The two pillars of design theory

Method of analysis and rhetoric

Lauri Jaakko Koskela, Glenn Ballard

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the 1960's, there have been many initiatives for promoting theoretical understanding on design. However, in spite of definite progress, there are several puzzles and anomalies in the current theoretical landscape of design. We present an interpretation of the evolution of design theorizing that throws new light on these puzzles and anomalies. We contend that in the modern time, there have been two hidden inspirational sources for design theorizing, namely the method of analysis and rhetoric. As they concern different situations, their prescriptions in many ways differ. However, without explicit recourse to the sources, these mutually incompatible prescriptions, along with associated concepts and terms, have been mixed up in a confusing way. It is proposed that these two influences to design theory and practice have to be disentangled, to be able to act like two pillars supporting the phenomenon of designing. We hypothesize that actual design assignments require the mobilization of ideas and support from both pillars.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design for Harmonies Vol 2
Subtitle of host publicationDesign Theory and Research Methodology
EditorsUdo Lindemann, Srinivasan Venkataraman, Yong Se Kim, Sang Wong Lee, John Clarkson, Gaetano Cascini
Pages21-30
Number of pages10
Volume2
Publication statusPublished - 19 Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes
Event19th International Conference on Engineering Design: Design for Harmonies - Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Duration: 19 Aug 201322 Aug 2013
Conference number: 19

Publication series

NameICED

Conference

Conference19th International Conference on Engineering Design
Abbreviated titleICED 2013
CountryKorea, Republic of
CitySeoul
Period19/08/1322/08/13

Fingerprint

Anomaly
Design
Assignment
Term
Concepts
Influence
Interpretation

Cite this

Koskela, L. J., & Ballard, G. (2013). The two pillars of design theory: Method of analysis and rhetoric. In U. Lindemann, S. Venkataraman, Y. S. Kim, S. W. Lee, J. Clarkson, & G. Cascini (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design for Harmonies Vol 2: Design Theory and Research Methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 21-30). (ICED).
Koskela, Lauri Jaakko ; Ballard, Glenn. / The two pillars of design theory : Method of analysis and rhetoric. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design for Harmonies Vol 2: Design Theory and Research Methodology. editor / Udo Lindemann ; Srinivasan Venkataraman ; Yong Se Kim ; Sang Wong Lee ; John Clarkson ; Gaetano Cascini. Vol. 2 2013. pp. 21-30 (ICED).
@inproceedings{da2fb6b010d44870b56cb5e5349963c6,
title = "The two pillars of design theory: Method of analysis and rhetoric",
abstract = "Since the 1960's, there have been many initiatives for promoting theoretical understanding on design. However, in spite of definite progress, there are several puzzles and anomalies in the current theoretical landscape of design. We present an interpretation of the evolution of design theorizing that throws new light on these puzzles and anomalies. We contend that in the modern time, there have been two hidden inspirational sources for design theorizing, namely the method of analysis and rhetoric. As they concern different situations, their prescriptions in many ways differ. However, without explicit recourse to the sources, these mutually incompatible prescriptions, along with associated concepts and terms, have been mixed up in a confusing way. It is proposed that these two influences to design theory and practice have to be disentangled, to be able to act like two pillars supporting the phenomenon of designing. We hypothesize that actual design assignments require the mobilization of ideas and support from both pillars.",
keywords = "Design method, Design process, Design theory, Method of analysis, Rhetoric",
author = "Koskela, {Lauri Jaakko} and Glenn Ballard",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "19",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781904670452",
volume = "2",
series = "ICED",
pages = "21--30",
editor = "Udo Lindemann and Srinivasan Venkataraman and Kim, {Yong Se} and Lee, {Sang Wong} and John Clarkson and Gaetano Cascini",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design for Harmonies Vol 2",

}

Koskela, LJ & Ballard, G 2013, The two pillars of design theory: Method of analysis and rhetoric. in U Lindemann, S Venkataraman, YS Kim, SW Lee, J Clarkson & G Cascini (eds), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design for Harmonies Vol 2: Design Theory and Research Methodology. vol. 2, ICED, pp. 21-30, 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 19/08/13.

The two pillars of design theory : Method of analysis and rhetoric. / Koskela, Lauri Jaakko; Ballard, Glenn.

Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design for Harmonies Vol 2: Design Theory and Research Methodology. ed. / Udo Lindemann; Srinivasan Venkataraman; Yong Se Kim; Sang Wong Lee; John Clarkson; Gaetano Cascini. Vol. 2 2013. p. 21-30 (ICED).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - The two pillars of design theory

T2 - Method of analysis and rhetoric

AU - Koskela, Lauri Jaakko

AU - Ballard, Glenn

PY - 2013/8/19

Y1 - 2013/8/19

N2 - Since the 1960's, there have been many initiatives for promoting theoretical understanding on design. However, in spite of definite progress, there are several puzzles and anomalies in the current theoretical landscape of design. We present an interpretation of the evolution of design theorizing that throws new light on these puzzles and anomalies. We contend that in the modern time, there have been two hidden inspirational sources for design theorizing, namely the method of analysis and rhetoric. As they concern different situations, their prescriptions in many ways differ. However, without explicit recourse to the sources, these mutually incompatible prescriptions, along with associated concepts and terms, have been mixed up in a confusing way. It is proposed that these two influences to design theory and practice have to be disentangled, to be able to act like two pillars supporting the phenomenon of designing. We hypothesize that actual design assignments require the mobilization of ideas and support from both pillars.

AB - Since the 1960's, there have been many initiatives for promoting theoretical understanding on design. However, in spite of definite progress, there are several puzzles and anomalies in the current theoretical landscape of design. We present an interpretation of the evolution of design theorizing that throws new light on these puzzles and anomalies. We contend that in the modern time, there have been two hidden inspirational sources for design theorizing, namely the method of analysis and rhetoric. As they concern different situations, their prescriptions in many ways differ. However, without explicit recourse to the sources, these mutually incompatible prescriptions, along with associated concepts and terms, have been mixed up in a confusing way. It is proposed that these two influences to design theory and practice have to be disentangled, to be able to act like two pillars supporting the phenomenon of designing. We hypothesize that actual design assignments require the mobilization of ideas and support from both pillars.

KW - Design method

KW - Design process

KW - Design theory

KW - Method of analysis

KW - Rhetoric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897645177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781904670452

VL - 2

T3 - ICED

SP - 21

EP - 30

BT - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design for Harmonies Vol 2

A2 - Lindemann, Udo

A2 - Venkataraman, Srinivasan

A2 - Kim, Yong Se

A2 - Lee, Sang Wong

A2 - Clarkson, John

A2 - Cascini, Gaetano

ER -

Koskela LJ, Ballard G. The two pillars of design theory: Method of analysis and rhetoric. In Lindemann U, Venkataraman S, Kim YS, Lee SW, Clarkson J, Cascini G, editors, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, Design for Harmonies Vol 2: Design Theory and Research Methodology. Vol. 2. 2013. p. 21-30. (ICED).