The trench warfare of gender discrimination: evidence from academic promotions to full professor in Italy

Giulio Marini, Viviana Meschitti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we aim to understand if gender makes a difference in the path to promotion to full professor in Italian universities, drawing on data from 2013 to 2016. The new promotion system pursuant Gelmini Law (210/2010) in Italy implies to go through two steps. First, they have to obtain the national ASN system (fit-for-the-role national filter), based on merit measured via bibliometric and non-bibliometric indicators. This step does not mean to get a position, it only means to be able to apply for it at institutional level. We believe that discrimination based on gender may happen especially at institutional level as in comparison to ASN there is less transparency and more autonomy at institutional level. It is also hypothesised that discrimination based on gender may differ according to the percentage of women already at full professor rank by disciplinary field. We investigate gender inequality using a binary variable (promoted or not promoted along 2013 until 2016) controlling by scientific productivity, normalised number of available vacancies, result of national research evaluation (VQR – department of candidate’s affiliation), age, current rank-and-file position. Multilevel logistic regression demonstrates that among those who obtained the ASN and at parity of other conditions, men have around 24% more probability to be promoted at parity of scientific production, which reveals a relevant gender discrimination. Our findings have implications on theory about inequality regimes and might serve to reflect on how to improve practices at institutional level.
LanguageEnglish
Pages989-1006
Number of pages18
JournalScientometrics
Volume115
Issue number2
Early online date9 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

Military operations
warfare
Transparency
Vacancies
Logistics
Italy
discrimination
university teacher
promotion
Productivity
gender
evidence
evaluation research
transparency
candidacy
autonomy
productivity
logistics
regime
regression

Cite this

@article{ee3a901b8a374e52ae3f1166ee29702a,
title = "The trench warfare of gender discrimination: evidence from academic promotions to full professor in Italy",
abstract = "In this paper we aim to understand if gender makes a difference in the path to promotion to full professor in Italian universities, drawing on data from 2013 to 2016. The new promotion system pursuant Gelmini Law (210/2010) in Italy implies to go through two steps. First, they have to obtain the national ASN system (fit-for-the-role national filter), based on merit measured via bibliometric and non-bibliometric indicators. This step does not mean to get a position, it only means to be able to apply for it at institutional level. We believe that discrimination based on gender may happen especially at institutional level as in comparison to ASN there is less transparency and more autonomy at institutional level. It is also hypothesised that discrimination based on gender may differ according to the percentage of women already at full professor rank by disciplinary field. We investigate gender inequality using a binary variable (promoted or not promoted along 2013 until 2016) controlling by scientific productivity, normalised number of available vacancies, result of national research evaluation (VQR – department of candidate’s affiliation), age, current rank-and-file position. Multilevel logistic regression demonstrates that among those who obtained the ASN and at parity of other conditions, men have around 24{\%} more probability to be promoted at parity of scientific production, which reveals a relevant gender discrimination. Our findings have implications on theory about inequality regimes and might serve to reflect on how to improve practices at institutional level.",
keywords = "career advancement, promotion rate, scientific productivity, gender gap, universities, Italy, Scientific productivity, Promotion rate, Gender gap, Career advancement, Universities",
author = "Giulio Marini and Viviana Meschitti",
note = "This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Scientometrics. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2696-8",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-018-2696-8",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "989--1006",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

The trench warfare of gender discrimination : evidence from academic promotions to full professor in Italy. / Marini, Giulio; Meschitti, Viviana.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 115, No. 2, 01.05.2018, p. 989-1006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The trench warfare of gender discrimination

T2 - Scientometrics

AU - Marini, Giulio

AU - Meschitti, Viviana

N1 - This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Scientometrics. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2696-8

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - In this paper we aim to understand if gender makes a difference in the path to promotion to full professor in Italian universities, drawing on data from 2013 to 2016. The new promotion system pursuant Gelmini Law (210/2010) in Italy implies to go through two steps. First, they have to obtain the national ASN system (fit-for-the-role national filter), based on merit measured via bibliometric and non-bibliometric indicators. This step does not mean to get a position, it only means to be able to apply for it at institutional level. We believe that discrimination based on gender may happen especially at institutional level as in comparison to ASN there is less transparency and more autonomy at institutional level. It is also hypothesised that discrimination based on gender may differ according to the percentage of women already at full professor rank by disciplinary field. We investigate gender inequality using a binary variable (promoted or not promoted along 2013 until 2016) controlling by scientific productivity, normalised number of available vacancies, result of national research evaluation (VQR – department of candidate’s affiliation), age, current rank-and-file position. Multilevel logistic regression demonstrates that among those who obtained the ASN and at parity of other conditions, men have around 24% more probability to be promoted at parity of scientific production, which reveals a relevant gender discrimination. Our findings have implications on theory about inequality regimes and might serve to reflect on how to improve practices at institutional level.

AB - In this paper we aim to understand if gender makes a difference in the path to promotion to full professor in Italian universities, drawing on data from 2013 to 2016. The new promotion system pursuant Gelmini Law (210/2010) in Italy implies to go through two steps. First, they have to obtain the national ASN system (fit-for-the-role national filter), based on merit measured via bibliometric and non-bibliometric indicators. This step does not mean to get a position, it only means to be able to apply for it at institutional level. We believe that discrimination based on gender may happen especially at institutional level as in comparison to ASN there is less transparency and more autonomy at institutional level. It is also hypothesised that discrimination based on gender may differ according to the percentage of women already at full professor rank by disciplinary field. We investigate gender inequality using a binary variable (promoted or not promoted along 2013 until 2016) controlling by scientific productivity, normalised number of available vacancies, result of national research evaluation (VQR – department of candidate’s affiliation), age, current rank-and-file position. Multilevel logistic regression demonstrates that among those who obtained the ASN and at parity of other conditions, men have around 24% more probability to be promoted at parity of scientific production, which reveals a relevant gender discrimination. Our findings have implications on theory about inequality regimes and might serve to reflect on how to improve practices at institutional level.

KW - career advancement

KW - promotion rate

KW - scientific productivity

KW - gender gap

KW - universities

KW - Italy

KW - Scientific productivity

KW - Promotion rate

KW - Gender gap

KW - Career advancement

KW - Universities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043380969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-018-2696-8

DO - 10.1007/s11192-018-2696-8

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 989

EP - 1006

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 2

ER -