The role of timing and corrective feedback in L2 discussion activities

Diana Pili-Moss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article I focus on the role of corrective feedback in fluency activities in second language acquisition research (SLA) compared to commonly adopted teaching methodology. The role of corrective feedback has changed significantly in recent years and both researchers and practitioners currently agree on its importance for the development of language accuracy in communicative tasks. However, researchers’ and practitioners’ views are still divergent especially in relation to the use of immediate correction of non-target utterances in spoken interaction. Most practitioners consider delayed feedback as the strategy of choice in these contexts, whereas SLA researchers maintain that immediate feedback is preferable. As yet, research has not focused enough on the study of delayed feedback to provide conclusive evidence to support or challenge current teaching practice. In Section 1 I present an overview of the main feedback strategies discussed in the current SLA literature, including recasts and elicitations. In Section 2 and 3 I review current ideas on how to provide feedback in fluency activities according to SLA interactional approaches and commonly adopted teaching practice. I will also present an example of a speaking activity where opportunities for feedback were designed according to current teaching methodology.
LanguageEnglish
Pages53-62
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

language acquisition
teaching practice
methodology
Teaching
research approach
speaking
interaction
language
evidence

Cite this

@article{596052370b2345ca88c7761f766d59df,
title = "The role of timing and corrective feedback in L2 discussion activities",
abstract = "In this article I focus on the role of corrective feedback in fluency activities in second language acquisition research (SLA) compared to commonly adopted teaching methodology. The role of corrective feedback has changed significantly in recent years and both researchers and practitioners currently agree on its importance for the development of language accuracy in communicative tasks. However, researchers’ and practitioners’ views are still divergent especially in relation to the use of immediate correction of non-target utterances in spoken interaction. Most practitioners consider delayed feedback as the strategy of choice in these contexts, whereas SLA researchers maintain that immediate feedback is preferable. As yet, research has not focused enough on the study of delayed feedback to provide conclusive evidence to support or challenge current teaching practice. In Section 1 I present an overview of the main feedback strategies discussed in the current SLA literature, including recasts and elicitations. In Section 2 and 3 I review current ideas on how to provide feedback in fluency activities according to SLA interactional approaches and commonly adopted teaching practice. I will also present an example of a speaking activity where opportunities for feedback were designed according to current teaching methodology.",
author = "Diana Pili-Moss",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.18848/2327-7963/CGP/v19i04/48938",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "53--62",
journal = "International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum",
number = "4",

}

The role of timing and corrective feedback in L2 discussion activities. / Pili-Moss, Diana.

In: International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2013, p. 53-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of timing and corrective feedback in L2 discussion activities

AU - Pili-Moss, Diana

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In this article I focus on the role of corrective feedback in fluency activities in second language acquisition research (SLA) compared to commonly adopted teaching methodology. The role of corrective feedback has changed significantly in recent years and both researchers and practitioners currently agree on its importance for the development of language accuracy in communicative tasks. However, researchers’ and practitioners’ views are still divergent especially in relation to the use of immediate correction of non-target utterances in spoken interaction. Most practitioners consider delayed feedback as the strategy of choice in these contexts, whereas SLA researchers maintain that immediate feedback is preferable. As yet, research has not focused enough on the study of delayed feedback to provide conclusive evidence to support or challenge current teaching practice. In Section 1 I present an overview of the main feedback strategies discussed in the current SLA literature, including recasts and elicitations. In Section 2 and 3 I review current ideas on how to provide feedback in fluency activities according to SLA interactional approaches and commonly adopted teaching practice. I will also present an example of a speaking activity where opportunities for feedback were designed according to current teaching methodology.

AB - In this article I focus on the role of corrective feedback in fluency activities in second language acquisition research (SLA) compared to commonly adopted teaching methodology. The role of corrective feedback has changed significantly in recent years and both researchers and practitioners currently agree on its importance for the development of language accuracy in communicative tasks. However, researchers’ and practitioners’ views are still divergent especially in relation to the use of immediate correction of non-target utterances in spoken interaction. Most practitioners consider delayed feedback as the strategy of choice in these contexts, whereas SLA researchers maintain that immediate feedback is preferable. As yet, research has not focused enough on the study of delayed feedback to provide conclusive evidence to support or challenge current teaching practice. In Section 1 I present an overview of the main feedback strategies discussed in the current SLA literature, including recasts and elicitations. In Section 2 and 3 I review current ideas on how to provide feedback in fluency activities according to SLA interactional approaches and commonly adopted teaching practice. I will also present an example of a speaking activity where opportunities for feedback were designed according to current teaching methodology.

U2 - 10.18848/2327-7963/CGP/v19i04/48938

DO - 10.18848/2327-7963/CGP/v19i04/48938

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 53

EP - 62

JO - International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum

T2 - International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum

JF - International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum

IS - 4

ER -