“They told me all mothers have worries”, stillborn mother's experiences of having a ‘gut instinct’ that something is wrong in pregnancy

Findings from an international case-control study

Jane Warland, Alexander EP Heazell, Tomasina Stacey, Christin Coomarasamy, Jayne Budd, Edwin A Mitchell, Louise M O'Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe and explore 'gut instinct' that something was wrong in women who identified that they experienced gut instinct during pregnancy.
Method: A case–control study utilising an international web-based questionnaire. Stillborn cases (n = 146) and liveborn controls (n = 234) answered the gut instinct question within 30 days of the pregnancy ending. Of those, 84 cases and 27 controls also provided qualitative comment data. Descriptive statistics were used for the question, with a fixed option and summative content analysis was used to analyse the comment data.
Findings: In all, 110 (75%) of the stillborn cases answered "yes" to the gut instinct question vs only 28 (12%) of the controls who had a livebirth meaning the risk of stillbirth was 22.5 fold higher in those who experience "gut instinct" than in those who do not experience this feeling. Four themes were identified from the comment data namely: When the gut instinct occurred; How the gut instinct made the woman feel; Dreams and other related phenomena; Reassured by someone or something.
Conclusions: Women who had a stillborn baby reported a "gut instinct" that something was wrong more frequently than mothers of a live born baby. Our findings may be influenced by recall negativity bias, and a prospective study is needed to confirm or refute our findings. The possibility that "maternal intuition" exists during pregnancy and responds to changes in fetal or placental health merits further exploration.
Implications for practice: Maternity care providers should be alert to the woman when she expresses intuitive feelings, as well as asking her to report her concerns and act appropriately to assess and manage fetal wellbeing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-176
Number of pages6
JournalMidwifery
Volume62
Early online date11 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Instinct
Case-Control Studies
Mothers
Pregnancy
Emotions
Intuition
Stillbirth
Prospective Studies

Cite this

Warland, Jane ; Heazell, Alexander EP ; Stacey, Tomasina ; Coomarasamy, Christin ; Budd, Jayne ; Mitchell, Edwin A ; O'Brien, Louise M. / “They told me all mothers have worries”, stillborn mother's experiences of having a ‘gut instinct’ that something is wrong in pregnancy : Findings from an international case-control study. In: Midwifery. 2018 ; Vol. 62. pp. 171-176.
@article{edc91420d2344b6fb538d0f35dd46594,
title = "“They told me all mothers have worries”, stillborn mother's experiences of having a ‘gut instinct’ that something is wrong in pregnancy: Findings from an international case-control study",
abstract = "Objective: To describe and explore 'gut instinct' that something was wrong in women who identified that they experienced gut instinct during pregnancy.Method: A case–control study utilising an international web-based questionnaire. Stillborn cases (n = 146) and liveborn controls (n = 234) answered the gut instinct question within 30 days of the pregnancy ending. Of those, 84 cases and 27 controls also provided qualitative comment data. Descriptive statistics were used for the question, with a fixed option and summative content analysis was used to analyse the comment data.Findings: In all, 110 (75{\%}) of the stillborn cases answered {"}yes{"} to the gut instinct question vs only 28 (12{\%}) of the controls who had a livebirth meaning the risk of stillbirth was 22.5 fold higher in those who experience {"}gut instinct{"} than in those who do not experience this feeling. Four themes were identified from the comment data namely: When the gut instinct occurred; How the gut instinct made the woman feel; Dreams and other related phenomena; Reassured by someone or something.Conclusions: Women who had a stillborn baby reported a {"}gut instinct{"} that something was wrong more frequently than mothers of a live born baby. Our findings may be influenced by recall negativity bias, and a prospective study is needed to confirm or refute our findings. The possibility that {"}maternal intuition{"} exists during pregnancy and responds to changes in fetal or placental health merits further exploration.Implications for practice: Maternity care providers should be alert to the woman when she expresses intuitive feelings, as well as asking her to report her concerns and act appropriately to assess and manage fetal wellbeing.",
keywords = "Maternal intuition, Gut feeling, Stillbirth, Fetal movements",
author = "Jane Warland and Heazell, {Alexander EP} and Tomasina Stacey and Christin Coomarasamy and Jayne Budd and Mitchell, {Edwin A} and O'Brien, {Louise M}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.009",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "171--176",
journal = "Midwifery",
issn = "0266-6138",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

“They told me all mothers have worries”, stillborn mother's experiences of having a ‘gut instinct’ that something is wrong in pregnancy : Findings from an international case-control study. / Warland, Jane; Heazell, Alexander EP; Stacey, Tomasina; Coomarasamy, Christin; Budd, Jayne; Mitchell, Edwin A; O'Brien, Louise M.

In: Midwifery, Vol. 62, 07.2018, p. 171-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - “They told me all mothers have worries”, stillborn mother's experiences of having a ‘gut instinct’ that something is wrong in pregnancy

T2 - Findings from an international case-control study

AU - Warland, Jane

AU - Heazell, Alexander EP

AU - Stacey, Tomasina

AU - Coomarasamy, Christin

AU - Budd, Jayne

AU - Mitchell, Edwin A

AU - O'Brien, Louise M

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Objective: To describe and explore 'gut instinct' that something was wrong in women who identified that they experienced gut instinct during pregnancy.Method: A case–control study utilising an international web-based questionnaire. Stillborn cases (n = 146) and liveborn controls (n = 234) answered the gut instinct question within 30 days of the pregnancy ending. Of those, 84 cases and 27 controls also provided qualitative comment data. Descriptive statistics were used for the question, with a fixed option and summative content analysis was used to analyse the comment data.Findings: In all, 110 (75%) of the stillborn cases answered "yes" to the gut instinct question vs only 28 (12%) of the controls who had a livebirth meaning the risk of stillbirth was 22.5 fold higher in those who experience "gut instinct" than in those who do not experience this feeling. Four themes were identified from the comment data namely: When the gut instinct occurred; How the gut instinct made the woman feel; Dreams and other related phenomena; Reassured by someone or something.Conclusions: Women who had a stillborn baby reported a "gut instinct" that something was wrong more frequently than mothers of a live born baby. Our findings may be influenced by recall negativity bias, and a prospective study is needed to confirm or refute our findings. The possibility that "maternal intuition" exists during pregnancy and responds to changes in fetal or placental health merits further exploration.Implications for practice: Maternity care providers should be alert to the woman when she expresses intuitive feelings, as well as asking her to report her concerns and act appropriately to assess and manage fetal wellbeing.

AB - Objective: To describe and explore 'gut instinct' that something was wrong in women who identified that they experienced gut instinct during pregnancy.Method: A case–control study utilising an international web-based questionnaire. Stillborn cases (n = 146) and liveborn controls (n = 234) answered the gut instinct question within 30 days of the pregnancy ending. Of those, 84 cases and 27 controls also provided qualitative comment data. Descriptive statistics were used for the question, with a fixed option and summative content analysis was used to analyse the comment data.Findings: In all, 110 (75%) of the stillborn cases answered "yes" to the gut instinct question vs only 28 (12%) of the controls who had a livebirth meaning the risk of stillbirth was 22.5 fold higher in those who experience "gut instinct" than in those who do not experience this feeling. Four themes were identified from the comment data namely: When the gut instinct occurred; How the gut instinct made the woman feel; Dreams and other related phenomena; Reassured by someone or something.Conclusions: Women who had a stillborn baby reported a "gut instinct" that something was wrong more frequently than mothers of a live born baby. Our findings may be influenced by recall negativity bias, and a prospective study is needed to confirm or refute our findings. The possibility that "maternal intuition" exists during pregnancy and responds to changes in fetal or placental health merits further exploration.Implications for practice: Maternity care providers should be alert to the woman when she expresses intuitive feelings, as well as asking her to report her concerns and act appropriately to assess and manage fetal wellbeing.

KW - Maternal intuition

KW - Gut feeling

KW - Stillbirth

KW - Fetal movements

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85045621536&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=%22They+told+me+all+mothers+have+worries%22%2c+stillborn+mother%27s+experiences+of+having+a+%27gut+instinct%27+that+something+is+wrong+in+pregnancy%3a+Findings+from+an+international+case--control+study&st2=&sid=64523e924920b8da84dceb977b8d81ef&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=202&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28%22They+told+me+all+mothers+have+worries%22%2c+stillborn+mother%27s+experiences+of+having+a+%27gut+instinct%27+that+something+is+wrong+in+pregnancy%3a+Findings+from+an+international+case--control+study%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=

U2 - 10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.009

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 171

EP - 176

JO - Midwifery

JF - Midwifery

SN - 0266-6138

ER -