Thinking Systemically-Thinking Politically: Building Strong Partnerships with Children and Families in the Context of Rising Inequality

Brid Featherstone, Karen Broadhurst, Kim Holt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prompted by findings from the Munro Review of Child Protection, this paper provides a critical analysis of the combination of changes that appear to have undermined social workers ability to develop strong partnerships with children and their families. Here, we engage with a number of now familiar lines of critique that have exposed the negative consequences of aspects of New Labours modernisation agenda (such as excessive standardisation). However, we challenge our readers to think more broadly about the political foundations of the New Labour project and, in particular, to consider how neo-liberal policies have in the past and are likely in the future to lead to the intensification of inequalities, thus undermining effective family work. Efforts to deal with excessive rules and procedures, or the revision of performance targets, as suggested in the Munro Review, will not mitigate the corrosive effects of rising social inequality. If we are to think systemically, as Munro suggests, then we must consider the likely regressive impact of impending public sector and welfare cuts and challenge any moves to sideline family support and restrict social work to a narrow focus on child protection.

LanguageEnglish
Pages618-633
Number of pages16
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

child protection
New Labour
family work
social inequality
social worker
modernization
Caustics
public sector
social work
Public Sector
welfare
Social Change
Social Work
ability
performance
Thinking

Cite this

@article{a4c9084d71a44416803cfa7a3bec00a7,
title = "Thinking Systemically-Thinking Politically: Building Strong Partnerships with Children and Families in the Context of Rising Inequality",
abstract = "Prompted by findings from the Munro Review of Child Protection, this paper provides a critical analysis of the combination of changes that appear to have undermined social workers ability to develop strong partnerships with children and their families. Here, we engage with a number of now familiar lines of critique that have exposed the negative consequences of aspects of New Labours modernisation agenda (such as excessive standardisation). However, we challenge our readers to think more broadly about the political foundations of the New Labour project and, in particular, to consider how neo-liberal policies have in the past and are likely in the future to lead to the intensification of inequalities, thus undermining effective family work. Efforts to deal with excessive rules and procedures, or the revision of performance targets, as suggested in the Munro Review, will not mitigate the corrosive effects of rising social inequality. If we are to think systemically, as Munro suggests, then we must consider the likely regressive impact of impending public sector and welfare cuts and challenge any moves to sideline family support and restrict social work to a narrow focus on child protection.",
keywords = "Child protection, child welfare, family support, social policy",
author = "Brid Featherstone and Karen Broadhurst and Kim Holt",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcr080",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "618--633",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Thinking Systemically-Thinking Politically : Building Strong Partnerships with Children and Families in the Context of Rising Inequality. / Featherstone, Brid; Broadhurst, Karen; Holt, Kim.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 42, No. 4, 01.06.2012, p. 618-633.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking Systemically-Thinking Politically

T2 - British Journal of Social Work

AU - Featherstone, Brid

AU - Broadhurst, Karen

AU - Holt, Kim

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Prompted by findings from the Munro Review of Child Protection, this paper provides a critical analysis of the combination of changes that appear to have undermined social workers ability to develop strong partnerships with children and their families. Here, we engage with a number of now familiar lines of critique that have exposed the negative consequences of aspects of New Labours modernisation agenda (such as excessive standardisation). However, we challenge our readers to think more broadly about the political foundations of the New Labour project and, in particular, to consider how neo-liberal policies have in the past and are likely in the future to lead to the intensification of inequalities, thus undermining effective family work. Efforts to deal with excessive rules and procedures, or the revision of performance targets, as suggested in the Munro Review, will not mitigate the corrosive effects of rising social inequality. If we are to think systemically, as Munro suggests, then we must consider the likely regressive impact of impending public sector and welfare cuts and challenge any moves to sideline family support and restrict social work to a narrow focus on child protection.

AB - Prompted by findings from the Munro Review of Child Protection, this paper provides a critical analysis of the combination of changes that appear to have undermined social workers ability to develop strong partnerships with children and their families. Here, we engage with a number of now familiar lines of critique that have exposed the negative consequences of aspects of New Labours modernisation agenda (such as excessive standardisation). However, we challenge our readers to think more broadly about the political foundations of the New Labour project and, in particular, to consider how neo-liberal policies have in the past and are likely in the future to lead to the intensification of inequalities, thus undermining effective family work. Efforts to deal with excessive rules and procedures, or the revision of performance targets, as suggested in the Munro Review, will not mitigate the corrosive effects of rising social inequality. If we are to think systemically, as Munro suggests, then we must consider the likely regressive impact of impending public sector and welfare cuts and challenge any moves to sideline family support and restrict social work to a narrow focus on child protection.

KW - Child protection

KW - child welfare

KW - family support

KW - social policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862984050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcr080

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcr080

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 618

EP - 633

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 4

ER -