'There ought not to be one law for the rich and another for the poor which is the case to-day'

The labour party, lotteries, gaming, gambling and bingo, c.1900-c.1960s

Keith Laybourn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the way in which the Labour Party moved from a position of outright opposition to gambling and gaming towards one of relative toleration and acceptance. This sea change began seriously in 1931 when many of the early Labour MPs, who were influenced by the anti-gambling sentiments of the Nonconformists and the Free Churches, lost their seats in the general election. The changing attitude to gambling was further fuelled by a sense of outrage at the evident bias of the existing gaming and gambling legislation against the working classes but also by the increasing dependence of the Constituency Labour Parties on lotteries and gaming as a vital source of income for paying for their full-time agents. In the end, the Labour Party had to accept that gambling was both a political expedient for the financial well-being of the Labour Party political machine and also an endemic feature of the life of its working-class supporters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-223
Number of pages23
JournalHistory
Volume93
Issue number310
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Gaming
Labour Party
Lottery
Gambling
Working Class
Labor
Legislation
Non-conformist
Sentiment
General Elections
Toleration
Supporters
Income
Constituency
Free Church
Outrage
Acceptance
Well-being

Cite this

@article{c513f5559cd14111b373b579525ac44e,
title = "'There ought not to be one law for the rich and another for the poor which is the case to-day': The labour party, lotteries, gaming, gambling and bingo, c.1900-c.1960s",
abstract = "This article examines the way in which the Labour Party moved from a position of outright opposition to gambling and gaming towards one of relative toleration and acceptance. This sea change began seriously in 1931 when many of the early Labour MPs, who were influenced by the anti-gambling sentiments of the Nonconformists and the Free Churches, lost their seats in the general election. The changing attitude to gambling was further fuelled by a sense of outrage at the evident bias of the existing gaming and gambling legislation against the working classes but also by the increasing dependence of the Constituency Labour Parties on lotteries and gaming as a vital source of income for paying for their full-time agents. In the end, the Labour Party had to accept that gambling was both a political expedient for the financial well-being of the Labour Party political machine and also an endemic feature of the life of its working-class supporters.",
author = "Keith Laybourn",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-229X.2008.00419.x",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "201--223",
journal = "History",
issn = "0018-2648",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "310",

}

'There ought not to be one law for the rich and another for the poor which is the case to-day' : The labour party, lotteries, gaming, gambling and bingo, c.1900-c.1960s. / Laybourn, Keith.

In: History, Vol. 93, No. 310, 01.04.2008, p. 201-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'There ought not to be one law for the rich and another for the poor which is the case to-day'

T2 - The labour party, lotteries, gaming, gambling and bingo, c.1900-c.1960s

AU - Laybourn, Keith

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - This article examines the way in which the Labour Party moved from a position of outright opposition to gambling and gaming towards one of relative toleration and acceptance. This sea change began seriously in 1931 when many of the early Labour MPs, who were influenced by the anti-gambling sentiments of the Nonconformists and the Free Churches, lost their seats in the general election. The changing attitude to gambling was further fuelled by a sense of outrage at the evident bias of the existing gaming and gambling legislation against the working classes but also by the increasing dependence of the Constituency Labour Parties on lotteries and gaming as a vital source of income for paying for their full-time agents. In the end, the Labour Party had to accept that gambling was both a political expedient for the financial well-being of the Labour Party political machine and also an endemic feature of the life of its working-class supporters.

AB - This article examines the way in which the Labour Party moved from a position of outright opposition to gambling and gaming towards one of relative toleration and acceptance. This sea change began seriously in 1931 when many of the early Labour MPs, who were influenced by the anti-gambling sentiments of the Nonconformists and the Free Churches, lost their seats in the general election. The changing attitude to gambling was further fuelled by a sense of outrage at the evident bias of the existing gaming and gambling legislation against the working classes but also by the increasing dependence of the Constituency Labour Parties on lotteries and gaming as a vital source of income for paying for their full-time agents. In the end, the Labour Party had to accept that gambling was both a political expedient for the financial well-being of the Labour Party political machine and also an endemic feature of the life of its working-class supporters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40449124098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-229X.2008.00419.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-229X.2008.00419.x

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 201

EP - 223

JO - History

JF - History

SN - 0018-2648

IS - 310

ER -