to carefully examine dimensions of ideologies that underlie evaluative tendencies, and also the ways in which ideologies are invoked, rather than making sweeping claims. I believe that is possible to adopt ‘ideology’ as an analytic notion in interpersonal pragmatics and (im)politeness research, but only if the influence of ideology on interpersonal interaction and evaluative tendencies is captured with the aid of qualitative and quantitative evidence, that is, only as far as one avoids using a certain ideology as an umbrella term to analyse culturally-situated data.

AB - In this paper I examine Chinese perceptions of (in)appropriateness and offence from a cross-cultural pragmatic point of view, by exploring (in)appropriate evaluations in the context of a major social offence, and the influence of Confucian ideology on people’s evaluative tendencies. By doing so, I aim to contribute to pragmatic understandings of Confucianism as an ideology that underpins evaluative attitudes in Chinese culture. On the theoretical level, I argue that one needs to carefully examine dimensions of ideologies that underlie evaluative tendencies, and also the ways in which ideologies are invoked, rather than making sweeping claims. I believe that is possible to adopt ‘ideology’ as an analytic notion in interpersonal pragmatics and (im)politeness research, but only if the influence of ideology on interpersonal interaction and evaluative tendencies is captured with the aid of qualitative and quantitative evidence, that is, only as far as one avoids using a certain ideology as an umbrella term to analyse culturally-situated data.

KW - Linguistics

KW - Ideology

KW - Offence

KW - Confucuanism

KW - Evaluation

KW - Inappropriateness

U2 - 10.1075/prag.27.1.02kad

DO - 10.1075/prag.27.1.02kad

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 33

EP - 56

JO - Pragmatics

T2 - Pragmatics

JF - Pragmatics

SN - 1018-2101

IS - 1

ER -