Tokenism or true partnership: Parental involvement in a child’s acute pain care

Jacqueline Vasey, Joanna Smith, Marilynne Kirshbaum, Kathleen Chirema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To explore parental involvement in the child's acute pain care and establish ways in which parental preferences for involvement in their child's care can be identified, facilitated and enhanced by nurses. Background: Despite growing evidence supporting effective acute pain management in children and the availability of national and international practice guidelines, children still experience acute pain. Involving parents in their child's pain care has been identified as being a central tenet of pain management in children. Design and methods: A qualitative study using an ethnographical approach with nonparticipant observation and follow-up semi-structured interviews was undertaken. Nurses (n = 14), parents (n = 41), grandparents (n = 2), other relative (n = 1) and children (n = 30) participated. The framework approach underpinned data analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) enabled comprehensive reporting of the study. Results: Three concepts emerged from the data: “parents as advocates for their child,” “nurses promoting involvement and partnership” and “nurses unintentionally preventing involvement and partnership.” Variations in the way parents were involved in their child's pain care were identified. Despite family-centred care being the dominant model of involving families in their child's care, evidence of this being implemented was limited. Parents attempted to advocate effective pain care for their child, whether or not they were supported by nurses. Conclusions: Parental involvement in their child's acute pain care can improve the child's pain experience, reduce parental anxiety and increase parents’ satisfaction in care. Nurses aspired to involve parents in pain care, but did not always enact this in practice. Relevance for practice: Children deserve optimum pain care, which includes parental involvement. Parental involvement underpinned by the principles of family-centred care was poorly implemented. Parents attempted to be involved and advocate for their child's pain care whether or not they were supported by nurses. An alternative approach for supporting parents to advocate in their child's acute pain care is offered, the “Partnership in Pain Care Model.”.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1491-1505
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume28
Issue number9-10
Early online date14 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Acute Pain
Parents
Child Care
Nurses
Pain
Pain Management
Qualitative Research
Practice Guidelines
Anxiety
Observation
Interviews

Cite this

Vasey, Jacqueline ; Smith, Joanna ; Kirshbaum, Marilynne ; Chirema, Kathleen . / Tokenism or true partnership : Parental involvement in a child’s acute pain care. In: Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 9-10. pp. 1491-1505.
@article{b33901840de34cd2bff3af7ba4a5f650,
title = "Tokenism or true partnership: Parental involvement in a child’s acute pain care",
abstract = "Aims and objectives: To explore parental involvement in the child's acute pain care and establish ways in which parental preferences for involvement in their child's care can be identified, facilitated and enhanced by nurses. Background: Despite growing evidence supporting effective acute pain management in children and the availability of national and international practice guidelines, children still experience acute pain. Involving parents in their child's pain care has been identified as being a central tenet of pain management in children. Design and methods: A qualitative study using an ethnographical approach with nonparticipant observation and follow-up semi-structured interviews was undertaken. Nurses (n = 14), parents (n = 41), grandparents (n = 2), other relative (n = 1) and children (n = 30) participated. The framework approach underpinned data analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) enabled comprehensive reporting of the study. Results: Three concepts emerged from the data: “parents as advocates for their child,” “nurses promoting involvement and partnership” and “nurses unintentionally preventing involvement and partnership.” Variations in the way parents were involved in their child's pain care were identified. Despite family-centred care being the dominant model of involving families in their child's care, evidence of this being implemented was limited. Parents attempted to advocate effective pain care for their child, whether or not they were supported by nurses. Conclusions: Parental involvement in their child's acute pain care can improve the child's pain experience, reduce parental anxiety and increase parents’ satisfaction in care. Nurses aspired to involve parents in pain care, but did not always enact this in practice. Relevance for practice: Children deserve optimum pain care, which includes parental involvement. Parental involvement underpinned by the principles of family-centred care was poorly implemented. Parents attempted to be involved and advocate for their child's pain care whether or not they were supported by nurses. An alternative approach for supporting parents to advocate in their child's acute pain care is offered, the “Partnership in Pain Care Model.”.",
keywords = "Nurse, child, decision-making, family-centred care, involvement, pain, acute, partnership, nurse",
author = "Jacqueline Vasey and Joanna Smith and Marilynne Kirshbaum and Kathleen Chirema",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.14747",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1491--1505",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9-10",

}

Tokenism or true partnership : Parental involvement in a child’s acute pain care. / Vasey, Jacqueline; Smith, Joanna; Kirshbaum, Marilynne; Chirema, Kathleen .

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 28, No. 9-10, 01.05.2019, p. 1491-1505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tokenism or true partnership

T2 - Journal of Clinical Nursing

AU - Vasey, Jacqueline

AU - Smith, Joanna

AU - Kirshbaum, Marilynne

AU - Chirema, Kathleen

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Aims and objectives: To explore parental involvement in the child's acute pain care and establish ways in which parental preferences for involvement in their child's care can be identified, facilitated and enhanced by nurses. Background: Despite growing evidence supporting effective acute pain management in children and the availability of national and international practice guidelines, children still experience acute pain. Involving parents in their child's pain care has been identified as being a central tenet of pain management in children. Design and methods: A qualitative study using an ethnographical approach with nonparticipant observation and follow-up semi-structured interviews was undertaken. Nurses (n = 14), parents (n = 41), grandparents (n = 2), other relative (n = 1) and children (n = 30) participated. The framework approach underpinned data analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) enabled comprehensive reporting of the study. Results: Three concepts emerged from the data: “parents as advocates for their child,” “nurses promoting involvement and partnership” and “nurses unintentionally preventing involvement and partnership.” Variations in the way parents were involved in their child's pain care were identified. Despite family-centred care being the dominant model of involving families in their child's care, evidence of this being implemented was limited. Parents attempted to advocate effective pain care for their child, whether or not they were supported by nurses. Conclusions: Parental involvement in their child's acute pain care can improve the child's pain experience, reduce parental anxiety and increase parents’ satisfaction in care. Nurses aspired to involve parents in pain care, but did not always enact this in practice. Relevance for practice: Children deserve optimum pain care, which includes parental involvement. Parental involvement underpinned by the principles of family-centred care was poorly implemented. Parents attempted to be involved and advocate for their child's pain care whether or not they were supported by nurses. An alternative approach for supporting parents to advocate in their child's acute pain care is offered, the “Partnership in Pain Care Model.”.

AB - Aims and objectives: To explore parental involvement in the child's acute pain care and establish ways in which parental preferences for involvement in their child's care can be identified, facilitated and enhanced by nurses. Background: Despite growing evidence supporting effective acute pain management in children and the availability of national and international practice guidelines, children still experience acute pain. Involving parents in their child's pain care has been identified as being a central tenet of pain management in children. Design and methods: A qualitative study using an ethnographical approach with nonparticipant observation and follow-up semi-structured interviews was undertaken. Nurses (n = 14), parents (n = 41), grandparents (n = 2), other relative (n = 1) and children (n = 30) participated. The framework approach underpinned data analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) enabled comprehensive reporting of the study. Results: Three concepts emerged from the data: “parents as advocates for their child,” “nurses promoting involvement and partnership” and “nurses unintentionally preventing involvement and partnership.” Variations in the way parents were involved in their child's pain care were identified. Despite family-centred care being the dominant model of involving families in their child's care, evidence of this being implemented was limited. Parents attempted to advocate effective pain care for their child, whether or not they were supported by nurses. Conclusions: Parental involvement in their child's acute pain care can improve the child's pain experience, reduce parental anxiety and increase parents’ satisfaction in care. Nurses aspired to involve parents in pain care, but did not always enact this in practice. Relevance for practice: Children deserve optimum pain care, which includes parental involvement. Parental involvement underpinned by the principles of family-centred care was poorly implemented. Parents attempted to be involved and advocate for their child's pain care whether or not they were supported by nurses. An alternative approach for supporting parents to advocate in their child's acute pain care is offered, the “Partnership in Pain Care Model.”.

KW - Nurse

KW - child

KW - decision-making

KW - family-centred care

KW - involvement

KW - pain

KW - acute

KW - partnership

KW - nurse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059906108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.14747

DO - 10.1111/jocn.14747

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1491

EP - 1505

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 9-10

ER -