Abstract
The potential for thorium as an alternative or supplement to uranium in fission power generation has long been recognised, and several reactors, of various types, have already operated using thorium-based fuels. Accelerator Driven Subcritical (ADS) systems have benefits and drawbacks when compared to conventional critical thorium reactors, for both solid and molten salt fuels. None of the four options - liquid or solid, with or without an accelerator - can yet be rated as better or worse than the other three, given today's knowledge. We outline the research that will be necessary to lead to an informed choice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | IPAC 2012 - International Particle Accelerator Conference 2012 |
Pages | 29-33 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Publication status | Published - 20 May 2012 |
Event | 3rd International Particle Accelerator Conference - Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, New Orleans, United States Duration: 20 May 2012 → 25 May 2012 Conference number: 3 https://cds.cern.ch/record/1445554 |
Conference
Conference | 3rd International Particle Accelerator Conference |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | IPAC 2012 |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | New Orleans |
Period | 20/05/12 → 25/05/12 |
Internet address |