The Work-to-Retirement Transition of Academic Staff: Attitudes and Experiences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the significance of the work-to-retirement transition for academic staff from a life course perspective and the manner in which individuals have managed the transition. Design/methodology/approach: In total, 32 semi-structured interviews were conducted with academic staff from ten Universities in England. The data are analysed using matrix analysis. Findings: Marked differences in the experience of the work-to-retirement transition were found and five groups are identified which characterise the significance of retirement. Clean Breakers view retirement as a welcome release from work. Opportunists and Continuing Scholars use retirement to re-negotiate the employment relationship. The Reluctant consider retirement as a loss of a valued source of identity and the Avoiders are undecided about retirement plans. Research limitations/implications: The focus of the study is at the individual level. A more complete understanding of retirement decisions would encompass organisational approaches to retirement issues. Practical implications: There are practical implications for academics approaching retirement. Not all academics wish to continue to engage in academic work in retirement. For those who do, opportunities are predominantly available to staff with stronger social and professional capital. Continued engagement necessitates personal adaptability and tolerance to ambiguity. Staff who are planning their careers might build such factors into retirement planning. Social implications: Organisations need to rethink their responsibilities in managing retirement processes as they face an increasing variety of retirement expectations in the workforce. Given the unfolding de-institutionalisation of retirement, both individuals and organisations need to re-negotiate their respective roles. Originality/value: The paper characterises the diversity of modes of experiencing retirement by academic staff, highlighting differences between the groups.

LanguageEnglish
Pages322-338
Number of pages17
JournalEmployee Relations
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Academic staff
Retirement
Staff
Academic work
Adaptability
Responsibility
Design methodology
Deinstitutionalization
Life course
Retirement planning
Workforce
England
Career planning
Factors
Tolerance
Structured interview

Cite this

@article{6abb01614dfe4c92955f347e887327b4,
title = "The Work-to-Retirement Transition of Academic Staff: Attitudes and Experiences",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the significance of the work-to-retirement transition for academic staff from a life course perspective and the manner in which individuals have managed the transition. Design/methodology/approach: In total, 32 semi-structured interviews were conducted with academic staff from ten Universities in England. The data are analysed using matrix analysis. Findings: Marked differences in the experience of the work-to-retirement transition were found and five groups are identified which characterise the significance of retirement. Clean Breakers view retirement as a welcome release from work. Opportunists and Continuing Scholars use retirement to re-negotiate the employment relationship. The Reluctant consider retirement as a loss of a valued source of identity and the Avoiders are undecided about retirement plans. Research limitations/implications: The focus of the study is at the individual level. A more complete understanding of retirement decisions would encompass organisational approaches to retirement issues. Practical implications: There are practical implications for academics approaching retirement. Not all academics wish to continue to engage in academic work in retirement. For those who do, opportunities are predominantly available to staff with stronger social and professional capital. Continued engagement necessitates personal adaptability and tolerance to ambiguity. Staff who are planning their careers might build such factors into retirement planning. Social implications: Organisations need to rethink their responsibilities in managing retirement processes as they face an increasing variety of retirement expectations in the workforce. Given the unfolding de-institutionalisation of retirement, both individuals and organisations need to re-negotiate their respective roles. Originality/value: The paper characterises the diversity of modes of experiencing retirement by academic staff, highlighting differences between the groups.",
keywords = "Academic Staff, Continuity Theory, Disengagement, Older Workers, Retirement, Universities",
author = "Eleanor Davies and Andrew Jenkins",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1108/01425451311320503",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "322--338",
journal = "Employee Relations",
issn = "0142-5455",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

The Work-to-Retirement Transition of Academic Staff : Attitudes and Experiences. / Davies, Eleanor; Jenkins, Andrew.

In: Employee Relations, Vol. 35, No. 3, 04.2013, p. 322-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Work-to-Retirement Transition of Academic Staff

T2 - Employee Relations

AU - Davies, Eleanor

AU - Jenkins, Andrew

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the significance of the work-to-retirement transition for academic staff from a life course perspective and the manner in which individuals have managed the transition. Design/methodology/approach: In total, 32 semi-structured interviews were conducted with academic staff from ten Universities in England. The data are analysed using matrix analysis. Findings: Marked differences in the experience of the work-to-retirement transition were found and five groups are identified which characterise the significance of retirement. Clean Breakers view retirement as a welcome release from work. Opportunists and Continuing Scholars use retirement to re-negotiate the employment relationship. The Reluctant consider retirement as a loss of a valued source of identity and the Avoiders are undecided about retirement plans. Research limitations/implications: The focus of the study is at the individual level. A more complete understanding of retirement decisions would encompass organisational approaches to retirement issues. Practical implications: There are practical implications for academics approaching retirement. Not all academics wish to continue to engage in academic work in retirement. For those who do, opportunities are predominantly available to staff with stronger social and professional capital. Continued engagement necessitates personal adaptability and tolerance to ambiguity. Staff who are planning their careers might build such factors into retirement planning. Social implications: Organisations need to rethink their responsibilities in managing retirement processes as they face an increasing variety of retirement expectations in the workforce. Given the unfolding de-institutionalisation of retirement, both individuals and organisations need to re-negotiate their respective roles. Originality/value: The paper characterises the diversity of modes of experiencing retirement by academic staff, highlighting differences between the groups.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the significance of the work-to-retirement transition for academic staff from a life course perspective and the manner in which individuals have managed the transition. Design/methodology/approach: In total, 32 semi-structured interviews were conducted with academic staff from ten Universities in England. The data are analysed using matrix analysis. Findings: Marked differences in the experience of the work-to-retirement transition were found and five groups are identified which characterise the significance of retirement. Clean Breakers view retirement as a welcome release from work. Opportunists and Continuing Scholars use retirement to re-negotiate the employment relationship. The Reluctant consider retirement as a loss of a valued source of identity and the Avoiders are undecided about retirement plans. Research limitations/implications: The focus of the study is at the individual level. A more complete understanding of retirement decisions would encompass organisational approaches to retirement issues. Practical implications: There are practical implications for academics approaching retirement. Not all academics wish to continue to engage in academic work in retirement. For those who do, opportunities are predominantly available to staff with stronger social and professional capital. Continued engagement necessitates personal adaptability and tolerance to ambiguity. Staff who are planning their careers might build such factors into retirement planning. Social implications: Organisations need to rethink their responsibilities in managing retirement processes as they face an increasing variety of retirement expectations in the workforce. Given the unfolding de-institutionalisation of retirement, both individuals and organisations need to re-negotiate their respective roles. Originality/value: The paper characterises the diversity of modes of experiencing retirement by academic staff, highlighting differences between the groups.

KW - Academic Staff

KW - Continuity Theory

KW - Disengagement

KW - Older Workers

KW - Retirement

KW - Universities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877839226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/01425451311320503

DO - 10.1108/01425451311320503

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 322

EP - 338

JO - Employee Relations

JF - Employee Relations

SN - 0142-5455

IS - 3

ER -