The scope of pharmacy ethics: An evaluation of the international research literature, 1990--2002

Joy Wingfield, Paul Bissell, Claire Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper attempts to provide a critical overview of international published discourse relating to ethical issues in pharmacy practice from 1990 to 2002. We found that there is little research literature specifically addressing ethics in pharmacy practice and almost none addressing fundamental philosophical issues or values for pharmacy ethics. There is no dedicated journal for pharmacy ethics. Most material relating to pharmacy ethics is articulated as codes or pronouncements from professional bodies, as opinion or reflection in textbooks and in debate such as letters and articles. However, this should not be taken to mean that pharmacy and ethics are strangers; simply that such matters are not frequently analysed in published pharmacy literature. The presumption is usually that most matters of pharmacy ethics are very familiar and require no exploration or explanation.

Where the research literature does target ethical issues, the most common method is to employ “the scenario approach”. This term describes the technique of using a vignette or scenario from actual pharmacy practice and then exploring a variety of possible options to identify one or more defensible solutions. The vast majority of scenarios related to the delivery of healthcare per se; rather fewer derived from delivery of healthcare in a commercial environment. One notable exception to this approach is the body of work by Latif and colleagues on moral reasoning and community pharmacy practice.

Our review suggests there is a need for the knowledge base in pharmacy ethics to be systematised and integrated into the wider scheme of general healthcare ethics. The principal areas in which research is needed include, how best to teach and assess “ethical competence” before practice; how to develop and update this competence in practising pharmacists; and how the business environment, particularly where there are corporate values and reward systems in operation, affects ethical competence. In addition, general research in pharmacy practice may benefit from a greater awareness and enquiry as to the ethical issues raised by the projects being undertaken.
LanguageEnglish
Pages2383-2396
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume58
Issue number12
Early online date21 Oct 2003
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pharmacy Ethics
moral philosophy
Ethics
evaluation
Mental Competency
Delivery of Health Care
Research
scenario
Knowledge Bases
Textbooks
Pharmacies
literature
Evaluation
Reward
Pharmacists

Cite this

@article{54ab116c24874bdd99a1a3a1bf1aca58,
title = "The scope of pharmacy ethics: An evaluation of the international research literature, 1990--2002",
abstract = "This paper attempts to provide a critical overview of international published discourse relating to ethical issues in pharmacy practice from 1990 to 2002. We found that there is little research literature specifically addressing ethics in pharmacy practice and almost none addressing fundamental philosophical issues or values for pharmacy ethics. There is no dedicated journal for pharmacy ethics. Most material relating to pharmacy ethics is articulated as codes or pronouncements from professional bodies, as opinion or reflection in textbooks and in debate such as letters and articles. However, this should not be taken to mean that pharmacy and ethics are strangers; simply that such matters are not frequently analysed in published pharmacy literature. The presumption is usually that most matters of pharmacy ethics are very familiar and require no exploration or explanation.Where the research literature does target ethical issues, the most common method is to employ “the scenario approach”. This term describes the technique of using a vignette or scenario from actual pharmacy practice and then exploring a variety of possible options to identify one or more defensible solutions. The vast majority of scenarios related to the delivery of healthcare per se; rather fewer derived from delivery of healthcare in a commercial environment. One notable exception to this approach is the body of work by Latif and colleagues on moral reasoning and community pharmacy practice.Our review suggests there is a need for the knowledge base in pharmacy ethics to be systematised and integrated into the wider scheme of general healthcare ethics. The principal areas in which research is needed include, how best to teach and assess “ethical competence” before practice; how to develop and update this competence in practising pharmacists; and how the business environment, particularly where there are corporate values and reward systems in operation, affects ethical competence. In addition, general research in pharmacy practice may benefit from a greater awareness and enquiry as to the ethical issues raised by the projects being undertaken.",
author = "Joy Wingfield and Paul Bissell and Claire Anderson",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "2383--2396",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "12",

}

The scope of pharmacy ethics : An evaluation of the international research literature, 1990--2002. / Wingfield, Joy; Bissell, Paul; Anderson, Claire.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 58, No. 12, 06.2004, p. 2383-2396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The scope of pharmacy ethics

T2 - Social Science and Medicine

AU - Wingfield, Joy

AU - Bissell, Paul

AU - Anderson, Claire

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - This paper attempts to provide a critical overview of international published discourse relating to ethical issues in pharmacy practice from 1990 to 2002. We found that there is little research literature specifically addressing ethics in pharmacy practice and almost none addressing fundamental philosophical issues or values for pharmacy ethics. There is no dedicated journal for pharmacy ethics. Most material relating to pharmacy ethics is articulated as codes or pronouncements from professional bodies, as opinion or reflection in textbooks and in debate such as letters and articles. However, this should not be taken to mean that pharmacy and ethics are strangers; simply that such matters are not frequently analysed in published pharmacy literature. The presumption is usually that most matters of pharmacy ethics are very familiar and require no exploration or explanation.Where the research literature does target ethical issues, the most common method is to employ “the scenario approach”. This term describes the technique of using a vignette or scenario from actual pharmacy practice and then exploring a variety of possible options to identify one or more defensible solutions. The vast majority of scenarios related to the delivery of healthcare per se; rather fewer derived from delivery of healthcare in a commercial environment. One notable exception to this approach is the body of work by Latif and colleagues on moral reasoning and community pharmacy practice.Our review suggests there is a need for the knowledge base in pharmacy ethics to be systematised and integrated into the wider scheme of general healthcare ethics. The principal areas in which research is needed include, how best to teach and assess “ethical competence” before practice; how to develop and update this competence in practising pharmacists; and how the business environment, particularly where there are corporate values and reward systems in operation, affects ethical competence. In addition, general research in pharmacy practice may benefit from a greater awareness and enquiry as to the ethical issues raised by the projects being undertaken.

AB - This paper attempts to provide a critical overview of international published discourse relating to ethical issues in pharmacy practice from 1990 to 2002. We found that there is little research literature specifically addressing ethics in pharmacy practice and almost none addressing fundamental philosophical issues or values for pharmacy ethics. There is no dedicated journal for pharmacy ethics. Most material relating to pharmacy ethics is articulated as codes or pronouncements from professional bodies, as opinion or reflection in textbooks and in debate such as letters and articles. However, this should not be taken to mean that pharmacy and ethics are strangers; simply that such matters are not frequently analysed in published pharmacy literature. The presumption is usually that most matters of pharmacy ethics are very familiar and require no exploration or explanation.Where the research literature does target ethical issues, the most common method is to employ “the scenario approach”. This term describes the technique of using a vignette or scenario from actual pharmacy practice and then exploring a variety of possible options to identify one or more defensible solutions. The vast majority of scenarios related to the delivery of healthcare per se; rather fewer derived from delivery of healthcare in a commercial environment. One notable exception to this approach is the body of work by Latif and colleagues on moral reasoning and community pharmacy practice.Our review suggests there is a need for the knowledge base in pharmacy ethics to be systematised and integrated into the wider scheme of general healthcare ethics. The principal areas in which research is needed include, how best to teach and assess “ethical competence” before practice; how to develop and update this competence in practising pharmacists; and how the business environment, particularly where there are corporate values and reward systems in operation, affects ethical competence. In addition, general research in pharmacy practice may benefit from a greater awareness and enquiry as to the ethical issues raised by the projects being undertaken.

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 2383

EP - 2396

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 12

ER -