The Role of Patient Autonomy in Medical and Legal Approaches to HIV-antibody Testing in the United Kingdom

Samantha Halliday

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article considers whether there is ever justification for performing a HIV-antibody test without the patient’s consent, for example because a surgeon fears for his or her own safety, or in order to provide epidemiological information regarding the spread of HIV infection within the United Kingdom.
LanguageEnglish
Pages101–114
Number of pages14
JournalCambrian Law Review
Volume26
Publication statusPublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

autonomy
anxiety

Cite this

@article{1b5b002096d243d49e1516304e2c65fa,
title = "The Role of Patient Autonomy in Medical and Legal Approaches to HIV-antibody Testing in the United Kingdom",
abstract = "This article considers whether there is ever justification for performing a HIV-antibody test without the patient’s consent, for example because a surgeon fears for his or her own safety, or in order to provide epidemiological information regarding the spread of HIV infection within the United Kingdom.",
author = "Samantha Halliday",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "101–114",
journal = "Cambrian Law Review",
issn = "0084-8328",

}

The Role of Patient Autonomy in Medical and Legal Approaches to HIV-antibody Testing in the United Kingdom. / Halliday, Samantha.

In: Cambrian Law Review, Vol. 26, 1995, p. 101–114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Patient Autonomy in Medical and Legal Approaches to HIV-antibody Testing in the United Kingdom

AU - Halliday, Samantha

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - This article considers whether there is ever justification for performing a HIV-antibody test without the patient’s consent, for example because a surgeon fears for his or her own safety, or in order to provide epidemiological information regarding the spread of HIV infection within the United Kingdom.

AB - This article considers whether there is ever justification for performing a HIV-antibody test without the patient’s consent, for example because a surgeon fears for his or her own safety, or in order to provide epidemiological information regarding the spread of HIV infection within the United Kingdom.

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 101

EP - 114

JO - Cambrian Law Review

T2 - Cambrian Law Review

JF - Cambrian Law Review

SN - 0084-8328

ER -