Time allocation of site management

Anita Marjasalo, Anssi Koskenvesa, Teuvo Tolonen, Lauri Koskela

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to elicit how much time general superintendents and superintendents spend on different functions and, in specific, how much time is spent on work planning and preparation and supervising the work. A survey, in which 14 general superintendents and 10 superintendents filled in their time usage into a web database for one month (22 days on average) each, was carried out. The respondents could allocate their working hours in 16 different functions with the accuracy of a half an hour daily. In addition, one question was asked concerning the laboriousness of office work and IT systems, for which 14 answers were obtained. All answers were categorised based on the occupation of the respondent in general superintendents and superintendents. The supervision of work is still the most time consuming function for the general superintendent and the other superintendents; whereas work planning takes up only 15% of the site management's time. This finding shows that at the moment the site management rather supervises than plans and makes pre-requisites ready. Much of the non-value adding time could be eliminated by improving project management and designer cooperation and putting more emphasis on work planning and preparation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011
Pages230-239
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction - Lima, Peru
Duration: 13 Jul 201115 Jul 2011
Conference number: 19
https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/TIBKAT%3A746202156/19th-annual-conference-of-the-International-Group/

Conference

Conference19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction
Abbreviated titleIGLC2011
CountryPeru
CityLima
Period13/07/1115/07/11
Internet address

Fingerprint

Planning
Project management

Cite this

Marjasalo, A., Koskenvesa, A., Tolonen, T., & Koskela, L. (2011). Time allocation of site management. In 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011 (pp. 230-239)
Marjasalo, Anita ; Koskenvesa, Anssi ; Tolonen, Teuvo ; Koskela, Lauri. / Time allocation of site management. 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011. 2011. pp. 230-239
@inproceedings{39e80ec759e642928bcfa911566090f4,
title = "Time allocation of site management",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to elicit how much time general superintendents and superintendents spend on different functions and, in specific, how much time is spent on work planning and preparation and supervising the work. A survey, in which 14 general superintendents and 10 superintendents filled in their time usage into a web database for one month (22 days on average) each, was carried out. The respondents could allocate their working hours in 16 different functions with the accuracy of a half an hour daily. In addition, one question was asked concerning the laboriousness of office work and IT systems, for which 14 answers were obtained. All answers were categorised based on the occupation of the respondent in general superintendents and superintendents. The supervision of work is still the most time consuming function for the general superintendent and the other superintendents; whereas work planning takes up only 15{\%} of the site management's time. This finding shows that at the moment the site management rather supervises than plans and makes pre-requisites ready. Much of the non-value adding time could be eliminated by improving project management and designer cooperation and putting more emphasis on work planning and preparation.",
keywords = "Foreman, General superintendent, Production control, Site management, Time allocation",
author = "Anita Marjasalo and Anssi Koskenvesa and Teuvo Tolonen and Lauri Koskela",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781622768233",
pages = "230--239",
booktitle = "19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011",

}

Marjasalo, A, Koskenvesa, A, Tolonen, T & Koskela, L 2011, Time allocation of site management. in 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011. pp. 230-239, 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Lima, Peru, 13/07/11.

Time allocation of site management. / Marjasalo, Anita; Koskenvesa, Anssi; Tolonen, Teuvo; Koskela, Lauri.

19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011. 2011. p. 230-239.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Time allocation of site management

AU - Marjasalo, Anita

AU - Koskenvesa, Anssi

AU - Tolonen, Teuvo

AU - Koskela, Lauri

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to elicit how much time general superintendents and superintendents spend on different functions and, in specific, how much time is spent on work planning and preparation and supervising the work. A survey, in which 14 general superintendents and 10 superintendents filled in their time usage into a web database for one month (22 days on average) each, was carried out. The respondents could allocate their working hours in 16 different functions with the accuracy of a half an hour daily. In addition, one question was asked concerning the laboriousness of office work and IT systems, for which 14 answers were obtained. All answers were categorised based on the occupation of the respondent in general superintendents and superintendents. The supervision of work is still the most time consuming function for the general superintendent and the other superintendents; whereas work planning takes up only 15% of the site management's time. This finding shows that at the moment the site management rather supervises than plans and makes pre-requisites ready. Much of the non-value adding time could be eliminated by improving project management and designer cooperation and putting more emphasis on work planning and preparation.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to elicit how much time general superintendents and superintendents spend on different functions and, in specific, how much time is spent on work planning and preparation and supervising the work. A survey, in which 14 general superintendents and 10 superintendents filled in their time usage into a web database for one month (22 days on average) each, was carried out. The respondents could allocate their working hours in 16 different functions with the accuracy of a half an hour daily. In addition, one question was asked concerning the laboriousness of office work and IT systems, for which 14 answers were obtained. All answers were categorised based on the occupation of the respondent in general superintendents and superintendents. The supervision of work is still the most time consuming function for the general superintendent and the other superintendents; whereas work planning takes up only 15% of the site management's time. This finding shows that at the moment the site management rather supervises than plans and makes pre-requisites ready. Much of the non-value adding time could be eliminated by improving project management and designer cooperation and putting more emphasis on work planning and preparation.

KW - Foreman

KW - General superintendent

KW - Production control

KW - Site management

KW - Time allocation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876761972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.proceedings.com/17147.html

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781622768233

SP - 230

EP - 239

BT - 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011

ER -

Marjasalo A, Koskenvesa A, Tolonen T, Koskela L. Time allocation of site management. In 19th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2011, IGLC 2011. 2011. p. 230-239