Theorizing construction industry practice within a disaster risk reduction setting

Is it a panacea or an illusion?

Bingunath Ingirige

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Construction industry practice is strongly influenced by the culture surrounding its operations and, with the prevailing emphasis on achieving efficiency, there is a strong focus on outcome metrics such as profitability and employee productivity. With the recent increases in natural hazard events worldwide, and the likelihood that this will worsen still further with anticipated climate changes, the industry is increasingly contributing to building resilience within disaster-affected communities. Existing industry expertise, its educational approaches and the related theoretical frameworks, however, all require adjustment if these changing needs are to be fully addressed. Most importantly, an agenda shift is required from the philosophical side and a more pragmatic approach is needed if community resilience goals and objectives are to be met, rather than the narrower focus of the current metrics-driven management system. A synthesis of the current literature is therefore presented, along with relevant case histories illustrating how such an agenda shift within a disaster management context may influence the development of appropriate theory, as well as impacting upon grass-roots educational requirements. The research concludes by discussing how the ‘mainstreaming’ of disaster management within construction industry practice could drive forward developments in theorizing expertise and educational provisions across the constituent disciplines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)592-607
Number of pages16
JournalConstruction Management and Economics
Volume34
Issue number7-8
Early online date5 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Aug 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Construction industry
Disasters
Climate change
Industry
Hazards
Profitability
Productivity
Personnel
Disaster
Education
Theorizing
Risk reduction
Agenda
Resilience
Disaster management
Expertise

Cite this

@article{6a5c903529694cd898dea88b37673a9b,
title = "Theorizing construction industry practice within a disaster risk reduction setting: Is it a panacea or an illusion?",
abstract = "Construction industry practice is strongly influenced by the culture surrounding its operations and, with the prevailing emphasis on achieving efficiency, there is a strong focus on outcome metrics such as profitability and employee productivity. With the recent increases in natural hazard events worldwide, and the likelihood that this will worsen still further with anticipated climate changes, the industry is increasingly contributing to building resilience within disaster-affected communities. Existing industry expertise, its educational approaches and the related theoretical frameworks, however, all require adjustment if these changing needs are to be fully addressed. Most importantly, an agenda shift is required from the philosophical side and a more pragmatic approach is needed if community resilience goals and objectives are to be met, rather than the narrower focus of the current metrics-driven management system. A synthesis of the current literature is therefore presented, along with relevant case histories illustrating how such an agenda shift within a disaster management context may influence the development of appropriate theory, as well as impacting upon grass-roots educational requirements. The research concludes by discussing how the ‘mainstreaming’ of disaster management within construction industry practice could drive forward developments in theorizing expertise and educational provisions across the constituent disciplines.",
keywords = "Construction education, Construction industry, Construction industry practice, Disaster resilience, Theorizing",
author = "Bingunath Ingirige",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/01446193.2016.1200735",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "592--607",
journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
issn = "0144-6193",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7-8",

}

Theorizing construction industry practice within a disaster risk reduction setting : Is it a panacea or an illusion? / Ingirige, Bingunath.

In: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 34, No. 7-8, 02.08.2016, p. 592-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theorizing construction industry practice within a disaster risk reduction setting

T2 - Is it a panacea or an illusion?

AU - Ingirige, Bingunath

PY - 2016/8/2

Y1 - 2016/8/2

N2 - Construction industry practice is strongly influenced by the culture surrounding its operations and, with the prevailing emphasis on achieving efficiency, there is a strong focus on outcome metrics such as profitability and employee productivity. With the recent increases in natural hazard events worldwide, and the likelihood that this will worsen still further with anticipated climate changes, the industry is increasingly contributing to building resilience within disaster-affected communities. Existing industry expertise, its educational approaches and the related theoretical frameworks, however, all require adjustment if these changing needs are to be fully addressed. Most importantly, an agenda shift is required from the philosophical side and a more pragmatic approach is needed if community resilience goals and objectives are to be met, rather than the narrower focus of the current metrics-driven management system. A synthesis of the current literature is therefore presented, along with relevant case histories illustrating how such an agenda shift within a disaster management context may influence the development of appropriate theory, as well as impacting upon grass-roots educational requirements. The research concludes by discussing how the ‘mainstreaming’ of disaster management within construction industry practice could drive forward developments in theorizing expertise and educational provisions across the constituent disciplines.

AB - Construction industry practice is strongly influenced by the culture surrounding its operations and, with the prevailing emphasis on achieving efficiency, there is a strong focus on outcome metrics such as profitability and employee productivity. With the recent increases in natural hazard events worldwide, and the likelihood that this will worsen still further with anticipated climate changes, the industry is increasingly contributing to building resilience within disaster-affected communities. Existing industry expertise, its educational approaches and the related theoretical frameworks, however, all require adjustment if these changing needs are to be fully addressed. Most importantly, an agenda shift is required from the philosophical side and a more pragmatic approach is needed if community resilience goals and objectives are to be met, rather than the narrower focus of the current metrics-driven management system. A synthesis of the current literature is therefore presented, along with relevant case histories illustrating how such an agenda shift within a disaster management context may influence the development of appropriate theory, as well as impacting upon grass-roots educational requirements. The research concludes by discussing how the ‘mainstreaming’ of disaster management within construction industry practice could drive forward developments in theorizing expertise and educational provisions across the constituent disciplines.

KW - Construction education

KW - Construction industry

KW - Construction industry practice

KW - Disaster resilience

KW - Theorizing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978878072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01446193.2016.1200735

DO - 10.1080/01446193.2016.1200735

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 592

EP - 607

JO - Construction Management and Economics

JF - Construction Management and Economics

SN - 0144-6193

IS - 7-8

ER -