The rosenberg self-esteem scale

A bifactor answer to a two-factor question?

Michael T. McKay, Daniel Boduszek, Séamus A. Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite its long-standing and widespread use, disagreement remains regarding the structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). In particular, concern remains regarding the degree to which the scale assesses self-esteem as a unidimensional or multidimensional (positive and negative self-esteem) construct. Using a sample of 3,862 high school students in the United Kingdom, 4 models were tested: (a) a unidimensional model, (b) a correlated 2-factor model in which the 2 latent variables are represented by positive and negative self-esteem, (c) a hierarchical model, and (d) a bifactor model. The totality of results including item loadings, goodness-of-fit indexes, reliability estimates, and correlations with self-efficacy measures all supported the bifactor model, suggesting that the 2 hypothesized factors are better understood as "grouping" factors rather than as representative of latent constructs. Accordingly, this study supports the unidimensionality of the RSES and the scoring of all 10 items to produce a global self-esteem score.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)654-660
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume96
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2014

Fingerprint

Self Concept
Self Efficacy
Self-esteem
Students

Cite this

@article{51014a2423d743ca8ac8dfc0bc1f3d5b,
title = "The rosenberg self-esteem scale: A bifactor answer to a two-factor question?",
abstract = "Despite its long-standing and widespread use, disagreement remains regarding the structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). In particular, concern remains regarding the degree to which the scale assesses self-esteem as a unidimensional or multidimensional (positive and negative self-esteem) construct. Using a sample of 3,862 high school students in the United Kingdom, 4 models were tested: (a) a unidimensional model, (b) a correlated 2-factor model in which the 2 latent variables are represented by positive and negative self-esteem, (c) a hierarchical model, and (d) a bifactor model. The totality of results including item loadings, goodness-of-fit indexes, reliability estimates, and correlations with self-efficacy measures all supported the bifactor model, suggesting that the 2 hypothesized factors are better understood as {"}grouping{"} factors rather than as representative of latent constructs. Accordingly, this study supports the unidimensionality of the RSES and the scoring of all 10 items to produce a global self-esteem score.",
author = "McKay, {Michael T.} and Daniel Boduszek and Harvey, {S{\'e}amus A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/00223891.2014.923436",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "654--660",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

The rosenberg self-esteem scale : A bifactor answer to a two-factor question? / McKay, Michael T.; Boduszek, Daniel; Harvey, Séamus A.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 96, No. 6, 05.11.2014, p. 654-660.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rosenberg self-esteem scale

T2 - A bifactor answer to a two-factor question?

AU - McKay, Michael T.

AU - Boduszek, Daniel

AU - Harvey, Séamus A.

PY - 2014/11/5

Y1 - 2014/11/5

N2 - Despite its long-standing and widespread use, disagreement remains regarding the structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). In particular, concern remains regarding the degree to which the scale assesses self-esteem as a unidimensional or multidimensional (positive and negative self-esteem) construct. Using a sample of 3,862 high school students in the United Kingdom, 4 models were tested: (a) a unidimensional model, (b) a correlated 2-factor model in which the 2 latent variables are represented by positive and negative self-esteem, (c) a hierarchical model, and (d) a bifactor model. The totality of results including item loadings, goodness-of-fit indexes, reliability estimates, and correlations with self-efficacy measures all supported the bifactor model, suggesting that the 2 hypothesized factors are better understood as "grouping" factors rather than as representative of latent constructs. Accordingly, this study supports the unidimensionality of the RSES and the scoring of all 10 items to produce a global self-esteem score.

AB - Despite its long-standing and widespread use, disagreement remains regarding the structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). In particular, concern remains regarding the degree to which the scale assesses self-esteem as a unidimensional or multidimensional (positive and negative self-esteem) construct. Using a sample of 3,862 high school students in the United Kingdom, 4 models were tested: (a) a unidimensional model, (b) a correlated 2-factor model in which the 2 latent variables are represented by positive and negative self-esteem, (c) a hierarchical model, and (d) a bifactor model. The totality of results including item loadings, goodness-of-fit indexes, reliability estimates, and correlations with self-efficacy measures all supported the bifactor model, suggesting that the 2 hypothesized factors are better understood as "grouping" factors rather than as representative of latent constructs. Accordingly, this study supports the unidimensionality of the RSES and the scoring of all 10 items to produce a global self-esteem score.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908599827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2014.923436

DO - 10.1080/00223891.2014.923436

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 654

EP - 660

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 6

ER -