Trying Not to Lie ... and Failing: Autoethnography, Memory, Malleability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

All research is experiential, whether this is the experience of reading in the library or observing in the field. Autoethnographers take experience into narratives and are themselves key participants in their research, and often also its subject. For autoethnographers the idea of research as a neutral process is abandoned in favour of a self-reflective form that explores the researcher's perspective on the subject in question. Autoethnography inevitably negotiates the relationship between the stories we want to tell and the histories we have lived through; between the necessary fictions of publication/presentation and the real world experiences we draw upon. This article questions whether we can ever tell our experiences truthfully. This article questions what it might mean to write oneself into research findings and narrative reports, and it asks what happens when one's self goes further and becomes the research. It offers perspectives and provocations which are informed but not bound by autoethnography's extant body of thought and readers are invited on a brief journey through self-writing as it relates to the vagaries of memory and the illusion of truth.
LanguageEnglish
Pages 918-929
JournalThe Qualitative Report
Volume20
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Autoethnography
Illusion
Real World
Fiction
Journey
History
Reflective
Reader
Thought

Cite this

@article{6adf0d56f7d84fa1828024ddd6119983,
title = "Trying Not to Lie ... and Failing: Autoethnography, Memory, Malleability",
abstract = "All research is experiential, whether this is the experience of reading in the library or observing in the field. Autoethnographers take experience into narratives and are themselves key participants in their research, and often also its subject. For autoethnographers the idea of research as a neutral process is abandoned in favour of a self-reflective form that explores the researcher's perspective on the subject in question. Autoethnography inevitably negotiates the relationship between the stories we want to tell and the histories we have lived through; between the necessary fictions of publication/presentation and the real world experiences we draw upon. This article questions whether we can ever tell our experiences truthfully. This article questions what it might mean to write oneself into research findings and narrative reports, and it asks what happens when one's self goes further and becomes the research. It offers perspectives and provocations which are informed but not bound by autoethnography's extant body of thought and readers are invited on a brief journey through self-writing as it relates to the vagaries of memory and the illusion of truth.",
keywords = "Autoethnography, Self-Deception, Self-Reflection, Experiential Research, Memory",
author = "John Freeman",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "29",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "918--929",
journal = "The Qualitative Report",
number = "6",

}

Trying Not to Lie ... and Failing : Autoethnography, Memory, Malleability. / Freeman, John.

In: The Qualitative Report, Vol. 20, No. 6, 29.06.2015, p. 918-929.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trying Not to Lie ... and Failing

T2 - The Qualitative Report

AU - Freeman, John

PY - 2015/6/29

Y1 - 2015/6/29

N2 - All research is experiential, whether this is the experience of reading in the library or observing in the field. Autoethnographers take experience into narratives and are themselves key participants in their research, and often also its subject. For autoethnographers the idea of research as a neutral process is abandoned in favour of a self-reflective form that explores the researcher's perspective on the subject in question. Autoethnography inevitably negotiates the relationship between the stories we want to tell and the histories we have lived through; between the necessary fictions of publication/presentation and the real world experiences we draw upon. This article questions whether we can ever tell our experiences truthfully. This article questions what it might mean to write oneself into research findings and narrative reports, and it asks what happens when one's self goes further and becomes the research. It offers perspectives and provocations which are informed but not bound by autoethnography's extant body of thought and readers are invited on a brief journey through self-writing as it relates to the vagaries of memory and the illusion of truth.

AB - All research is experiential, whether this is the experience of reading in the library or observing in the field. Autoethnographers take experience into narratives and are themselves key participants in their research, and often also its subject. For autoethnographers the idea of research as a neutral process is abandoned in favour of a self-reflective form that explores the researcher's perspective on the subject in question. Autoethnography inevitably negotiates the relationship between the stories we want to tell and the histories we have lived through; between the necessary fictions of publication/presentation and the real world experiences we draw upon. This article questions whether we can ever tell our experiences truthfully. This article questions what it might mean to write oneself into research findings and narrative reports, and it asks what happens when one's self goes further and becomes the research. It offers perspectives and provocations which are informed but not bound by autoethnography's extant body of thought and readers are invited on a brief journey through self-writing as it relates to the vagaries of memory and the illusion of truth.

KW - Autoethnography

KW - Self-Deception

KW - Self-Reflection

KW - Experiential Research

KW - Memory

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 918

EP - 929

JO - The Qualitative Report

JF - The Qualitative Report

IS - 6

ER -